• Hello, this board in now turned off and no new posting.
    Please REGISTER at Anabolic Steroid Forums, and become a member of our NEW community!
  • Check Out IronMag Labs® KSM-66 Max - Recovery and Anabolic Growth Complex

The Definitive Pre, During, and Post Workout Nutrition Discussion Thread

Muscle Gelz Transdermals
IronMag Labs Prohormones
Water doesn't blunt cortisol...

During recovery, glycolysis is used to regenerate ATP. Sure, BCAAs could be used, but that isn't a very efficient process when you can just have glucose available...

The nutrient timing stuff is wrt endurance AND strength training. Most of the studies cited in it used strength training as the method of training in the experimental design. It compared water, a protein drink and the carb/protein mix. They were performed at University, sure products came out, but I am fairly certain a University isn't going to risk FDA compliance to sell a supplement, and full financial disclosure would be required to the IRB.
 
The smallest grant programs at the NIH are for sports nutrition and sports physiology. The Universities will pimp themselves out to do these so called studies in a heartbeat. Its really, really fucking hard to get grant money these days in non hardcore medicine grant programs.

LMAO!! Who the fuck do you think is going to "evaluate" the authenticity of these studies cited on this Accelerade website??

They're all general studies. The science is MINIMAL. These are not refereed hardcore journal articles. This is what we call "soft science". Even I have, from time to time, done soft science to help provide starter data for a hardcore grant proposal project.

BTW, dehydration does cause a rise in cortisol, so water used for hydration can be said to reduce cortisol response. But I didn't make that claim in any of my posts.

Also, the FDA doesn't care fuck all about these products, as long as they don't claim to treat a disease. They are over the counter electrolyte and sugar supplements. Not sure what regulations you are citing here. Labeling??
 
I'm with Robert (and some of our friends back at M2), in the belief that BCAAs might be a better source of cell signalling agents for directing energy metabolism during exertion. This would be consumed just before and during workout. A prior meal within a period of one 1.5 hours prior to workout would be needed to supply nutrients in plasma to muscle during workout.

Working presumption: a more sizeable, slower release format of peptides and energy equivalents is preferrable, within a period of approximately 45 min prior to workout, to simply using BCAAs, for those with glucose tolerance issues.


so in a nutshell w.r.t strength training you are suggesting:

prior: small meal ~60min out (whey + oat bran for instance...maybe a little fat) + some BCAA's

during: BCAA's

post: not clear on this.... just a meal (complex carb + slow digesting protein perhaps)....forget the Whey + fast carb hype/hooplah?

Just ran a marathon, played an intense pro level hockey game or trained for 4 hours....drink an electrolyte replenishment drink, otherwise....watch your waistline expand.
 
The smallest grant programs at the NIH are for sports nutrition and sports physiology. The Universities will pimp themselves out to do these so called studies in a heartbeat. Its really, really fucking hard to get grant money these days in non hardcore medicine grant programs.

LMAO!! Who the fuck do you think is going to "evaluate" the authenticity of these studies cited on this Accelerade website??

They're all general studies. The science is MINIMAL. These are not refereed hardcore journal articles. This is what we call "soft science". Even I have, from time to time, done soft science to help provide starter data for a hardcore grant proposal project.

BTW, dehydration does cause a rise in cortisol, so water used for hydration can be said to reduce cortisol response. But I didn't make that claim in any of my posts.

Also, the FDA doesn't care fuck all about these products, as long as they don't claim to treat a disease. They are over the counter electrolyte and sugar supplements. Not sure what regulations you are citing here. Labeling??


A GCP University cannot conduct non-GCP compliant clinical trials if they want NIH grants. Maybe 5-10 years ago they could, but not anymore. If I have a fully-funded NIH grant for cancer research, and the FDA auditor wants to go through the offices or clinics in OB/GYN, they can, it actually happened when I worked in OB/GYN. They went through my trial binder to make sure all the proper forms (FDA-1572, IND/IDE) were filled out and made sure all files were locked in a cabinet and they were not even there for my study.

