• Hello, this board in now turned off and no new posting.
    Please REGISTER at Anabolic Steroid Forums, and become a member of our NEW community!
  • Check Out IronMag Labs® KSM-66 Max - Recovery and Anabolic Growth Complex

Mike Arnold - tell me about GH-15!!

Muscle Gelz Transdermals
IronMag Labs Prohormones
please explain why you think PCT is BS?

Waste of time and money. What's the point of putting all those hormones in your body then coming off and going through all that hell of feeling like shit and losing hard earned gains.

If you wanna be conservative then it is so much better to just cruise on low dose for a few months, and skip that whole "1 step forward 1 step back" process of coming off and doing pct
 
Pct has its place....IMO it is used when not needed or pointless more then not...
 
Not much to say. It is a gimmick account. Multiple people have used the account. He/They are not pro(s). To me, most of it is pretty boring to me at this point. Some of what he says is true, some is not. He certainly isn't a chem god, but he isn't ignorant either.

Shortest Mike Arnold rant ever :(
 
Waste of time and money. What's the point of putting all those hormones in your body then coming off and going through all that hell of feeling like shit and losing hard earned gains.

If you wanna be conservative then it is so much better to just cruise on low dose for a few months, and skip that whole "1 step forward 1 step back" process of coming off and doing pct

Whether or not PCT is useless is wholly dependent on what is important to the individual. For guys who run traditional cycles ("on" time followed by "off" time), PCT is helpful, as it helps preserve one's gains by more quickly restoring a normal hormonal environment. Keep in mind, not everyone wants to stay on drugs all the time.

In addition, not everyone who wants to be on TRT for life post-AAS. Some guys want to enjoy steroids without getting too crazy, build a decent level of mass, and maintain normal testicular function after their BB'ing days are over....and for those of who who think no one can build a decent physique when using the traditional "cycling" method (on time/off time), think again. Many pros from the 80's followed this method of steroid use...and we saw some great physiques back then. No, they weren't as big as the pros today...and the BB'r who follows this method isn't going to look his best all the time, but many great physiques have been built this way, including some of the best pro physiques from the 80's. If anyone thinks all the pros from the 80's stayed on steroids year-round, they are sadly mistaken. Many of them took considerable time off after competitions and even took substantial amounts of time off during the off-season. For an 80's pro, it was very common to use AAS only 6-8 months out of the year. This includes pro champions! Of course, some used more frequently, but generally speaking, taking time off was "normal".

So, anyone who says it isn't possible to build a great physique using the cycling method is flat-out WRONG! It has already happened an un-told number of times. Of course, genetics will play a signifiant role, as always, but if the ability is there, many guys can build an amazing physique with traditional cycling.

For guys who want to get as big as possible, don't care about natural T production/fertility, and are willing to take the health risks associated with year-round use (or close to it), then PCT is pointless.
 
Waste of time and money. What's the point of putting all those hormones in your body then coming off and going through all that hell of feeling like shit and losing hard earned gains.

If you wanna be conservative then it is so much better to just cruise on low dose for a few months, and skip that whole "1 step forward 1 step back" process of coming off and doing pct


Well I disagree...


But, there's just not much to add after Mikes POV other than I agree. PCT is for some, not far all but certainly for most. I sure wish it would have been as common knowledge before the internet as it has become since the web has taken over.
 
Well I disagree...


But, there's just not much to add after Mikes POV other than I agree. PCT is for some, not far all but certainly for most. I sure wish it would have been as common knowledge before the internet as it has become since the web has taken over.

Yeah i agree too. A good PCT protocol would've helped me tremendously back when i first started dabbling in aas. The information was much harder to come by then and now i know im lucky not to have really screwed myself up. Instead i just kept having to waste money and then start over. Now im hrt for life but then it wouldve been a big help.

Sent from my DROID RAZR HD using Tapatalk 2
 
PCT is helpful if used appropriately. The problem is a lot of guys run several cycles per year and do PCT for each. This makes no sense. If you're going several cycles per year, just cruise at 150mg test in between.

Now if someone we only going to run one, maybe two cycles per year, then it makes sense. Also, if you're coming off for an extended period it's also needed.
 
Back
Top