Hi guys.
I spoke to the guy who runs the gym I train in to see if he could point me in the right direction of anyone who can get me some gear. Test is all I was initially after. Anyway, we got talking about my experience with enhancers and the like and he stunned me with some of his comments.
Firstly, this guy has competed for years. He has also had countless of bodybuilders comes through his doors - some of which were/are IFBB pros. Therefore I assume he knows his stuff.
Secondly, I have only attained my AAS knowledge I have by reading books, magazines, blogs, and the stuff posted in this forum. Now, this doesn't make me an expert, granted, however, I like to think I've grasped the basics.
Which brings me to his feedback. I said that I was new to pinning and, although having dabbled with prohormones, have never run the rocket fuel that is test. Therefore, I was enquiring into getting some enanthate. The first thing he said was to avoid test like the plague. He said it fucks everyone up. He said you lose a lot of the gains and that something else would be a better option. He also thought my 500mg per week was far too much and that after six weeks, my receptors would be saturated therefore limiting my goals. He then went on to mention stacks. I can't remember specifically what he was saying now, but tren, deca and sus were all mentioned as options.
I explained that as it was my first time, I was reluctant to stack anything - particularly what I'd call the hardcore substances above.
So, my entire thinking and approach to AAS over the years has been shaped by what I read on here. And although lots of people have come and gone with their theories and experiences, the general consensus on first cycles is 500mg of test per week for 10, maybe 12, weeks - that test should always form the base of any cycle. At least to begin with, anyway.
I respect that. But I also respect the guy who runs my gym. However, my idea of what a first cycle should comprise seems to be vastly different from his.
I know this thread is probably a moot point as I've going to have to make a decision by myself - and that will probably be to go with what I've learnt from here - however, it would be good to see what you guys think. Is his advice as preposterous as I initially thought, or has he got a point? Is it purely a US v European stance on AAS? It would be good to get your thoughts.
Cheers.
I spoke to the guy who runs the gym I train in to see if he could point me in the right direction of anyone who can get me some gear. Test is all I was initially after. Anyway, we got talking about my experience with enhancers and the like and he stunned me with some of his comments.
Firstly, this guy has competed for years. He has also had countless of bodybuilders comes through his doors - some of which were/are IFBB pros. Therefore I assume he knows his stuff.
Secondly, I have only attained my AAS knowledge I have by reading books, magazines, blogs, and the stuff posted in this forum. Now, this doesn't make me an expert, granted, however, I like to think I've grasped the basics.
Which brings me to his feedback. I said that I was new to pinning and, although having dabbled with prohormones, have never run the rocket fuel that is test. Therefore, I was enquiring into getting some enanthate. The first thing he said was to avoid test like the plague. He said it fucks everyone up. He said you lose a lot of the gains and that something else would be a better option. He also thought my 500mg per week was far too much and that after six weeks, my receptors would be saturated therefore limiting my goals. He then went on to mention stacks. I can't remember specifically what he was saying now, but tren, deca and sus were all mentioned as options.
I explained that as it was my first time, I was reluctant to stack anything - particularly what I'd call the hardcore substances above.
So, my entire thinking and approach to AAS over the years has been shaped by what I read on here. And although lots of people have come and gone with their theories and experiences, the general consensus on first cycles is 500mg of test per week for 10, maybe 12, weeks - that test should always form the base of any cycle. At least to begin with, anyway.
I respect that. But I also respect the guy who runs my gym. However, my idea of what a first cycle should comprise seems to be vastly different from his.
I know this thread is probably a moot point as I've going to have to make a decision by myself - and that will probably be to go with what I've learnt from here - however, it would be good to see what you guys think. Is his advice as preposterous as I initially thought, or has he got a point? Is it purely a US v European stance on AAS? It would be good to get your thoughts.
Cheers.