The second the IRB receives a financial disclosure form indicating the researcher has a vested interest in the study, the compliance office is up their ass.

Simply put, a University isn't going to lose $15 million dollars in NIH grants because a researcher wants to sell a $20 supplement.

I don't get where you see the science is minimal, the book has like 200 citations from peer-reviewed journals, of which maybe 15 are from the authors. That is, if you consider the Journal of Nutrition, Journal of Applied Phys, American Journal of Phys, American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, and Medicine and Science in Sport and Exercise, among others, as scientific peer-reviewed journals. I would, in fact, consider it a very good example of the empirical method. Notice a trend in research, form a hypothesis, test it out, reformulate, test it out again, repeat as necessary.

I wasn't saying you said water blunts cortisol, what I was trying to say is that a carb/protein drink will blunt cortisol better than water in response to the claim that water is as effective at hydration. Hydration isn't the only concern during exercise, which was my point.
 
Ivy is a really good guy on the topic of sports nutrition.

Dale, can you post up some of the references (title, authors, journal, volume, number, date) so that i can see if I can get some of the abstracts. I may be able to get some of the full studies because I have access to thousands of journals for free through my school data base.
 
This thread rocks.
 
I was talking about the Accelerated website and their "research" page.

I have b no idea of the text source you are talking about, Dale. You don't bother to mention names.

? http://www.amazon.com/Nutrient-Timing-Future-Sports-Nutrition/dp/1591201411?

Our communication wires got crossed. I agree, no larger university would comprise its research dollars spent on NIH projects by sloppy paper handling of records persuant to the execution of NIH funded projects. The NIH does NOT dictate to universities their sources of extramural research activities that investigators may or maynot engage in. The experience you cite is common to any of us who have received federal grant dollars - its not only the NIH that makes demands on following code on paperwork (14 pages of standard boilerplate went on each and every grant proposal I submitted at my last insititution, another institution may cover its legal ass even more cautiously for projects requiring human subjects or animals).

Hydration stress is a form of stress. Cortisol is a form of stress response. You are mixing apples and oranges.

Gordo, I am saying that, unless your glucose tolerance is spot on, supplying fast release glucose as part of a pre-workout drink isn't a gpod idea. You will supply *low dose* trickle of glucose via amino acid conversion within a whey drink if its consumed 45 min- 1 hour before exertion. How well you utilize that glucose in response to energy demand depends on your ability to shuttle it into cells and transport to the appropriate intracellular locations for aerobic metabolism.

Recent studies of marathon running suggests that prolonged intense exertion induces cortisol regardless of pre WO supplementation. Supplementation may blunt the response, but the degree of response is dictated by HPA NE sensitivity, hydration and glucose status during and immediately after exertion, and exertion characteristics, coupled with energy metabolism efficiency (including recent history).
 
Recent studies of marathon running suggests that prolonged intense exertion induces cortisol regardless of pre WO supplementation. Supplementation may blunt the response, but the degree of response is dictated by HPA NE sensitivity, hydration and glucose status during and immediately after exertion, and exertion characteristics, coupled with energy metabolism efficiency (including recent history).

Do you have a cite to that?

the idea of a pre exercise carb load prior to a marathon, or during, has more to do with supplying the body with large amounts of energy than it does with blunting cortisol during the race itself.
 
http://rheumatology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/full/40/6/610

The response of the novel pro-inflammatory molecules S100A8/A9 to exercise.
Int J Sports Med. 2006 Sep;27(9):751-8.

Risk of Upper Respiratory Tract Infection in Athletes: An Epidemiologic and Immunologic Perspective. J Athl Train. 1997 Oct;32(4):344-349.

A half-marathon and a marathon run induce oxidative DNA damage, reduce antioxidant capacity to protect DNA against damage and modify immune function in hobby runners. Redox Rep. 2005;10(6):325-31.

