You won???t need hCG for only a 6 week cycle.. Id say anything longer and it would be a good idea though.
-Eric
What about the 8 weeks of Hdrol on top, or is that not suppressive enough?
Cheers.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You won???t need hCG for only a 6 week cycle.. Id say anything longer and it would be a good idea though.
-Eric
Yeah. Nice Goatee!are you using hcg at all?
I've still got a half of a bottle to finish. I would recommend this product to people who understand that it's not a serious mass builders. It's a safe an effective way to add some mass, lose some fat, and feel great with no adverse health effects.
If you are used to the instant gratification of a cycle of harsh orals every couple months, you may be disappointed with it.
Ideal scenario is this:
1) You've been hormone free for 3+ months or are a newb to prohormones.
and
2) You go through 2 bottles, using HCG while on.
With the above and the right diet, many will find 1-T greatly assist a recomp. I like it alot, although it isn't a big mass builder. The only sides have been benefits for me while on TRT.
Well, I finished the cycle a good while ago. A rough estimate would be that I gained and kept up to two pounds of muscle and lost 3 pounds of fat. Felt great with zero sides and bloodwork was fine.
The most profound benefit for me was the nutrient partitioning and a little hardening. I wan't disappointed, and I think a higher concentrate would have yielded better results. I had to apply a ton of lotion. It's a good option for newbies, but I've done a fair amount of gear in the past.
it won't be long before that is discovered and ruined. And the reality is if such a great product gets made we won't know about it....
1-TU and other old PS are a thing of the past. I think these supplement companies are grasping at straws trying to make a near steroid product. For the poor return on investment aspect of these compounds I wouldn't even consider taking them. There is no such thing as near gear anymore, and I think the laws governing this has made it near impossible to make something like the old PS ever again. It will have to be some crazy breakthrough in science that creates the next breed of steroids, and it won't be long before that is discovered and ruined. And the reality is if such a great product gets made we won't know about it...sport athletes will use it for years before anyone tries to market it to the general public for consumption.
19-nor (TREN) is pretty damn real and is a very potent anabolic. (only requires one conversion to become dienolone which has the same anabolic and androgenic binding affinity as nandrolone... although it tends to be more characteristic of trenbolone)
Odds are it will be banned within the next 6 months??? but then again, its been on the market for awhile and its been clean thus far???
-Eric
That is like saying 1-AD is just as good as taking 1-T...can you compare the two just because 1-AD is supposed to turn into 1-T? I took both and they are nothing close to the same at all.
Until someone that has taken tren before takes TREN and confims this product comes even close to the real thing I have to just label as mentioned before. If dienolone is similar to nandrolone, but plays out like trenbolone I have to question how this product didn't come from a shot in the dark that happened to do something.
Dienolone's structure is right inbetween nandrolone and trenbolone, but since it doesnt aromatize, its a bit more like trenbolone.
Dienolone is a readily available steroidial intermediate used in China to produce trenbolone. They just attach anther double bond to it to enhance the androgen/progestin binding affinity. (to make it as strong as possible for those heifers)
Ive used both trenbolone and the 19-nor dienolone precursor and I can say without a doubt that it is comparable??? but obviously not as powerful as tren??? but still plenty powerful to make very considerable gains.
-Eric
I have never used tren due to the high risk of increased anxiety. I have issues with anxiety/panic without gear so on most compounds I do get increased anxiety. Some worse then others but with the side effect being common with tren I have never used it. Do you have an opinion if "tren" the supplement has the same anxiety side effects as the real deal? If not maybe I would give it a run for 6-8 weeks to see what results are noted. I have not been very motivated to do another AAS cycle, but might try and keep an open mind.
I???ve actually never head of trenbolone causing ???anxiety???, but I know it causes ???aggression??? and ???sensitivity to things that make you annoyed?????? and our 1-T TREN seems to have the same effect???. Buts its not like an uncomfortable nervous anxiety time feel???. Its more of a motivation to do stuff type feel.
Hell if you are anxiety prone you may want to consider the Sustain Alpha. The 7,8-benzoflavone has some great anti-anxiety benefits.
-Eric