Casey Anthony

[flexxthese]

You seem to know more about the talking heads than I do.

You don't seem to be able to understand that a missing child isn't quite the same thing as mother that failed to report her child missing--who was found in long dead in a trunk--and wasn't even the one that reported it.

I'm not driving 8 miles for it, but it's reasonable that I state that she's a murderer, even if incompetent lawyers fucked up the case.

I should also mention that you're arguing just as much in favor of her as those that are arguing against her.

Don't you think this stuff happens every day in america and around the world? People slaughter, mutilate, and rape their best friends, children, parents, etc everyday. Is it a shame? Yes of course, but to single out one heinous incident and ignore the rest is arrogant and foolish for argument.

You do realize how our court system works right? Because you seem to be like the rest of the cry babies that throw blame around without even understanding the situation. Lawyers don't make the judgement. The judge, does not make the judgement. Evidence is gathered, it is presented to a jury of our peers and interviews are given with them overseeing. The jury is responsible for reviewing the evidence and making a decision based on that and that alone. Convictions based on speculation go against everything our legal system stands for. But you're right, clearly you could have done a better job than the state of florida prosecutor with years of trial experience...What would your case have consisted of? "Shes guilty because I say so and I know it!"

edit: and i'm not arguing her innocence or guilt, just arguing those who swear they know she did it with no physical backing to their argument, or people talking down on the prosecutor or judge when it has nothing to do with them but they can't seem to grasp that concept. Did you also get upset at her sentencing that the judge was too lenient? That's a good one I hear a lot too..

 

[DOMS]

Don't you think this stuff happens every day in america and around the world? People slaughter, mutilate, and rape their best friends, children, parents, etc everyday. Is it a shame? Yes of course, but to single out one heinous incident and ignore the rest is arrogant and foolish for argument.

I probably know more about it than most people. But this isn't the rest of the world, this is the US. Mothers that murder their children should go free.

You do realize how our court system works right?

You do realize that driving on the roads can result is dying because of someone else's incompetence, right? So when you family member or friend dies, make sure to keep your mouth shut. Because it's clear that when shit goes wrong, it's "just the way it works."

Lawyers don't make the judgement. The judge, does not make the judgement.

You have the gall to so something so moronic, yet alluding to my not failing in some way. Yes, the lawyers don't make the judgement, but they can go after the death penalty when it's statistically proven that women are almost never get sentenced for it. They can also screw up a valid case. But that's okay, since they're not the ones passing judgement.

In any case, my outrage is less for the legal system and more for a mother than would kill her own 2 year old child.

 

[AKIRA]

I find it bothersome that so many people are so deeply involved in this. 11 impartial Jurors who watched every minute of the testimony and saw every last shred of evidence acquitted her in 9 hours. Everyone else was just subjected to news clips, and Nancy Grace type babble on T.V.

I actually watched it wholeheartedly to see if shed get off and observe the outrage. I knew she would get off just by what was being presented, yet everyone kept voicing their emotional predictions. "Theyre gonna fry her ass" made me I kept wondering if they were even watching the trial and if they were, were they so biased that they 'willed' the jury to find her guilty.

Bah. It will be forgotten about in a year thanks to the media hunting down new stories and new hype trains to crash.

All aboard!

 

[hoyle21]

You seem to know more about the talking heads than I do.

You don't seem to be able to understand that a missing child isn't quite the same thing as mother that failed to report her child missing--who was found in long dead in a trunk--and wasn't even the one that reported it.

I'm not driving 8 miles for it, but it's reasonable that I state that she's a murderer, even if incompetent lawyers fucked up the case.

I should also mention that you're arguing just as much in favor of her as those that are arguing against her.

She was acquitted and rightfully so. I am absolutely not saying she is innocent of murder, but to convict and sentence someone to death on that little bit of evidence would have been a bigger injustice than the verdict we got. They couldnt prove, how she died, where she died, who killed her, how long she was dead, or why she was killed. They are 0-for in real evidence.

States like Texas have carried out death sentences with harder information, only to find out by DNA evidence years later that the person was innocent.

The issue that I think he has is the same as mine, everyone in this thread seems to be 100% positive that she killed her daughter. Based on sound bites and clips from Bonbon eating Nancy Grace like television shows.

A lot of those same people are hooting and hollering about the biased media and how they can't be trusted in other threads.