Cortisol response to exercise and post-exercise suppression of blood lymphocyte subset counts. Int J Sports Med. 1996 Nov;17(8):597-603.

The effects of plasma cortisol elevation on total and differential leukocyte counts in response to heavy-resistance exercise. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1996;73(1-2):93-7.

Many other related papers. Last two indicate differential cortisol response among test populations are linked to the patterns of leukocyte counts (including pathologic B-cell differentiation associated with unusual liver lipid profiles - this is discussed elsewhere in more recent (2005) research lit that I have following for Devlin).
 
where in any of those studies does it talk about pre-exercise supplementation blunting cortisol?

yes, running a marathon places the body under stress.

Only one of your studies even had marathon runners. The other was on a UBE.


Regardless, you need to be loading up on carbs if you are going to do any type of proplonged exercises like run a marathon. You would be crazy not to!
 
Gordo, I am saying that, unless your glucose tolerance is spot on, supplying fast release glucose as part of a pre-workout drink isn't a gpod idea. You will supply *low dose* trickle of glucose via amino acid conversion within a whey drink if its consumed 45 min- 1 hour before exertion. How well you utilize that glucose in response to energy demand depends on your ability to shuttle it into cells and transport to the appropriate intracellular locations for aerobic metabolism.

Recent studies of marathon running suggests that prolonged intense exertion induces cortisol regardless of pre WO supplementation. Supplementation may blunt the response, but the degree of response is dictated by HPA NE sensitivity, hydration and glucose status during and immediately after exertion, and exertion characteristics, coupled with energy metabolism efficiency (including recent history).

Okay got it.

drink an electrolyte replenishment drink, otherwise....watch your waistline expand.

Whoops that didn't come out right....what I was inferring was that you felt that an electrolyte drink is not utilized properly for strength training puposes or is simply not required for strength training purposes (I would tend to agree). However, endurance....most definitely and perhaps optimal.
 
Patrick, conversation got sidelined here: the mention of excess stress (cortisol) not being blunted no matter what the pre-event supplementation regimine is valid, since that supplementation benefit will typically expire long before the event is completed.

This is a logical conclusion, supported by numerous studies of excessive immune system perturbation from prolonged intense exertion effort.

This forum is not about edurance training and endurance sports, its about strength training. Perhaps it might be best that comments made about exertion types not common to strength training programs be noted in context to avoid confusion.
 
Patrick, conversation got sidelined here: the mention of excess stress (cortisol) not being blunted no matter what the pre-event supplementation regimine is valid, since that supplementation benefit will typically expire long before the event is completed.

This is a logical conclusion, supported by numerous studies of excessive immune system perturbation from prolonged intense exertion effort.

This forum is not about edurance training and endurance sports, its about strength training. Perhaps it might be best that comments made about exertion types not common to strength training programs be noted in context to avoid confusion.

Oh, don't worry, lol....I am not about endurance training. :laugh:

I just thought it started as pre/during/post workout nutrition for BBers or those physique minded, then it moved towards some strength training and then we started to get on topic of marathons and endurance training so I thought it was headed that way.
 
Oh, don't worry, lol....I am not about endurance training. :laugh:

I just thought it started as pre/during/post workout nutrition for BBers or those physique minded, then it moved towards some strength training and then we started to get on topic of marathons and endurance training so I thought it was headed that way.

Correct, we were talking about physique, not strength or endurance.
 
Okay then a quick question....does anyone think that a person would have to alter the workout nutrition based on the time of day when you workout? Especially with respect to cortisol reponse and it's effects on body composition?

ie: what is effective in the morning after 7- 8 hours of sleep and no additional feeding past bedtime versus several meals leading up to an evening workout?

as an example
Shall we kick it off? My personal opinion, based on limited research I have seen, and anecdotal feedback of my self and many others tells me that FOR BODY COMPOSITION, the following is the best approach for MOST:

Pre = EAAs and a small amount of simple carbs (20g or so).

