• Hello, this board in now turned off and no new posting.
    Please REGISTER at Anabolic Steroid Forums, and become a member of our NEW community!
  • Check Out IronMag Labs® KSM-66 Max - Recovery and Anabolic Growth Complex

ronnie vs. arnold

Muscle Gelz Transdermals
IronMag Labs Prohormones
assassin said:
but they were not so big like the coleman generation .........what's the secret of this :hmmm:

HAVE YOU EVER SEEN TOM PLATZ'S LEGS??

1413_1.jpg


IGF-1, Insulin, GH, more knowledge regarding nutrition and stacking, plus the RIDICULOUS levels of abuse make this a sad era for BBin. I think Coleman looks like shit. Give me Sergio Olivia or Platz any day!!
 
Mags said:
Arnold has overall a better figure in proportion and simply in overall look. Ronnie, I'd admire for just being so huge and incredibly strong. His quad mass does kick the piss out of arnolds, but arnolds go better and as everyone else mentioned, they're more defined. Arnold still has some of the best biceps and chest when compared to bodybuilders today no matter who the contender is. I mean, look at the first photo, Ronnie possibly has bigger arms due to larger tri's but Arnolds Biceps actually look longer, fuller and overall BIGGER than Ronnies. Thats truly amazing and why arnold will always stand the test of time. I'd rather have arnolds physique any day.

Look at the length of his tendons running to Arnold's bicep! A high peak implies less bicep mass.

HERE's one of the greatest of all times: look how there's no peak, but his mass is probably to the tune of 20 percent denser if not more.

so45.jpg


attachment.php
 
hGH has ruined bodybuilding or to be more specific the torso portion.
 
maniclion said:
hGH has ruined bodybuilding or to be more specific the torso portion.

it is the bodybuilders who have ruined hgh!

if not abused to extremes has great effects
 
dumbdumbdinkel3 said:
it is the bodybuilders who have ruined hgh!

if not abused to extremes has great effects
Wrong again...the industry rewards it...so blame those in power son.
 
Blame everyone. Pro bodybuilding is a joke.
 
Duncans Donuts said:
Look at the length of his tendons running to Arnold's bicep! A high peak implies less bicep mass.

HERE's one of the greatest of all times: look how there's no peak, but his mass is probably to the tune of 20 percent denser if not more.

so45.jpg


attachment.php
And he also had more than a 20 inch taper between his relaxed waist and chest....something no bodybuilder can claim today. In his prime Sergios upper arm was 2/3 the size of his waist....no other man in the history of the world can make that claim. ;)
 
He is without a doubt my favorite. Sergio Olivia at his prime had everything: MASS, narrowness of waist, his famous "Y Taper" - perfect bodybuilding physique. Nobody else in history comes close in my opinion. People claimed his conditioning wasn't on par with today's competition - yeah, give that man DNP, HGH, the assortment of clen/t3 and other stacks and you'd see a man whooping everyones ass on the circuit today.

my goodness.
 
RONNIE LOSES OUT JUST BECAUSE THE GH MAKES HIS GUT BLOAT. OTHER WISE HIS LEGS ARE 2X THE SIZE OF ARNOLDS/ HIS ARMS ARE ABOUT THE SAME BUT they're more ripped.
 
bigjb1 said:
Doses have incresed dramatically, as has food intake, and science behind timing of meals and what / when to take in sugar is a bit different. The drugs haven't changed much, if at all. I wonder how Arnold would look if he had access to today's strats back then. A 6'2" 255-260lb Arnold would have been incredible. But it's all still the IF game. When I was about 10 years (or more) younger, I wanted to be a freak like Coleman is today, but I'm preferring the Arnold physique more and more now. Maybe its my joints... hehe.
J
My ultimate goal is to have as close a competitive physique as arnold's. I am the same in structure and build. I dont juice (I would but the teacher's salalry I'm on doesnt permit), I laso have great genetics family wise. arnold is sixty. he is still in good shape.
On the other hand, I cant take anything away from ronnie. I met the guy and he is true getleman. BUT, how long is he going to survive after bbing is over for him? His body has got to be fucked up permenantly. :hmmm:
 
arnie by far. also arnie at 225 looks better than arnie at 240
his expression and pose is so much cooler
 
overall, ahhnold, lee haney, bob paris, berry demey, lee labrada, shawn ray, darem charles and mike christian are probably the better bodybuilders than the mass monsters. They all have one thing in common-symmetry. Who gives a fuck about a striated ass or a the fact that you cant fit thru normal sized door? I just dont think the bloat is a point of where bbing should go. Its unreal to say the least, and these guys work hard-damn hard, but it just doesnt look like a real person. And what the fuck is with that big valley in the center ronnie's abs?
 
arnie looks like some kind of athletic god
ronnie looks like a greasy, constipated, pregnant hick...although, im not sure i'd say it to his face.

rc16.jpg

does my bum look big in this?
 
looks like ronnie has a small bit of gyno there HAHA
 
looking like you would pop if you stepped on a pin, is not a good look.
arnie looks solid
 
juggernaut said:
overall, ahhnold, lee haney, bob paris, berry demey, lee labrada, shawn ray, darem charles and mike christian are probably the better bodybuilders than the mass monsters. They all have one thing in common-symmetry. Who gives a fuck about a striated ass or a the fact that you cant fit thru normal sized door? I just dont think the bloat is a point of where bbing should go. Its unreal to say the least, and these guys work hard-damn hard, but it just doesnt look like a real person. And what the fuck is with that big valley in the center ronnie's abs?

Definitly need to add Flex Wheeler onto that list. He shouldve won the Olympia a few times and took 2nd.
 
Thats a hell of a thought. I believe it wouldve been different because they wouldve set the mold of what bb'ers should look like. Instead of the mega monster who has very little symetrics, it wouldve been a guy like Flex who was teetering around perfection.
 
dumbdumbdinkel3 said:
ronnie%20coleman(2002),%20arnold%20schwarzenegger(1975).jpg



comments??

i know this probly belongs in another section but i forgot where i was at...
this picture is bullshit u got a 140kg monster vs 110 kg does the weight difference really look that much in that pic no it doesnt,,,,if arnie in reality was standing next to ronnie there would be no comparison ronnie wins hands down
 
now im pretty sure u all think arnie has alot smaller waist than ronnie ,,get a ruler and measure there waists in that pic
 
arnies arms were 21 inches but they seem to look alot bigger than ronnies also that pic is bullshit
 
Sure Ronnie wins if he its in todays bodybuilding, but I think for the most part people think todays bodybuilding sucks. Todays bodybuilder just gets as big as possible with no reguards to any kind of symetry (spelled that damned word wrong like 10 times now). Like I was saying earlier theres no reason why ronnie ever beat Wheeler. Wheeler looks much better and I think 90% or better of the guys on this board would agree. Arnold is the man and theres no arguing that. Yes Ronnie is a enormous monster, but he has a midsection that goes along with that. I am sure that if Arnold shot all the hgh that ronnie takes then yeah Arnold would have been even bigger than Ronnie.
 
im just saying on that picture its not a fair comparison never mind all the off season pics,,but im sure arnie was 8% year round no doubt pfft
 
Back
Top