 

[hoyle21]

I actually watched it wholeheartedly to see if shed get off and observe the outrage. I knew she would get off just by what was being presented, yet everyone kept voicing their emotional predictions. "Theyre gonna fry her ass" made me I kept wondering if they were even watching the trial and if they were, were they so biased that they 'willed' the jury to find her guilty.

Bah. It will be forgotten about in a year thanks to the media hunting down new stories and new hype trains to crash.

All aboard!

Nice post!!!

Yes, because everyone just spoon feeds themselves whatever the news shows them. Very few people are capable of thinking for themselves anymore. I thought for sure she was going to get off, but when they reached a verdict after only 9 hours I thought for sure the jury was going to come back with a crazy verdict. Usually a fast decision is a guilty decision. I'm glad this Jury took their responsiblities seriously.

 

[DOMS]

The issue that I think he has is the same as mine, everyone in this thread seems to be 100% positive that she killed her daughter. Based on sound bites and clips from Bonbon eating Nancy Grace like television shows.

Having lawyers fuck up a case does not prove that the system works. It only proves that it's fallible.

Let me guess, you're not a parent, correct?

 

[hoyle21]

Having lawyers fuck up a case does not prove that the system works. It only proves that it's fallible.

Let me guess, you're not a parent, correct?

Not sure how lawyers fucked up the case. They may have over reached on murder 1 but there were lesser charges as well. The evidence flat out wasn't there.


You guess wrong again.

 

[DOMS]

You guess wrong again.

This is the Internet, so you could be lying. I say that because you seem a little confused on how a 2 year old lives.

What? You think the mother didn't report the kid missing because the kid has a long, two year, history of month-long drunken benders in Vegas, and why should the mother be worried this time because she always comes back? Or maybe the kid ran off with her boyfriend again, and she does this all the time, but they'll end up having a lover's spat and she always comes back?

Since you don't seem sure, I'll clue you in: 2 year-olds don't do those sorts of things.

Most people here aren't saying the legal system is broke, nor are they saying we should allow double jeopardy. We're saying that some people fucked up and that a mother that refuses to report her child missing is a horrible person.

I guess that unlike you, we're not entitled to our opinions.

You're awesome.

Really.

 

[Little Wing]

Not sure how lawyers fucked up the case. They may have over reached on murder 1 but there were lesser charges as well. The evidence flat out wasn't there.


You guess wrong again.

If you do have kids I feel sorry for them, if you can defend Casey Anthony hard telling what scum you bring around your kids. Do you not fucking get that she didn't report a two year old missing for a month? That her mother had to finally report Caylee missing?

A Florida judge is considering whether to unseal a jailhouse video of acquitted murder suspect Casey Anthony that was considered so "highly inflammatory" that it would have made it difficult to give her a fair trial.
The video shows Anthony reacting to news reports that a child's body had been found in a swampy area near the Anthony home.
The tape reportedly shows Anthony double over and start to hyperventilate when Orange County jail officials told her a meter reader had stumbled upon the remains near Suburban Drive, according to an Orlando Sentinel article from 2009.
At the time of the Dec. 11, 2008 video, the body was not identified to be the remains of her 2-year-old daughter Caylee. Positive identification came eight days later.



You are a moron. Do you know where your kids are?

 

[Little Wing]

Is probably going down, that jury didn't take much time at all.

Id still probably hit it.

Yea, your kids have it made with a protector like you around. Great instincts dad. Think with your dick ALL the time there Einstein?

 

[AKIRA]

Yea, your kids have it made with a protector like you around. Great instincts dad. Think with your dick ALL the time there Einstein?

 

[Little Wing]

i hit girls

Don't you have some wolves to wrestle? seriously, how desperate for a woman do you have to be to think of having a go at a woman in that kind of a mess?

 

[Little Wing]

Funny how Hoyle doesn't get people watching this case, caring so much, yet he's the one that watched the trial and made this thread. And Akira you're not better, claiming your buddies girlfriends get you hooked on shows women normally watch. Not a big surprise you two watched the trial and are more interested in the rights of some party girl whore than a dead two year old with duct tape on the face of her skull. Classy.

 

[Zaphod]

Funny how Hoyle doesn't get people watching this case, caring so much, yet he's the one that watched the trial and made this thread. And Akira you're not better, claiming your buddies girlfriends get you hooked on shows women normally watch. Not a big surprise you two watched the trial and are more interested in the rights of some party girl whore than a dead two year old with duct tape on the face of her skull. Classy.