During = if anything, BCAAs

Post = whey, plus a slow released protein (prefer casien) plus some simple carbs (10-15 grams) plus some slower released carbs.

Is that for a morning workout or evening workout? Does anyone think it would matter? Just curious?
 
I lift in the morning. But it would be fine for a midday workout if you haven't eaten for a few hours.
 
Correct, we were talking about physique, not strength or endurance.

I guess we are talking about physique. I thought we were just talking about exercise in general....no matter what the goal. But, I guess I am wrong.
 
I guess we are talking about physique. I thought we were just talking about exercise in general....no matter what the goal. But, I guess I am wrong.

We can talk about anything we want, its a discussion forum. But my original post and recommendation was solely in regards to physique. My recommendations would vary depending on goal.
 
Muscle Gelz Transdermals
IronMag Labs Prohormones
Correct, we were talking about physique, not strength or endurance.

Negatory. We are talking about exertion. Marathon running and extreme intensity/high volume training bear some semblence to each other, in terms of the consequences of elevated insulin response in the post exertion window.

We are talking about strength training or at least, I am. I also believe it prudent for us to include moderate cardio training. One chooses pre-workout supplements accordingly. Our point is to differentiate among various types of pre-workout supplements and to help readers understand the relationship between energetic, anabolic, and recovery/repair cellular responses and the action of various pre-workout supplements that influence performance and exertion result.
 
Any thoughts on Citrulline malate in Pre/workout drinks?


To answer this question, we need to consider the actions of citrulline. The first is its action as a neurochemical.

Nitric Oxide and glutamate neurotransmitter receptors

A. Glutamate Receptors: ligand gated ion channels
2 types, characterized by pharmacology:

a. NMDA: Na+ and Ca+2, slow response, requires glutamate and glycine
b. Kainate: Na+, fast response, requires glutamate only

(both kinds co-mingle in same postsynaptic membrane)

B. nitric oxide (NO)
small, highly diffusible substrate

N-hydroxy-L-arginine > NO + L-cirtulline by NOS (nitric oxide synthetase)

NO produced in POST-synaptic cell

NOS activated by Ca+2 through NMDA receptor

Oh fucking oh. Ca+2 is modulated by glutmate/NMDA receptors in brain and CNS..

So, for CNS nerve activity in brain and body, two types of chemistry drive neurochemistry: ATP and Ca+2, for the two dominant ion-gated channel types (ACh = acetylcholine and glutamate)

Now comes the hammer: citrulline, arginine and glutamate metabolism are HIGHLY interconnected. From wikipedia:

"Arginine is synthesized from citrulline by the sequential action of the cytosolic enzymes argininosuccinate synthetase (ASS) and argininosuccinate lyase (ASL). This is energetically costly, as the synthesis of each molecule of argininosuccinate requires hydrolysis of adenosine triphosphate (ATP) to adenosine monophosphate (AMP); i.e., two ATP equivalents.

*important note: if you have FUCKED UP GLUCOS METABOLISM, you are ATP IMPAIRED. THIS DIRECTLY EFFECTS ARGININE <--> CITRULLINE <---> GLUTAMATE interconversion. (leads to a pile up citrulline and glutamate)

Citrulline can be derived from multiple sources:

* from arginine via nitric oxide synthase (NOS);
* from ornithine via catabolism of proline or glutamine/glutamate;
* from asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA) via DDAH.

The pathways linking arginine, glutamine, and proline are bidirectional. Thus, the net utilization or production of these amino acids is highly dependent on cell type and local metabolic demands.

On a whole-body basis, synthesis of arginine occurs principally via the intestinal???renal axis, wherein epithelial cells of the small intestine, which produce citrulline primarily from glutamine and glutamate, collaborate with the proximal tubule cells of the kidney, which extract citrulline from the circulation and convert it to arginine, which is returned to the circulation. Consequently, impairment of small bowel or renal function can reduce endogenous arginine synthesis, thereby increasing the dietary requirement.

