she is no Angelina, not by a long shot.
Good thing.... Angelina is overated. Can't stand looking at those heroin arms.

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
she is no Angelina, not by a long shot.
http://www.metamorphosart.com/portfolio/portfolio4.html
The only change I could see was in the lighting
http://www.cynical-c.com/mt/mt-comments.cgi?entry_id=3673
Great Ass!!!!!
http://www.sortroom.net/index.php/archives/2005/09/08/beauty-secrets-of-the-stars-the-retouch/
I see your point in this one. Got rid of all that cottage cheese.
http://www.glennferon.com/portfolio1/portfolio09.html
Some I can see a big change, others no so much. Halle Berry is a 10 no matter what.
http://www.glennferon.com/portfolio1/portfolio22.html
Same. Some are kinda bad, others no so much,
Good thing.... Angelina is overated. Can't stand looking at those heroin arms.![]()
Good thing.... Angelina is overated. Can't stand looking at those heroin arms.![]()
Why is it only black chicks?
I don't think airbrushing and photoshop are to blame for the deception...since ancient times men and women have gone to drastic measures to make their bodies look up to that dates fads....vomitoriums in Rome, extreme girdles in the Elizabethan era, Chinese foot binding....even the simple wearing of pantyhose to make legs look smoother and tanner...fixing the color n contrast so on i can see but changing a black womans eyes to blue is just cruel... taking 4 inches off the waist of this woman???
http://www.glennferon.com/portfolio1/portfolio23.html why?
n seriously how many guys here have perfectly nice girlfriends but still like to spend some personal time with pics that are tweaked up for the mass consumption of a public that has agreed to be decieved? it's easy to say young girls shouldn't compare themselves unfavorably to the glam shots but who exactly are the glam shots taken for? altered for? baaaaaaa![]()
I don't think airbrushing and photoshop are to blame for the deception...since ancient times men and women have gone to drastic measures to make their bodies look up to that dates fads....vomitoriums in Rome, extreme girdles in the Elizabethan era, Chinese foot binding....even the simple wearing of pantyhose to make legs look smoother and tanner...
Hell there was a time when men wore white powder make-up and wigs, then the 80's came and made makeup and big hair popular again...
I agree with what you are saying, Little Wing. I think photoshop is often taken too far. I always hate it when a girl I am seeing compares herself to touched up pro photos and say they wished they looked like that or had her boobs, hips, or butt. I actually like how the original picture looks better than the photoshop in the above link. Thanks for sharing, these things are interesting.
What happened to this thread?
![]()
because we live in a society where people are free to tell this woman that just being pretty is enough.... then go on to tell her that she is not pretty enough until we have painted her face n barbie-fied her body.
I wouldn't fuck her with a Mexican's dick.
Seriously?
All I am saying is that human history shows that the majority of people are going to go with whats popular, all that you can do is resist social norms and be your own person...sadly i think the media can make the majority of us all look like clowns just by telling us this or that is "in" i'll decide for myself. by looking at trends there are a lot of women confusing being loose n sloppy with the media's hypeing of the big ass...
vomitoriums in Rome, extreme girdles in the Elizabethan era, Chinese foot binding... all were disasterous to the body, and that white powder contained lead i think. accepted practice doesn't make a thing right.