• Hello, this board in now turned off and no new posting.
    Please REGISTER at Anabolic Steroid Forums, and become a member of our NEW community!
  • Check Out IronMag Labs® KSM-66 Max - Recovery and Anabolic Growth Complex

Physics Magazine Concludes: All 3 WTC Towers Collapsed Due to Controlled Demolition

Arnold

Numero Uno
Staff member
Administrator
Joined
Nov 29, 2000
Messages
82,681
Reaction score
3,072
Points
113
Location
Las Vegas
15 Years Later, Physics Magazine Concludes: All 3 WTC Towers Collapsed Due to Controlled Demolition


New York, NY ? Over the past 15 years many highly respected academics and experts have come forward to challenge the official narrative on the collapse of the WTC towers forwarded by the U.S. government. The official government position holds that the collapse of all three towers was due to intense heat inside of the buildings.

But a new forensic investigation into the collapse of the three World Trade Center towers on 9/11, published in Europhysics News ? a highly respected European physics magazine ? claims that ?the evidence points overwhelmingly to the conclusion that all three buildings were destroyed by controlled demolition.?

While many in the mainstream have attempted to label anyone questioning the official narrative as ?tin foil hat? conspiracy theorist, many highly respected experts have come forward to lampoon the idea that the buildings collapsed due to the intense heat and fires following two terrorist-directed plane crashes.

?Given the far-reaching implications, it is morally imperative that this hypothesis be the subject of a truly scientific and impartial investigation by responsible authorities,? the four physicists conclude in the damning report.

The new report is the work of Steven Jones, former full professor of physics at Brigham Young University, Robert Korol, a professor emeritus of civil engineering at McMaster University in Ontario, Canada, Anthony Szamboti, a mechanical design engineer with over 25 years of structural design experience in the aerospace and communications industries and Ted Walter, the director of strategy and development for Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth, a nonprofit organization that today represents more than 2,500 architects and engineers.

The comprehensive report in Europhysics Magazine directly challenges the official narrative and lends to a growing body of evidence that seriously questions the veracity of the government narrative.

In 2002, the National Institute of Standards and Technology remarked that the case was exceptionally bizarre. There were no other known cases of total structural collapses in high-rise buildings caused by fires and so it is deeply unusual that it should have happened three times in the space of one day, noted NIST.

Official investigations have never been able to thoroughly and coherently explain how this might have happened and various teams tasked with examining the collapse have raised difficult questions about the veracity of the government?s story.

Source: https://thefreethoughtproject.com/physics-report-911-controlled-demolition/
 

Where is the plane? When was the picture taken?

And a plane hitting something solid going 500 mph virtually disintegrates to small pieces. I personally was on a B52 crash site two days after the crash, where the plane hit a mountain during a training exercise, the largest pieces were hundreds of yards away, they were pieces of tail and were about 2-3' square. At the actual impact site, there was nothing bigger than your foot left. In this case the big pieces are probably inside the pentagon or taken away by the NTSB to a warehouse.
 
Lots of unanswered questions - sad day -OD
 
Said from day one that they looked to be a controlled demo.In order for them to fall perfectly downward. No arguement can be made to justify the precise collapse (demolition) of the twin towers.
 
Where is the plane? When was the picture taken?

And a plane hitting something solid going 500 mph virtually disintegrates to small pieces. I personally was on a B52 crash site two days after the crash, where the plane hit a mountain during a training exercise, the largest pieces were hundreds of yards away, they were pieces of tail and were about 2-3' square. At the actual impact site, there was nothing bigger than your foot left. In this case the big pieces are probably inside the pentagon or taken away by the NTSB to a warehouse.

Really? I have seen the aftermath pics of planes hitting mountains and that is not true. Oh an there were approximately 80 cameras that would have had video footage... did you ever see a video of this "plane" hitting the Pentagon?
 
Back
Top