Mike Arnold
Registered
No testing? IML does lab testing on all their products. With IML, you get exactly what you pay for...with UGL gear, it can be anything!
If by "testing" you mean you don't know how well it will work...we know that information as well. Numerous people have now run this drug from both IML and previous companies, starting at least 6 months ago. We have quite a few reviews out there now with all sorts of dosing ranges. So, we know exactly how it works.
On top of that, this drug WAS tested way back in the 60's by U.S. researchers, who determined it was 3X as myotropic (muscle-building) as Dianbol, per mg. There was ZERO doub this drug outperformed Dianbol in their eyes...and now with more BB'rs using it in this day and age, that "fact" is now indisputable. It is definitely stronger than Dianabol...by a good margin. It also outperformed Anadrol, mg per mg, by a significant margin.
So, if you want to talk about trust...then IML's Methylstenbolone is more "trustworthy" in every way that matters. This includes lab testing every batch of raw material for purtity and potency, clinical research proving its superiority as a muscle builder, and real-world reviews confirming the researcher's claims. That's trust! Now...let me tell you what is NOT trust! Ordering from most UGL's, as few do any type of product testing...and many have no quality control measures in place at all! I won't even mention that fact UGL AAS are illegal and could be intercepted every time an intl order is placed. The seller could also operate under poor ethical standards, as you have no idea who these people are in most cases...so if they want to sell something they know is shit or bunk altogether, how are you going to know that prior to ordering? There are a million more reasons why IML's M-Sten is more "trustworthy" than your typical UGL bought bottle of D-bol, but I don't feel like typing anymore right now.