How people can kill children is beyond me. Nothing infuriates me more. There is nothing a child can do that would deserve death.

 

[GearsMcGilf]

she's a sociopath, her view of the world is not the same as you and I in many ways. with extreme narcissism the super ego is not fully functional and/or did not develop normally, it is immaturity to the extreme. everything is about "me", those kinds of people are controlled by the Id.

lol. From John M. Keynes to Sigmund Freud. But, yes there's no doubt her ID is in control. Apparently, she even suggested early on, that she and her lawyer should go on Howard Stern so that they could "get information out." Then, she laughed and said "but, he'd probably ask about my bra size." This was when she was released to her parents for a short time, before the body was found. This was according to the woman that was appointed to stay with her at the home, as her bodyguard while she was out on bail. Apparently, it was a big adventure to her at first.

 

[flexxthese]

Let me guess, you're not a parent, correct?

oh god i was wondering when that was going to come in. It's hopeless, I won't even bother trying to have an educated debate at this point.

 

[DOMS]

oh god i was wondering when that was going to come in. It's hopeless, I won't even bother trying to have an educated debate at this point.

Don't let the door hit your ass on the way out.

 

[Little Wing]

(CNN) -- Casey Anthony owes authorities just under $98,000 for the costs of investigating the disappearance of her 2-year-old daughter, Caylee, in 2008, a Florida judge ruled Thursday.
The decision means prosecutors are set to recoup less than one-fifth of the more than $516,000 that they had sought. The state had argued that if it were not for the 25-year-old Orlando woman's lies, investigators wouldn't have had to expend the time and money to find her daughter's body.
They searched for five months, eventually finding Caylee's skeletal remains in woods less than a mile from her grandparents' Orlando home.
Orange County Superior Court Chief Judge Belvin Perry Jr. found Anthony is liable for expenses incurred from July 15, 2008, when Caylee was reported missing, to September 29 of that year, when authorities ended their missing-person case and opened a homicide investigation.
But she was not ordered to pay back investigative costs -- as the state had requested -- incurred between September 30 and December 19, 2008. The latter is the date when Caylee's remains were positively identified, eight days after they were found.
While it doesn't agree fully with the ruling, the Orange County state attorney's office does not plan any more action to try to recoup money from Anthony, spokesman Randy Means said.
"We're disappointed that our theory wasn't substantiated by the judge, but we will live with the results of the ruling," Means added. "We're pleased ... that some of the money will be returned to the taxpayers. Unfortunately, it wasn't anywhere close to what the state agencies thought they were due."
A jury acquitted Anthony in July on murder and other charges related to her daughter's death. At the same time, she was convicted on three lesser charges of misleading authorities in the case.
Anthony's attorneys admitted she lied to authorities during the search for her daughter, saying she knew the girl was dead. Her attorneys have claimed that young Caylee died accidentally.
There was no immediate reaction to the ruling from Anthony's camp. But at a hearing earlier this month, one of her lawyers, J. Cheney Mason, characterized the effort to make his client pay as unfair, given her acquittal on the most serious charge of murder.
"What about the justice for the defense that we won?" Mason said, contending the prosecution wanted reimbursement for crimes that had nothing to do with those for which Anthony was convicted.
In his ruling Thursday, Perry granted $61,505.12 to the Florida Department of Law Enforcement for "costs ... reasonably related to the investigative work provided as a result of (Anthony) providing false information as to the location of her daughter, Caylee Anthony, and making other false misrepresentations."
For the same reasons, $10,283.90 will go toward the Metropolitan Surveillance Bureau "for electronic surveillance costs from July 22, 2008, through September 29, 2008," the judge determined.
And the Orange County Sheriff's Office is to be reimbursed $25,837.96 for its costs during that time. But that figure could rise.
Perry stated that some expense reports from that office "were not adequately broken down in order to determine the work performed (between) July 15, 2008, through September 29, 2008." He requested that 30 individuals submit revised reports by September 19, after which he could order Anthony to pay back more.
Perry denied requests from the state attorney's office for reimbursement of its costs, beyond $50 "for the costs of prosecution of the (three) misdemeanor convictions."
In sum, the judge on Thursday ordered Anthony to pay authorities $97,626.98.

