ronnie vs. arnold

[dumbdumbdinkel3]

comments??

i know this probly belongs in another section but i forgot where i was at...

 

[clemson357]

arnold looks better all around. The only exception may be quads, but arnold's still have much better definition.

 

[GFR]

comments??

i know this probly belongs in another section but i forgot where i was at...

Well that pic was when Arnold was only 225....here he is at 240 and top shape

 

[fufu]

hahahahaha I love that Ronnie picture.

Yeah Arnold wins by a long shot.

 

[Doublebase]

Ronnie's back is sick.

 

[fufu]

Ronnie's back is sick.

Especially when you can see his gut hanging out on either side.

 

[Big Smoothy]

Coleman's size is impressive but his.......quads and bloated gut?

How many guys have you seen that have had Arnold's size and proportions and had a waist as narrow as Arnold?

 

[Seanp156]

Arnold has a much better shape overall x 9999999.

 

[33ecooks]

Ronnie hands down... but the shid he's on is more advanced then when Arnold was competing.

 

[musclepump]

Frank Zane.

 

[lnvanry]

Frank Zane.

.

 

[ultimo]

hahahahaha I love that Ronnie picture.

Yeah Arnold wins by a long shot.

me too !!!! think arnold was amazing in his day and still today!!!!

 

[NeilPearson]

Hulk Hogan

 

[Detroit_4_Life]

Hulk Hogan

LL COOL J

 

[fufu]

me too !!!! think arnold was amazing in his day and still today!!!!

I agree.

 

[Action-Jackson]

Well that pic was when Arnold was only 225....here he is at 240 and top shape

That is fucking crazy. Arnold for the win.

 

[GFR]

 

[LoadedBats]

Thats one of the best shots of him (Arnold that is.........not pregnant coleman). It's funny how the BB's of that era used the "vacuum" pose all the time to make the waist appear smaller.........somehow it's never used anymore......and if it is....the freaks aren't doing a very good job at it.

 

[bigjb1]

Arnold vs Ronnie

Doses have incresed dramatically, as has food intake, and science behind timing of meals and what / when to take in sugar is a bit different. The drugs haven't changed much, if at all. I wonder how Arnold would look if he had access to today's strats back then. A 6'2" 255-260lb Arnold would have been incredible. But it's all still the IF game. When I was about 10 years (or more) younger, I wanted to be a freak like Coleman is today, but I'm preferring the Arnold physique more and more now. Maybe its my joints... hehe.
J

 

[MCx2]

I look at it this way. If I had to choose who I would rather look like, it's Arnold hands down. Minus the ugly mug of course.

 

[GFR]

Doses have incresed dramatically, as has food intake, and science behind timing of meals and what / when to take in sugar is a bit different. The drugs haven't changed much, if at all. I wonder how Arnold would look if he had access to today's strats back then. A 6'2" 255-260lb Arnold would have been incredible. But it's all still the IF game. When I was about 10 years (or more) younger, I wanted to be a freak like Coleman is today, but I'm preferring the Arnold physique more and more now. Maybe its my joints... hehe.
J

 

[assassin]

coleman is a big fat ass i hate his body even when he's in shape he has a big gut and i don't like his over all......arnold rocks

 

[Arnold]

I don't think bodybuilders in Arnold's era were using hGH.

 

[Double D]

You really cant say one or the other is goin to win. Bodybuilding then and now are definitly 2 seperate things! Now days its as big as possible no matter what. Then it was more about symetry, and detail. Sure size was good to, but Arnold didnt have to be 300lbs. to win.

 

[assassin]

I don't think bodybuilders in Arnold's era were using hGH.

foreman posted old bbs photos , i liked them a lot, i think at this time there was no steroids or hormones used yet..am i right

 

[GFR]

foreman posted old bbs photos , i liked them a lot, i think at this time there was no steroids or hormones used yet..am i right

Steroids 1950-1980...1955 is when it beacme well known with athletes
GH 1981-now...not popular till late 1980's


Tom Platz IMO was the first to use it ( I wouild guess 1980 or so) and then Lee Haney when he went from 230 to 248 in less than a year ( 1983-1984)

 

[assassin]

Steroids 1950-1980...1955 is when it beacme well known with athletes
GH 1981-now...not popular till late 1980's


Tom Platz IMO was the first to use it ( I wouild guess 1980 or so) and then Lee Haney when he went from 230 to 248 in less than a year ( 1983-1984)

but they were not so big like the coleman generation .........what's the secret of this

 

[GFR]

but they were not so big like the coleman generation .........what's the secret of this

PLatz had legs as good or better than any pro today or ever. In 1983 or 4 when Haney started using all the new drugs it all was uncharted so it took decades to figure out how far you could take it.

 

[assassin]

PLatz had legs as good or better than any pro today or ever. In 1983 or 4 when Haney started using all the new drugs it all was uncharted so it took decades to figure out how far you could take it.

i hate coleman legs , in the pic u posted arnold had smaller guads but they had a much better shape and definition, when it comes to definition coleman = 0

arnold had the ideal formula.

 

[Mags]

Arnold has overall a better figure in proportion and simply in overall look. Ronnie, I'd admire for just being so huge and incredibly strong. His quad mass does kick the piss out of arnolds, but arnolds go better and as everyone else mentioned, they're more defined. Arnold still has some of the best biceps and chest when compared to bodybuilders today no matter who the contender is. I mean, look at the first photo, Ronnie possibly has bigger arms due to larger tri's but Arnolds Biceps actually look longer, fuller and overall BIGGER than Ronnies. Thats truly amazing and why arnold will always stand the test of time. I'd rather have arnolds physique any day.