"dorian destroys arnold in that picture" I know Arnold didn't have the same drugs, but I didn't say anything about that. He doesn't look better as a bodybuilder.ForemanRules said:That is 20 years in time between the two...........and a boat load of drugs....
Arnold isnt as big.......but he looks better
Look at them from the side and tell me Arnold's waist doesn't look half as big.
Dorian is like 7 inches shorter than Arnold -ForemanRules said:That is 20 years in time between the two...........and a boat load of drugs....
Arnold isnt as big.......but he looks better
Look at them from the side and tell me Arnold's waist doesn't look half as big.
Ok, if we put them both up on stage, who would win? Dorian for sure.ForemanRules said:You are wrong again sir
Yes, not in my eyes, but in bodybuilding it does.The Monkey Man said:
I mean by today's standards. I wouldn't know about the 1974 rules. Maybe Arnold would have beat him back then...ForemanRules said:In 1974
nope
In 1995
ForemanRules said:No its not.....
I know all the answers..............just ask and I will let you know
ForemanRules said:
Gunter will be the next Mr "O" before Jay...jaim91 said:
THEUNIT(XXL) said:
Back in 1974-80 Dorian would still get a good place in the top 10, just like Ruhl now, because people would like to see a freak, and Arnold was a freak back then but if Dorian would compete, the whole standard would change, he would not win the title but he would sell tickets and there for get 2-5th place.
Arnold in 1992-98 would not even be a Pro, and if he was he would not qualify for the Olympia, the truth is that these pictures are always bullshit, it always looks like every body was the same hight and the same size, but you know that Dorian's waist was way bigger than Arnold's so why do they look the same size?
And the legs almost look the same size also, while the standard back hen was small cut legs, while Dorian's legs were freaky like they were supposed to be.
With that in consideration you would know that Dorian's was bigger in every way except for hight, so the picture is not good for comparison.
.....like I said mix both times......1974 Dorian would be 220-225 and would be top 10 in the Olympia but he would be destroyed by: Arnold, Sergio, Franco, Mentzer, Robinson, ect.....
You really don't get it man, you can't say Arnold would have been 400pounds if he competed right now, if you want to compare them, compare them as they where in there prime, then he would get destroyed.ForemanRules said:Another boot licking post of the drug generation
Arnold in 1992-1998 would be 270 not 237 so to say he wouldn't qualify for the Olympia is a joke
1992-1998.....Arnold would be #1 and you know it
400THEUNIT(XXL) said:You really don't get it man, you can't say Arnold would have been 400pounds if he competed right now, if you want to compare them, compare them as they where in there prime, then he would get destroyed.
Like that Dorian might just as well be smaller but more cut if he were competing back then, but you can't change the way they look(ed), because of a different times. he would be this big if he were competing right now, come on man that's just bullshit, you can't say how big he would be!
270, 400 it's all the same.ForemanRules said:400
No I said 270..................and he would have destroyed Dorian easily...
Dorian went from 235 to 260 when He started abusing GH and some of the new drug technology....
Arnold is much smarter and trained harder so he would have gained 35lbs or more with the new drugs easily....
Before I kick the shit out of you, witch image is it that you are talking about?row622 said:
