10,943 reasons France should support the United States

[Burner02]

ok, that was a blanket statement though....did you mean stereotype, instead? I know English isn't your prime language

 

[ZECH]

BTW.....................78% of the USA is supporting Bush now!!!!
Only 20% oppose.
And France is already wanting to have a role in the Post war Iraq. They want the benefits but don't want to help!!!!!!!!!

 

[Burner02]

Yeah, we have had fox on here @ work all day. I'd invite France..to stay at home..

 

[The Berg Master]

Originally posted by Burner02
ok, that was a blanket statement though....did you mean stereotype, instead? I know English isn't your prime language

Yes. Sorry! I meant stereotype... I actually believe that most people and countries have made that mistake. Myself included after 911.

 

[Sebi]

Originally posted by dg806
Berg and Sebi, you have made the wrong woman mad this time. I know when Jodi hops in, you have done it! I think you better stop while you can.

Stop---what? The conversation? You are not the one to tell me what to do. Or are you afraid of other people's opinion? You claim to have the freedom of thoughts, and now you want to control it. Not nice indeed.

 

[Pianomahnn]

Originally posted by Sebi
Take a look at the stock exchange.

Hi. That doesn't prove a point.

Once again, I ask for proof supporting this claim. If you don't have any, I understand. Because there isn't any.

 

[Pianomahnn]

Originally posted by The Berg Master
Furthermore I don't think Iraq has weapons of mass destruction.

That's all fine and dandy. But the UN Security Countil does. And last time I checked they have a whole lot more information than you do.

 

[Sebi]

Originally posted by Pianomahnn
Hi. That doesn't prove a point.

Once again, I ask for proof supporting this claim. If you don't have any, I understand. Because there isn't any.

Larry Lindsey, ex economic adviser said so too. If this is not a proof...

 

[The Berg Master]

Pianomahnn: Hans Blix said that he thought they might have weapons of mass destruction, but they had no proof whatsoever. I thought your system worked like this: "Innocent till proven guilty." Does that not apply to forregn countries when you are the ones making the allegations?

 

[The Berg Master]

http://www.connery.dk/index.php?artikelid=1009&PHPSESSID=1e015abd24886a54a24425f3cf8bc47f

 

[david]

Originally posted by Sebi
Stop---what? The conversation? You are not the one to tell me what to do. Or are you afraid of other people's opinion? You claim to have the freedom of thoughts, and now you want to control it. Not nice indeed.

No, I don't think dg is trying to tell you what to do but leading you to some advice.

Continue on and let your opinions flow... no one will ever stop you! How about... post more of your bodybuilding idea's and your workout... you seemed to be very impressive by the looks of your avi! Personally, I'd rather hear how you've achieved success. Isn't this what this Forum is about??

 

[Burner02]

good point, Dave-
I have been thinking that a lot of us must agree that we will not agree...

For each side...
For every point an anti-war stance person can say, someone else can come up with three 'facts' to dispove it, and vice-versa.

 

[Sebi]

Originally posted by david
No, I don't think dg is trying to tell you what to do but leading you to some advice.

Continue on and let your opinions flow... no one will ever stop you! How about... post more of your bodybuilding idea's and your workout... you seemed to be very impressive by the looks of your avi! Personally, I'd rather hear how you've achieved success. Isn't this what this Forum is about??

yep it's getting boring. I started a log though.

 

[Jodi]

Originally posted by The Berg Master
You people just wont stop refering to the 911 incident! I honestly don't believe Iraq was involved! (THERE IS NO PROOF, let alone reason why you would suggest they were involved except rasism = all muslim countries breed terrorists etc.) Furthermore I don't think Iraq has weapons of mass destruction. Even if they did, why shouldn't they be allowed to, when YOU certainly do? USA is the only country that has ever used the A-bomb! (Japan WWII)

Silly boy, you are the one thats sheltered - You ever hear of Salman Pak???? Do a search.

 

[ZECH]

Originally posted by Sebi
Stop---what? The conversation? You are not the one to tell me what to do. Or are you afraid of other people's opinion? You claim to have the freedom of thoughts, and now you want to control it. Not nice indeed.

No I meant talking about something you have no idea what the crap you are talking about. I have yet seen anyone on your side that has made a valid point...................and you never will.

 

[The Berg Master]

dg806: Never underestimate the power of denial!

 

[ZECH]

Originally posted by The Berg Master
Furthermore I don't think Iraq has weapons of mass destruction.

Go ahead and keep denying it...........................I want to see what you will say when we get in Baghdad and find all this shit. I bet you won't come around then!!!!!!!! I hope it blows up in your face!

 

[Jodi]

Originally posted by The Berg Master
Pianomahnn: Hans Blix said that he thought they might have weapons of mass destruction, but they had no proof whatsoever. I thought your system worked like this: "Innocent till proven guilty." Does that not apply to forregn countries when you are the ones making the allegations?

Yup, innocent til proven guilty. And thats what we've gone in to do, Prove them Guilty.

Oh and did you happen to do a search yet for Salman Pak?

 

[david]

Originally posted by The Berg Master
dg806: Never underestimate the power of denial!

DENIAL (in this sense)= Talking to others who refuse to see the other side of things and are closed minded.

 

[ZECH]

Originally posted by david
DENIAL (in this sense)= Talking to others who refuse to see the other side of things and are closed minded.

Exactly!

 

[ZECH]

http://www.globalsecurity.org/wmd/world/iraq/salman_pak.htm

 

[ZECH]

Take that frusht, berg and sebi! Oh that's a lie?.................Ok.

 

[ZECH]

BTW.................Thanks Jodi!!! Great info!

 

[david]

Salman Pak.... I expect someone to say that it's a lie to!

 

[The Berg Master]

Originally posted by Jodi
Yup, innocent til proven guilty. And thats what we've gone in to do, Prove them Guilty.

That's not the way it works. You are not punished until it has been proven that you are guilty! In this case you think USA should bomb Iraq and then it's ok if they do find something even though they didn't have any proof when they started the war? That is STUPID !

 

[Jodi]

Oh and we also go the meeting in Prague which involved Mohammed Atta and Iraqi officials.

Shall I go on.

 

[Pianomahnn]

Originally posted by The Berg Master
That's not the way it works. You are not punished until it has been proven that you are guilty! In this case you think USA should bomb Iraq and then it's ok if they do find something even though they didn't have any proof when they started the war? That is STUPID !

I don't think you've read many of the documents from the UN.

 

[Burner02]

there will be no convincing the anti- people until there is hard evidence.
Not even worth arguing over...

 

[kuso]

Originally posted by Burner02
there will be no convincing the anti- people until there is hard evidence.
Not even worth arguing over...

EXACTLY!!!!! I know I said I was out of this one, but if Salman Pak was such a slam dunk Bush himself would have used it to help convince the UN and or the coilition......not only that, but personally I do have ( and remember, I am for action against Hussain ) a problem with people that sound like this being sources of the information.


"Charles Duelfer, the former vice chairman of Unscom, the U.N. weapons inspection team, who actually visited the Salman Pak camp several times.
"I'm surprised that people seem to be shocked that there should be terror camps in Iraq. Like, derrrrrr! I mean, what, actually, do you expect?"

Sounds like a bright cookie.

 

[Jodi]

Kuso, I saw that article and there are thousands on Salman Pak and this probably has to be the worst one I read. London Observer had some very good ones as well as Rush Limbaugh.