Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
He should have confessed years ago.
Curious other then hit HRs what did Mcgwire do to be considered for the Hall. I just don't see him as a HOFer
That's like saying Brett Hull isn't a Hall of Famer because all he did was score goals.![]()
He was more of a traditional slugger than the on base machines that today's sluggers are. He was more of a Mickey Mantle/Reggie Jackson type...lots of HR and RBIs but a lower batting average with lots of strikeouts.
I don't know.... I just don't see Mcgwire as a great player.
the hand eye coordination to hit the ball at the perfect time to hit so many HR's
He was more of a traditional slugger than the on base machines that today's sluggers are. He was more of a Mickey Mantle/Reggie Jackson type...lots of HR and RBIs but a lower batting average with lots of strikeouts.
Your right Iain, Mantle does not belong to that group.Doesn't really compare to Mantle, he was the shit. But very similar numbers to Jackson.
I don't know.... I just don't see Mcgwire as a great player.
You know I can't help myself with the Yankee propaganda.This is a Mark McGwire thread. Enough with your Mickey Mantle crap.![]()
Stop there, if your a Boston fan you would know your team is also guilty of this. Go ask the Kansas city fans how they feel about these teams......wait, the teams with the highest payroll doesnt always gaurenttee a WS.Baseball also needs a salary cap. Letting the Yankees buy their way to every championship is fucking ridiculous.
I also have no more interest in the NBA. It is an absolutely fixed sport that focuses on gambling and corrupt referees who give stars preferential treatment. That and it has also become a more thuggish, ghetto league where it's 90% black and consists of 1-on-1 play and no team work.
I just hope Roger Goodell wont fuck up the NFL any time soon.
I voted no, clearly Bonds was a phenomenal player before steriod use. But I do understand the reasoning for considering the Asterick.
Take a look at his stats pre 2000 and post 2000 quite a remarable difference
http://mlb.mlb.com/NASApp/mlb/mlb/stats/mlb_individual_stats_player.jsp?playerID=111188&statType=1
Pre 2000 Avg HR per Season 32
Post 200 Avg HR per Season 52
Pre OB% 407
Post OB% 535
Pre Slug% 561
Post Slug% 611
Pre Bat avg .288
Post Bat avg .341
Obviously Bonds has quite a remarkable improvement to his preformance since 2000, in which it would seem quite obvious Steriods have enhanced his natural abilities. Let alone the Fact that he should be on the down side of his career not the upswing at the age of 40.
It is foolish to think that steriods have not helped him get the single season record, nor more than likely the Career HR record. No doubt he has amazing Hand-eye coordination, why else would he be in the major leagues? Hitting a ball is a matter of hundreths of second for reaction time. Increased strenght allows one to get the back through the hitting area at a quicker rate, giving Bonds an opportunity to make better contact with the ball.
However, I voted no, because there are always going to be circumstances that could have impacted ones performance. He is a great athlete and nothing could take away from that, steroids or no steroids.
No they won't you are right
Bonds already had an exceptional eye at the plate. Howvever the increased bat speed will make a huge difference. Now instead of not being able to get the bat around fast enough to fight off the inside pitch, Bonds can can get the meat of the bat around to make solid contact.
All those Deep fly balls now become Homruns from the increased BAt speed. Strike outs where he couldn't get the bat around now have the possibilty of being hits. There are so many scenarios of improvements to situations from improved bat speed, I could go on and on.
No one is arguing that he doesn't have a great eye at the plate and there is no doubt that steroids don't enhance that, but they are allowing him to take better advantage of his abilites.
In related news, water is still wet.
The Boston Red Sox and closer Jonathan Papelbon came to terms on a one-year contract, the team announced Tuesday night. The deal, which means the Red Sox and Papelbon will avoid arbitration for the second straight offseason, has a base salary of $9.35 million with incentives that could make it worth more than $9.5 million, according to an industry source.
In addition to the base salary, Papelbon will receive a $50,000 bonus if he finishes 60 games (he finished 59 last season). The deal also includes standard incentives for MVP, Cy Young, All-Star Game and so on.
The contract is the largest ever for a relief pitcher with four years or less in service time, topping Eric Gagne's $8 million in 2005. Seven big league closers have contracts for $10 million or more. Papelbon's deal puts him just under that number.
The Red Sox paying Papeldouche $850,000 more than the Rays are paying their entire starting rotation.
The Red Sox paying Papeldouche $850,000 more than the Rays are paying their entire starting rotation.
Oh no doubt the Yankees can roll up $100 bills and light them up....but I do laugh hard when a Met and Red sox fan cry's about the money the Yankee fan spends.And Javier Vazquez is getting 11.5 million per season. Not bad for a back of the rotation guy.