ONE FUCKING HALF OF THE ADULT POPULATION HAS THIS PROBLEM BY AGE 40 and > 20% HAVE THIS PROBLEM IN THEIR EARLY 20. Arginine/citrulline supplementation is a double edged sword. If YOU FUCKING CAN"T CONVERT CITRULLINE TO ARGININE, YOU CRANK OUT MEGA QUANTITIES OF GLUTAMATE.

You also upregulate ACh activity, and thus ---> excitotoxic neurochemistry in brain and body. This has important consequences.

--> Kenwood knows this, this is the problem he is having with his NO-inducer addiction.

Synthesis of arginine from citrulline also occurs at a low level in many other cells, and cellular capacity for arginine synthesis can be markedly increased under circumstances that also induce iNOS.

Thus, citrulline, a coproduct of the NOS-catalyzed reaction, can be recycled to arginine in a pathway known as the citrulline-NO or arginine-citrulline pathway. I mention this above, in the CNS activation discussion.

"This is demonstrated by the fact that in many cell types, citrulline can substitute for arginine to some degree in supporting NO synthesis. However, recycling is not quantitative because citrulline accumulates along with nitrate and nitrite, the stable end-products of NO, in NO-producing cells "

Bottom line: for a fairly large subset of the population with normal glucose metabolism and a lack of predominating excitatory (cause by an apparent inborn problem with glutamate translocation and norepinephrine supersensitivity to stress, which releases glutamte and Ca+2 in excessive quantities in the brain, gut, kidneys and body CNS), then citrulline supplementation will be salutory - in ortherwords, beneficial, when not used excessively.

For a smaller subset of the population that has excitatory neurochemical issues, this is not good chemical karma. At best, it should be used sparingly, at worst, avoided completely.

I hope you can follow this argument. Its an important one to consider for use of both NO-inducers and citrulline malate.
 
Negatory. We are talking about exertion. Marathon running and extreme intensity/high volume training bear some semblence to each other, in terms of the consequences of elevated insulin response in the post exertion window.

We are talking about strength training or at least, I am. I also believe it prudent for us to include moderate cardio training. One chooses pre-workout supplements accordingly. Our point is to differentiate among various types of pre-workout supplements and to help readers understand the relationship between energetic, anabolic, and recovery/repair cellular responses and the action of various pre-workout supplements that influence performance and exertion result.

Me thinks you are forgetting who started this thread. Go check. ;)

Again, I would make different PRACTICAL recommendations for different athletes, with different somatotypes.
 
I would make different PRACTICAL recommendations for different athletes, with different somatotypes.

Agreed. I think we are making the same point, Steve, except that in order for strength athletes to hit performance marks, they need to have their glucose tolerance in hand, and that requires cardiovascular conditioning workouts.

Strength and endurance are two different animals. Strength and cardio conditioning are part of the same training coin for strength (and some track and field event) athletes.

Gordo has brought up a good point on cortisol and time of day effects on training and supplementation.

Worth discussing, yes or no?
 
Its not terribly exciting. I think the timing of your workouts is really less important. Some train better early, some train better late in the day. I have trained a 5am, 9am, 1pm, 7pm, and even later for stints. Unless you are eating right before the gym, supplementation can and should be close to the same for OPTIMAL results.

Again, when physique is not the primary goal, athletes should be consuming more carbs. The types of carbs and the amounts depend on somatotypes, but you want carbs available pre (to use) and post (to replensih).

I am not terrible bothered by the elevated cortisol from the physical stress of training. Unless you are talking about marathons, or marathon workouts, this is a normal reaction to a normal environmental stress. Its part of growth and recovery.
 
Questions:


CEE should be Pre WO, Post WO, or Both?
Fast Carbs should be Pre WO, Post WO, or Both?
Protein should be Pre WO, Post WO, or Both?
Slow Carbs should be Pre WO, Post WO, or Both?
Other Supps should be Pre WO, Post WO, or Both?

I'm guessing the answer is both to all of the questions.
 
