Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It describes how Naji Sabri, Saddam's foreign minister, told the CIA's station chief in Paris at the time, Bill Murray, through an intermediary that Iraq had "virtually nothing" in terms of WMD.
Horse shit! The 9/11 conspiracy theorists said the US gov't did this. So who is full of shit? Cheney or the 9/11 truthers?Falsely stated that an attack such as 9/11 was unforeseeable, when Al Qaeda flying planes into the World Trade Center and Pentagon was something which American military and intelligence services and our allies knew could happen
What Else Did He Lie About?
The New York Times? Maureen Dowd writes today:
In a documentary soon to appear on Showtime, ?The World According to Dick Cheney,? [Cheney said] ?I got on the telephone with the president, who was in Florida, and told him not to be at one location where we could both be taken out.? Mr. Cheney kept W. flying aimlessly in the air on 9/11 while he and Lynn left on a helicopter for a secure undisclosed location, leaving Washington in a bleak, scared silence, with no one reassuring the nation in those first terrifying hours.
?I gave the instructions that we?d authorize our pilots to take it out,? he says, referring to the jet headed to Washington that crashed in a Pennsylvania field. He adds: ?After I?d given the order, it was pretty quiet. Everybody had heard it, and it was obviously a significant moment.?
***
When they testified together before the 9/11 Commission, W. and Mr. Cheney kept up a pretense that in a previous call, the president had authorized the vice president to give a shoot-down order if needed. But the commission found ?no documentary evidence for this call.?
In other words, Cheney pretended that Bush had authorized a shoot-down order, but Cheney now admits that he never did. In fact, Cheney acted as if he was the president on 9/11. *
Cheney lied about numerous other facts related to 9/11 as well. For example, Cheney:
Falsely linked Iraq with 9/11 (indeed, the entire torture program was aimed at establishing such a false linkage; and Cheney is the guy who pushed for torture, pressured the Justice Department lawyers to write memos saying torture was legal, and made the pitch to Congress justifying torture. The former director of the CIA said Cheney oversaw American torture policies)
Falsely claimed that spying on Americans, torture, the Patriot Act, the Afghanistan war, the Iraq war and the ?war on terror? were all necessitated by 9/11 ? when all of them started or were planned before 9/11
Falsely stated that an attack such as 9/11 was unforeseeable, when Al Qaeda flying planes into the World Trade Center and Pentagon was something which American military and intelligence services ? and our allies ? knew could happen
Falsely pretended that he was out of the loop during the 9/11 attacks
Falsely blamed others for 9/11, when Cheney was in charge of all of America?s counter-terrorism exercises, activities and responses on 9/11. See this Department of State announcement and this CNN article ?
? And when Cheney was apparently responsible for letting the Pentagon get hit by an airplane (confirmed here and here)
And was instrumental in squashing a real investigation into 9/11
* Indeed, Cheney initiated Continuity of Government plans on 9/11 which essentially nullified America?s constitutional form of government.
Cheney Admits that He Lied about 9/11 | Washington's Blog
Maureen Dowd / Repent, Dick Cheney - Pittsburgh Post-Gazette
Sadaam got what he deserved
but it was not our responsibility to kill him, the US needs to keeps it's fucking nose out of everyone else's business, and at the financial and death cost it was not worth killing Sadaam, he was not a threat to the US.
Prince I respect you, but your opinion is the minority and you can dislike what the Gov't does but in all reality it falls on deaf ears.but it was not our responsibility to kill him, the US needs to keeps it's fucking nose out of everyone else's business, and at the financial and death cost it was not worth killing Sadaam, he was not a threat to the US.
didnt we put Saddam in power? we are the worst chess players when we think we could lose we throw a fit and sweep the pieces off the table
Sadaam got what he deserved
Prince I respect you, but your opinion is the minority and you can dislike what the Gov't does but in all reality it falls on deaf ears.
Sadaam got what he deserved
20 years later its still bushs fault even now as spending is outa control![]()
It's called war, when your country calls you, you go, no one wants to see americans die or get wounded, but thats not for us to decideyeah but our troops did not deserve to die so sadaam can get what he deserved.
Lam I read the book written by the navy seal Kris Kyle, he said "sadaam had every thing needed for a dirty bomb, they just never had it in a ICBM" also I think the economy is hurting from the deficit created by the wars, Stimulus?we went into Iraq under false pretenses and de-stabilized the entire middle-east but they knew that. it's much worst now than it's ever been before. while it wouldn't have occurred that 2.2T spent on another unnecessary "war" that did not benefit anybody except the capitalists would have been well needed stimulus to the US economy.
Lam I read the book written by the navy seal Kris Kyle, he said "sadaam had every thing needed for a dirty bomb, they just never had it in a ICBM" also I think the economy is hurting from the deficit created by the wars, Stimulus?
Well lets see, shooting at our planes in the no-fly zone was reason enough, let alone he tried to have George H. Bush Killed, if you don't like it here go somewhere else, no one is making you stay, Maybe you can be Mister Know it all somewhere else.lots of country's have the ability to make dirty bombs and setting one of would benefit them how exactly? so the US can come an totally annihilate your infrastructure and shut down your economy, it makes no sense at all.
historically wars are over profits and wealth. the only country that has been running around killing people just to do it and prove a point the past 50 years is the US. we did it in Korea, the Philippines, etc.
waring in the middle east, SE Asia, etc. have always been over natural resources since oil was discovered there and conflicts in the old USSR were also over resources. wars bankrupt nations it doesn't build them, the only people that ultimately benefit are those that own the means of production. that's the way it's always been and always will be.
for a country to obtain nuclear capability means the US is no longer a threat and can not bully you around. that's why they try to stop any and all country's from obtaining the technology.
20 years later its still bushs fault even now as spending is outa control![]()
Well lets see, shooting at our planes in the no-fly zone was reason enough, let alone he tried to have George H. Bush Killed, if you don't like it here go somewhere else, no one is making you stay, Maybe you can be Mister Know it all somewhere else.
just imagine what we could have done in our own country with $2.2 trillion, sad that it wasted on a Bush family grudge.
I can imagine..Obuma would have spent it on bogus green energy programs and more welfare and food stamp and unemployment bennis hell everyone needs 5 years to find a job...
![]()
Horse shit! The 9/11 conspiracy theorists said the US gov't did this. So who is full of shit? Cheney or the 9/11 truthers?
Dead and alive: Beliefs in contradictory conspiracy theories. | Robbie Sutton - Academia.eduThe present research shows that even mutually incompatible conspiracy theories are positively correlated in endorsement. In Study 1 (n = 137), the more participants believed that Princess Diana faked her own death, the more they believed that she was murdered. In Study 2 (n = 102), the more participants believed that Osama Bin Laden was already dead when U.S. special forces raided his compound in Pakistan, the more they believed he is still alive. Hierarchical regression models showed that mutually incompatible conspiracy theories are positively associated because both are associated with the view that the authorities are engaged in a cover-up (Study 2). The monological nature of conspiracy belief appears to be driven not by conspiracy theories directly supporting one another but by broader beliefs supporting conspiracy theories in general.