- Joined
- Jun 1, 2010
- Messages
- 7,493
- Reaction score
- 1,006
- Points
- 113
Lets keep everyone honest here....
So if he followed proper procedures what would u say that the test is off?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Lets keep everyone honest here....
I don't know and I don't care. There are plenty of other shops that provide properly dosed gear.So if he followed proper procedures what would u say that the test is off?
Really like the lab goes out the way and makes me special gear.There are know special batches.
The guy test out at 1000 on watson test and 850 on z test if he even followed the protocol I see no actual test with proof?
The guy who tested was off by 150 out of the 1,000 he would have tested at on watson trt so he tested at 850 on z's test not bad at all he was only on 200mg week
Reps get free or discounted properly dosed gear. Bloodwork from reps means jack shit. I'll take Rambos word over any fucking rep. Especially an uncle z rep.
Have a nice day!
you think reps dont get fucked over with bunk or underdosed gear? like there's two different stashes or something? holy crap, that's naive or wishful thinking. idk which.
You are all a bunch of junks.
Sent from The Mothership
Everyone is entitled to there opinion! I have success with z gear If you tested 90% gear here you'd be sick with the results.
Its RamJam time !!!!!!
Sent from The Mothership
I had to look that up. That's a great song. Always reminds me of the movie Blow.
Black Betty that is.
Spiderbait makes a crazy version to that song.
Blow...mmmmm
Is it just me or does anyone think it's nuts to be disagreeing whether gear is gtg or bunk over less then 200 points.
I'd like to know how many other variables play into that total #? Like age, weight, height, body composition, diet, hydration, other medications, history, experience with Testosterone, length of use, etc, etc, etc. The list goes on and on. I would have to imagine they play a role and could effect the outcome or the test, especially when it's a relatively small deviation. Any thoughts on this? I'm completely biased and have no experience with Z or plan on it. Just wondering.
What about a difference by 600?Is it just me or does anyone think it's nuts to be disagreeing whether gear is gtg or bunk over less then 200 points.
I'd like to know how many other variables play into that total #? Like age, weight, height, body composition, diet, hydration, other medications, history, experience with Testosterone, length of use, etc, etc, etc. The list goes on and on. I would have to imagine they play a role and could effect the outcome or the test, especially when it's a relatively small deviation. Any thoughts on this? I'm completely biased and have no experience with Z or plan on it. Just wondering.
I'm thinking the same we dont know this dude there are many factors to look at.Is it just me or does anyone think it's nuts to be disagreeing whether gear is gtg or bunk over less then 200 points.
I'd like to know how many other variables play into that total #? Like age, weight, height, body composition, diet, hydration, other medications, history, experience with Testosterone, length of use, etc, etc, etc. The list goes on and on. I would have to imagine they play a role and could effect the outcome or the test, especially when it's a relatively small deviation. Any thoughts on this? I'm completely biased and have no experience with Z or plan on it. Just wondering.
Not trueOnce again..you're MISLEADING!!!
His levels were 1066 on Watson, not 1000. His current on EP Test Cyp is 850.
Bro math
1066-850=210 less Test