 

[Big Pimpin]

(CNN) -- Casey Anthony owes authorities just under $98,000 for the costs of investigating the disappearance of her 2-year-old daughter, Caylee, in 2008, a Florida judge ruled Thursday.
The decision means prosecutors are set to recoup less than one-fifth of the more than $516,000 that they had sought. The state had argued that if it were not for the 25-year-old Orlando woman's lies, investigators wouldn't have had to expend the time and money to find her daughter's body.
They searched for five months, eventually finding Caylee's skeletal remains in woods less than a mile from her grandparents' Orlando home.
Orange County Superior Court Chief Judge Belvin Perry Jr. found Anthony is liable for expenses incurred from July 15, 2008, when Caylee was reported missing, to September 29 of that year, when authorities ended their missing-person case and opened a homicide investigation.
But she was not ordered to pay back investigative costs -- as the state had requested -- incurred between September 30 and December 19, 2008. The latter is the date when Caylee's remains were positively identified, eight days after they were found.
While it doesn't agree fully with the ruling, the Orange County state attorney's office does not plan any more action to try to recoup money from Anthony, spokesman Randy Means said.
"We're disappointed that our theory wasn't substantiated by the judge, but we will live with the results of the ruling," Means added. "We're pleased ... that some of the money will be returned to the taxpayers. Unfortunately, it wasn't anywhere close to what the state agencies thought they were due."
A jury acquitted Anthony in July on murder and other charges related to her daughter's death. At the same time, she was convicted on three lesser charges of misleading authorities in the case.
Anthony's attorneys admitted she lied to authorities during the search for her daughter, saying she knew the girl was dead. Her attorneys have claimed that young Caylee died accidentally.
There was no immediate reaction to the ruling from Anthony's camp. But at a hearing earlier this month, one of her lawyers, J. Cheney Mason, characterized the effort to make his client pay as unfair, given her acquittal on the most serious charge of murder.
"What about the justice for the defense that we won?" Mason said, contending the prosecution wanted reimbursement for crimes that had nothing to do with those for which Anthony was convicted.
In his ruling Thursday, Perry granted $61,505.12 to the Florida Department of Law Enforcement for "costs ... reasonably related to the investigative work provided as a result of (Anthony) providing false information as to the location of her daughter, Caylee Anthony, and making other false misrepresentations."
For the same reasons, $10,283.90 will go toward the Metropolitan Surveillance Bureau "for electronic surveillance costs from July 22, 2008, through September 29, 2008," the judge determined.
And the Orange County Sheriff's Office is to be reimbursed $25,837.96 for its costs during that time. But that figure could rise.
Perry stated that some expense reports from that office "were not adequately broken down in order to determine the work performed (between) July 15, 2008, through September 29, 2008." He requested that 30 individuals submit revised reports by September 19, after which he could order Anthony to pay back more.
Perry denied requests from the state attorney's office for reimbursement of its costs, beyond $50 "for the costs of prosecution of the (three) misdemeanor convictions."
In sum, the judge on Thursday ordered Anthony to pay authorities $97,626.98.

As much as I hate that slut, this is nothing more than the DA and Sheriff trying to save face after a cluster fuck of an investigation and trial.

 

[Little Wing]

not really. they have the right to have funds returned. sometimes if a person does something really fucking stupid they need to pay back the search and rescue funds too. i'm thinking maybe they want to make sure if she writes a book or some shit she doesn't profit from killing her kid.

 

[Big Pimpin]

not really. they have the right to have funds returned. sometimes if a person does something really fucking stupid they need to pay back the search and rescue funds too. i'm thinking maybe they want to make sure if she writes a book or some shit she doesn't profit from killing her kid.

They are only going after her because they lost and she's going to financially win at some point with her story. I agree they have the right to go after her, but how many other murderers have they financially went after in that same jurisdiction?

 

[Zaphod]

They are only going after her because they lost and she's going to financially win at some point with her story. I agree they have the right to go after her, but how many other murderers have they financially went after in that same jurisdiction?

I'd wager this is the first. And it's only because it's such a high profile case that Casey Anthony is at some point in the future going to profit from it.

 

[Little Wing]

maybe they'd have left her alone if she killed a man not a little girl that depended on her to protect her. who knows why they did and i don't care if it was pride motivated i'm glad they did it. she knew her child was dead and led them on an expensive wild goose chase. the money and man power could have been used on something better. it was your money after all.

 

[Big Pimpin]

We still don't know the crazy bitch actually did it. Of course I'm not saying she doesn't know how the kid died, but there's a whole lot of unanswered questions hence the jury's verdict.