Phineas
Registered
Sorry about starting a new thread for such an old topic, but I thought this would be easier.
(1.) How long does it take to go in to ketosis? Wouldn't this theoretically be once I've burned up all glycogen in my body? Let's say I woke up and ate a bagel with my breakfast, containing 50g carbs, and it burned off by 10:00 AM. Wouldn't my body then begin to shift to alternative energy sources?
(2.) Why can't you achieve a similar state from a simple low-carb diet. Let's say my usual bulking carbs is 350g/day. If I decrease to 100g, so maybe a potato before a workout, a couple cups of milk, and a banana, but eat it all within an hour and a half of my training why wouldn't I be in ketosis before and after my workout, after burning off those carbs?
(3.) How does ketosis differ biologically from a low-carb diet? (i.e. 100g) For instance, what is going on in the body on low carb that's different than a ketogenic diet? You're still not providing your body with enough of its primary fuel source. Why wouldn't this still allow the body to shift at different times of the day into fat oxidation?
(4.) How can high-intensity training be properly performed when the body has no glycogen?
(5.) What measures must be taken to preserve muscle mass if taking a simpler low-carb approach as opposed to no carbs at all?
I've read many our respected members such as Merkaba, Cowpimp, and Ian Daniel stress the simpler approach of "calories in vs. calories out", and this is the approach I find much more realistic. I know that carbs aren't essential to life, but they're extremely helpful in our realm.
I've been trying to get my head around this ketosis stuff for a while. I'm even a couple days into an ketosis experiment where I'm eating under 30g carbs for a few days, and I feel like total shit. My workout yesterday was horrendous after the first couple sets. I felt sluggish and unmotivated.
I've read that some people function well in ketosis while others can't. I just need more information to be sold on what to me seems like such a risky, unhealthy approach. Even if ketones are an efficient source of fuel for the brain and muscles, so many people who have posted their results here on ketogenic diets have cited irritability and frustration.
Is this really the ideal approach to fat loss? Whatever happened to balanced diet with a simple modest calorie deficit?
(1.) How long does it take to go in to ketosis? Wouldn't this theoretically be once I've burned up all glycogen in my body? Let's say I woke up and ate a bagel with my breakfast, containing 50g carbs, and it burned off by 10:00 AM. Wouldn't my body then begin to shift to alternative energy sources?
(2.) Why can't you achieve a similar state from a simple low-carb diet. Let's say my usual bulking carbs is 350g/day. If I decrease to 100g, so maybe a potato before a workout, a couple cups of milk, and a banana, but eat it all within an hour and a half of my training why wouldn't I be in ketosis before and after my workout, after burning off those carbs?
(3.) How does ketosis differ biologically from a low-carb diet? (i.e. 100g) For instance, what is going on in the body on low carb that's different than a ketogenic diet? You're still not providing your body with enough of its primary fuel source. Why wouldn't this still allow the body to shift at different times of the day into fat oxidation?
(4.) How can high-intensity training be properly performed when the body has no glycogen?
(5.) What measures must be taken to preserve muscle mass if taking a simpler low-carb approach as opposed to no carbs at all?
I've read many our respected members such as Merkaba, Cowpimp, and Ian Daniel stress the simpler approach of "calories in vs. calories out", and this is the approach I find much more realistic. I know that carbs aren't essential to life, but they're extremely helpful in our realm.
I've been trying to get my head around this ketosis stuff for a while. I'm even a couple days into an ketosis experiment where I'm eating under 30g carbs for a few days, and I feel like total shit. My workout yesterday was horrendous after the first couple sets. I felt sluggish and unmotivated.
I've read that some people function well in ketosis while others can't. I just need more information to be sold on what to me seems like such a risky, unhealthy approach. Even if ketones are an efficient source of fuel for the brain and muscles, so many people who have posted their results here on ketogenic diets have cited irritability and frustration.
Is this really the ideal approach to fat loss? Whatever happened to balanced diet with a simple modest calorie deficit?