thanks, some points well taken but you sound like you are talking out your arse, to your son.
gr81 wrote:
> what do you mean safe steroids. Its not like there
> are two catagories of safe drugs and non safe drugs.
> it isn't that cut and dry man.
what i meant is safeR or milder but didnt think it reqrd an explain. my bad
> You should not be taking steroids, only for the simple
> fact taht you know nothing about them.
that is the most synergistically stupid thing i have read all night. i am here to research it, Then take the steroids yah Mulah...
> Also you can easily accomlpish the goals you
> have without them.
yea yea yea i think most people reading have trained natural...When did you figure that out? You must have started doing the stuff the first time you grabbed a dumbbell. Still, not all people and goals are built the same. Many people are not even capable of lifting. im a bit older now and suffered some serious injuries and not going to avoid these drugs just because some stranger states that they are not neccesary; lets face it if they were necc, you would all have a prescription, so dont you think its a bit hypocritical to advise someone else not to explore them? haha look at me im justifying steroid education to a user who has little more than 50gm of knowledge about me but tells me not to use.
this reminds me too much of usenet. you go on and post a few simple facts or a few simple questions and you get back advice on how to RUN YOUR LIFE hahahha. internet authoritarians by the Millions - where authoritarianism leads to ignorance. where are your credentials anyway, 50% of online users misrepresent who they are according to some major study - and i believe it