TP: Gross oversimilification on cortisol and insulin effects. Physique, sir, is that which you attain FROM training. You either encourage Type I (endurance, with low priority on mass and strength), for equal measure of Type I and mixed type II (mixture of strength and hypertrophy) or you train for predominantly type II (strength, PL). You eat and train accordingly.

You train best at the hour of the day that suits your energy/chronotype. Nightowls who push their bodyclocks back will carry a flatter and broader peak of cortisol in the morning, and will have a brief energy lag in afternoon, with an energy rise in evening. No brainer when they should workout.

Earlybirds who keep to a more normal sleep schedule, encourage an earlier, more abrupt rise, and sharper peaked cortisol release pattern, with a much steeper decay, more normal energy patterns throughout the afternoon, and have less energy in the evening hours.

Cortisol response threshold (from training, the amount of excess stress allowed before cortisol excess reduces recovery efficiency) varies by chronotype. Chronotype directly effects energy metabolism efficiency and CNS baseline response (highly sensitive to stress versus relatively nonsensitive, with respect to NE release), and also effects acetylcholine baseline as well (therefore, it also affects aggression and irritability, and also suseptabilit to CNS damage from oxidative stress during workouts).

So we have a basic difference of opinion on the value of accounting for innate cortisol response to training, training time of day, and influence of circadian rhythms/lifestyle. I submit that these are important factors and should be considered alongside cardiovascular training, macro- and micronutrient supply by diet (with careful attention to metabolic type) and stress management (rest, relaxation, and stress reduction).
 
Questions:


CEE should be Pre WO, Post WO, or Both?
Fast Carbs should be Pre WO, Post WO, or Both? Depends*
Protein should be Pre WO, Post WO, or Both?
Slow Carbs should be Pre WO, Post WO, or Both?
Other Supps should be Pre WO, Post WO, or Both?

I'm guessing the answer is both to all of the questions.

*Fast carbs should be used in very limited doses for insulin insensitive types.
 
TP: Gross oversimilification on cortisol and insulin effects.

Did you expect anything less? Practically speaking -- I still maintain I a right.
 
To answer this question, we need to consider the actions of citrulline...

Bottom line: for a fairly large subset of the population with normal glucose metabolism and a lack of predominating excitatory (cause by an apparent inborn problem with glutamate translocation and norepinephrine supersensitivity to stress, which releases glutamte and Ca+2 in excessive quantities in the brain, gut, kidneys and body CNS), then citrulline supplementation will be salutory - in ortherwords, beneficial, when not used excessively.

For a smaller subset of the population that has excitatory neurochemical issues, this is not good chemical karma. At best, it should be used sparingly, at worst, avoided completely.

I hope you can follow this argument. Its an important one to consider for use of both NO-inducers and citrulline malate.

Yowza, thanks for the indepth, slightly mind-cramping answer :thumb:

So for some, what's supposed to bring intensity to the gym is actually robbing you of your energy stores?
So how does one figure out what their glucose sensitivty is like? Other than a glucose monitor and fasted and non-fasted testing, I can't see any other way.

================================
I defintely adapted to my a.m. workouts, personally. By evening I can literally feel my body throttle down.

However I have to eat in the morning prior to my workouts otherwise a fasted literally makes me feel ill. I look white, get light-headed and kind feel like crap in general (low blood sugar at that point I'm guessing). Working out on a full stomach is less problematic for me. Ditto with cardio of all types.

When I used to workout in the evening, so long as my regular meals were setup okay...there was no real pre-requiste for an intentional preworkout nutrition. Mind you I guess when eating every 3 or so hours it falls under pre-workout simply because of timing.

Bottom line for me is a fasted workout is a no-no.


I will say how I felt after workouts in the p.m. is a lot different than the a.m. Evening workouts, I didn't feel like I needed much if any PWO followup. A.M. workouts...I do feel a need for immediate PWO replenishment. Nothing scientific to back that up though, just a 'feel' thing.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top