Equipoise....better for bulking or cutting?

[jozifp103]

This is another one I've yet to find use for. Mainly because it seems there are better compounds for either goal, bulking or cutting. Not to mention the fact that it's a slow acting compound and generally high doses are required for optimal results.


It seems to be very versatile however. Seems to have great hardening effects and adds great vascularity on a cut....but supposedly also is good for a bulk due to its tendency to increase hunger. Some say it adds mass at a similar rate to deca. So for those of you who utilize EQ....which goal would you say it's better suited for? Adding mass, or cutting?

 

[VictorZ06]

Can be used for both....but I would much rather use it for a high dose LOOONG bulk. About 18 weeks at around 1g EW. Gains are slow, but there is very little water retention and I like the hunger pains I get for the first few weeks....helps push down those extra cals for a bulk. There are far better choices for cutting though, however....it can be used. Not my choice....but it really all boils down to what you are doing in the kitchen. My favorite cutting agent is tren....yes, a 19 nor is much harder on you and a lot more precautions need to be taken. But tren is hard to be....especially combined with quality var (and test obviously...prop IMHO).




/V

 

[theCaptn']

I've run bold cyp before - obviously kicks in a lot quicker, I liked to use it with EQ. 400 cyp + 600 EQ balanced out well.