-
Hello, this board in now turned off and no new posting.
Please REGISTER at Anabolic Steroid Forums, and become a member of our NEW community!
-
Check Out IronMag Labs® KSM-66 Max - Recovery and Anabolic Growth Complex
homebrew powder
- Thread starter jacks
- Start date
no it was raw powder
CaptainPectorals
Registered
maybe the producer added the color as a way to keep track of what is what?
EO makes a night and day difference with my prop; impossible to tell where i injected except for pin prick.
he say its becuse the subtract with new chemical
it was 10g so it was not costle
anxious1
Registered
Bold base? I am about to order some for a TNE/Bold blend. So hopefully i can find out soon. Yet I would expect pain.
BigD4life
Registered
anxious1
Registered
frigging mad scientist, lol
gl
Looks who's talking, I see you finding a way to crank out some TNE/Dbol @ 100/75ml.
haha maybe we could change the industry forever! Just have to find the right (and safe) solvent/carrier.Bold prop is one of the worst things ever to inject so I've heard. It was making people sick.
i am really interested in this please keep us posted
i thinks its going to be like d-bol in the gain but not toxic
anxious1
Registered
NPP would be a a bit more for gains I believe. The Bold should be phenomenal for strength, especially tied in with the TNE. The lean gains would be perfect for pre-cutting prep. (on TNE/Bold Base)
anxious1
Registered
How do you guys think a TNE(or prop)/Drostanolone prop/Nandrolone (base/or prop) blend would go? I have a buddy running longer esters and has shown some damn good results. Wondering what your take on this is?
its great blend you will never go wrong deac and Masteron the complet each other that will let the water retention to the minimum all you need is test and some will add eq but i never add eq i will try it next time
anxious1
Registered
50/50, or I may go with a melt at 75/75. Not quite so sure however... I think 75/75 would be awesome. I could probably go much higher if I do a melt. I am looking into it.
huh??????????
I believe he said deca and masteron are quite complementary when run together. The masteron probably helps reduce the bloat due to it's AI-like properties. Throw some test in their food a working peen and if you want, add EQ.
People need to proofread
People need to proofread
anxious1
Registered
I believe he said deca and masteron are quite complementary when run together. The masteron probably helps reduce the bloat due to it's AI-like properties. Throw some test in their food a working peen and if you want, add EQ.
People need to proofread
Running EQ and deca together? That wouldn't make sense to do.
For some reason I just have this feeling I've read it tons of times not to do that because they are very similar.
Misconception. EQ and Deca can work and some people will go 800 test, 400 deca, 600 eq or something similar for bulks. EQ makes most eat like a horse, which is a good thing when you're using deca
. "It´s not very common to compare Equipoise to testosterone; however a far more common comparison is between Equipoise and Deca. I suspect this is because when Dan Duchaine introduced this compound to the steroid using community, he made an immediate comparison to Deca, speculating that it would act similarly to Deca but like a much stronger version of it. Equipoise doesn´t actually act much like deca at all; Deca is actually a progestin and a 19-nor derived steroid whereas Equipoise is more closely related to testosterone (being only one double bond differ rent). Duchaine later rescinded his original statement on Equipoise and said that it was disappointing as a mass builder when compared with deca, but a far better drug than for both strength gains and vascularity. Unfortunately, the myth that Equipoise´s action is similar to Deca´s has persisted for nearly 2 decades after he revised his opinion; this is most evident on internet message boards today, where many will advise against including both of them in a cycle because "they act the same way"
anxious1
Registered
Misconception. EQ and Deca can work and some people will go 800 test, 400 deca, 600 eq or something similar for bulks. EQ makes most eat like a horse, which is a good thing when you're using deca
"It´s not very common to compare Equipoise to testosterone; however a far more common comparison is between Equipoise and Deca. I suspect this is because when Dan Duchaine introduced this compound to the steroid using community, he made an immediate comparison to Deca, speculating that it would act similarly to Deca but like a much stronger version of it. Equipoise doesn´t actually act much like deca at all; Deca is actually a progestin and a 19-nor derived steroid whereas Equipoise is more closely related to testosterone (being only one double bond differ rent). Duchaine later rescinded his original statement on Equipoise and said that it was disappointing as a mass builder when compared with deca, but a far better drug than for both strength gains and vascularity. Unfortunately, the myth that Equipoise´s action is similar to Deca´s has persisted for nearly 2 decades after he revised his opinion; this is most evident on internet message boards today, where many will advise against including both of them in a cycle because "they act the same way"
Haha I stand corrected... I have actually read that exact same article... I just switched it in my mind over time... My apologies for giving bad info.
thare are lot of myths and you will only learn by trying
friend of my did deca and tren and test all people told him that is bad cycle you dont mix deca and tren together all bad thing is going to happens but he did and it was great
not a lot of people do that cycle , and not all you know is right until it proven wrong
friend of my did deca and tren and test all people told him that is bad cycle you dont mix deca and tren together all bad thing is going to happens but he did and it was great
not a lot of people do that cycle , and not all you know is right until it proven wrong
anxious1
Registered
^^ Very true bro, it is all trial and error.
Question: So my friend will filter some brew into a large container, to get this into 30 ML vials, should he run it through a syringe filter even though it has been sterile filtered, or just take the sterile batch and use a syringe and needle to put it into the 30ml vial?
Just looking for the safest approach. If he should put it through a syringe filter, since it was pre-filtered, should he just use, say, a .45 for ease of use?
Hope i worded the question properly...
thanks.
Just looking for the safest approach. If he should put it through a syringe filter, since it was pre-filtered, should he just use, say, a .45 for ease of use?
Hope i worded the question properly...
thanks.
fuck it, its nearly here now so i have no choice. the last lot of enth i got was a powder and didnt melt until it was placed in a container that was submerged in boiling hot water.
i remember seeing a pic of some test enth that had been stored in a draw by someone and it had melted and it was still good to go?!
oh well, see what happens i guess.
i just did some research, melting point is between 30-35oC, so if sending from a hot humid area theres a chance that its going to melt isnt there!? its not being cold shipped or anything.
BigD4life
Registered
Sure there's a chance for it to melt. The pout I'm trying to make is that if it's melting it's not being properly stored. A reputable supplier will store their product properly.
fair enough, cheers for that.
how about testing for purity, anyone taken the plunge?!
BigD4life
Registered
Is there a place to actually do this? Im not aware of any lab you can go to with a bag of powder hormones and ask them to test for purity. I just don't know if this can be done. I'm not 100% sure but it would seem to me very unlikely to be able to test raw powders in the U.S.
