- Joined
- Feb 3, 2003
- Messages
- 6,370
- Reaction score
- 132
- Points
- 0
- Age
- 40
My point was that I've seen more rabid vegetarians than those who eat meat. Which is counter to what Crono said.![]()
ah, I'm guilty of something. I've devoted so much time in previous debates straying from being accusing but I let it slip this time. I've spent my time in pro/con vegetarian arguments enough and I choose to avoid them now, I find myself typing or saying the same thing over and over. And while I've actually had good results from my take on it, it's such a tiring and exhausting procedure just to get someone to respect that I've decided something for myself and I respect them for accepting it.
Basically what we have here is a very serious case of labeling and absolutism. As soon as one person says they're a vegetarian someone else must argue against it,not because of their choice but because what they expect from that person and what it stands for. A "vegetarian" is not someone who doesn't eat meat in a non vegetarian's head, it's a person who is overly defensive, wrongfully self rightious, PETA loving hippy. A "non vegetarian" to vegetarians is someone who is uneducated, heartless, and an ignorant extremist. No one cares what I do or don't eat. That's where labeling comes in. And then as the friction begins to heat up people begin to polarize one way or the other until both sides are farther and farther from one another to the point that they don't even know why they hate each other, and absolutism takes in.
So there, I just saved you 50 pages of how vegetarians have sex with animals and non vegetarians would eat their own young if it were legal.