• Hello, this board in now turned off and no new posting.
    Please REGISTER at Anabolic Steroid Forums, and become a member of our NEW community!
  • Check Out IronMag Labs® KSM-66 Max - Recovery and Anabolic Growth Complex

What is 1-AD?

min0 lee

Senior Member
Elite Member
Joined
Oct 9, 2004
Messages
14,803
Reaction score
1,587
Points
113
Age
60
Location
The Bronx, NYC
What is it?
What does it do?
How natural is it?
Would it harm my Liver and kidney?
Where can I get it?
How much?
Is Var really a midget?
 
min0 lee said:
What is it?
What does it do?
How natural is it?
Would it harm my Liver and kidney?
Where can I get it?
How much?
Is Var really a midget?
It is a steroid, or a pro hormone or whatever supp companies wanna call it. It is a androgen (male hormone). It is not natural to supp your body with hormones, but I will admit there are worse things you could be doing or adding to up body.

It is unlikely 1-ad will harm your liver, kidneys, whatever, but the possibility for a negative interaction with the drug is always a possibility. I have never touched any of the OTC juice but all my buddies have tried it and most are not impressed with any of it. Too many sides, not enough gains.

If you are interested in 1-ad you can find it anywhere; prices vary so shop around.

Var could be a midget, who the fuck cares.
 
madden player said:
It is a steroid, or a pro hormone or whatever supp companies wanna call it. It is a androgen (male hormone). It is not natural to supp your body with hormones, but I will admit there are worse things you could be doing or adding to up body.

It is unlikely 1-ad will harm your liver, kidneys, whatever, but the possibility for a negative interaction with the drug is always a possibility. I have never touched any of the OTC juice but all my buddies have tried it and most are not impressed with any of it. Too many sides, not enough gains.

If you are interested in 1-ad you can find it anywhere; prices vary so shop around.

Var could be a midget, who the fuck cares.
1-AD is not a steroid. It is a pro-hormone and it is not the title that a company gives it. Pro-hormones are converted to testosterone. Don't let opinons of uninformed people scare you away from PH/PS use. Yes there can be unwanted side effects, but 1-AD is one of the safest PH's and if you are informed and run a cycle safely you will not see any permanent side effects. Read the PH/PS sticky for more info.
 
gococksDJS said:
1-AD is not a steroid. It is a pro-hormone and it is not the title that a company gives it. Pro-hormones are converted to testosterone. Don't let opinons of uninformed people scare you away from PH/PS use. Yes there can be unwanted side effects, but 1-AD is one of the safest PH's and if you are informed and run a cycle safely you will not see any permanent side effects. Read the PH/PS sticky for more info.
Where did the term Pro-hormone come from?? When I was in school, Androstenedione was an androgen (male sex hormone- or steroid); Hell, I was also under the impression that Dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) was a steriod; the term pro hormone was not even around when I was in school. The fact that these sometimes mild androgens ie. 1-androdiol (a hormone that has masculinizing effects) have to be converted to a more powerful steroid in the body means that they are not 'real' steroids/androgens/male sex hormones??

I am sorry but my definition of 'steroid' will never change.
 
Pro hormones are any substance that has to be converted in the liver to form test. A pro-steriod or steriod does not have to be converted because it is already active form.
 
madden player said:
Where did the term Pro-hormone come from?? When I was in school, Androstenedione was an androgen (male sex hormone- or steroid); Hell, I was also under the impression that Dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) was a steriod; the term pro hormone was not even around when I was in school. The fact that these sometimes mild androgens ie. 1-androdiol (a hormone that has masculinizing effects) have to be converted to a more powerful steroid in the body means that they are not 'real' steroids/androgens/male sex hormones??

I am sorry but my definition of 'steroid' will never change.
Well obviously your definition of steroid and the actual definition of steroid are different, but i wonder which one is incorrect?
 
dg806 said:
Pro hormones are any substance that has to be converted in the liver to form test. A pro-steriod or steriod does not have to be converted because it is already active form.

Some conversion still has to take place doesn't it? If it didn't it would already be test in the bottle.
 
topolo said:
Some conversion still has to take place doesn't it? If it didn't it would already be test in the bottle.
Nope............M1T is a Steriod. Just a legal loophole that was not covered under the original steriod bill.
 
Muscle Gelz Transdermals
IronMag Labs Prohormones
topolo said:
Some conversion still has to take place doesn't it? If it didn't it would already be test in the bottle.

No.

A prohormone is not an active hormone. It will have no hormonal effect on the body unless it is connverted to an active hormone. In most cases, there are enzymes in the body that convert the PH to the active hormone. So if you take 100 mg of a PH, not all of it will be converted, and if you don't have the proper enzymes, you will not convert any.

A steroid is a type of hormone that does not need conversion. It is already active. And androgen steroid, is a hormone that will exert androgenic effects (enhance male characteristics). An anabolic steroid is one that exherts anabolic effects. And androgenic anabolic steroid is one that does both -- this is just about every steroid used by bodybuilders. They are not all "test".

1-AD or 1-androstendiol is a PH that converts to 1-testosterone, which is an active hormone (a steroid).
 
Twin Peak said:
1-AD or 1-androstendiol is a PH that converts to 1-testosterone, which is an active hormone (a steroid).
I'm glad someone finally pointed this out. How could people think it converts to testosterone? :hmmm:
 
Twin Peak said:
No.

A prohormone is not an active hormone. It will have no hormonal effect on the body unless it is connverted to an active hormone. In most cases, there are enzymes in the body that convert the PH to the active hormone. So if you take 100 mg of a PH, not all of it will be converted, and if you don't have the proper enzymes, you will not convert any.

A steroid is a type of hormone that does not need conversion. It is already active. And androgen steroid, is a hormone that will exert androgenic effects (enhance male characteristics). An anabolic steroid is one that exherts anabolic effects. And androgenic anabolic steroid is one that does both -- this is just about every steroid used by bodybuilders. They are not all "test".

1-AD or 1-androstendiol is a PH that converts to 1-testosterone, which is an active hormone (a steroid).


I understand this but I was always under the impression that even M1t underwent some change after passing through
 
PirateFromHell said:
I'm glad someone finally pointed this out. How could people think it converts to testosterone? :hmmm:


I think it is easy for one to make this leap because of the fact your body shuts down natural test production presumably because it thinks the body is already flooded with test.

That, I believe is the logic behind the thought.
 
Thanks for the info guys, I was looking for something that would help me but something that won't tax my weak liver.
 
du510 said:
AD = anno domini. Not "after death". He died in 33 A.D. Whos the dipshit?
:haha:
 
topolo said:
you are, go back and reread how time was tracked back then
Yes, the calander was different, but AD = anno domini. The term was used to mean the year of our lord. Despite differences on when exactly Jesus was born, the year 1AD should be approximately Christ's first year as a mortal man on this earth.
 
PirateFromHell said:
Yes, the calander was different, but AD = anno domini. The term was used to mean the year of our lord. Despite differences on when exactly Jesus was born, the year 1AD should be approximately Christ's first year as a mortal man on this earth.

Thank You.
 
PirateFromHell said:
Yes, the calander was different, but AD = anno domini. The term was used to mean the year of our lord. Despite differences on when exactly Jesus was born, the year 1AD should be approximately Christ's first year as a mortal man on this earth.
:yes:
 
topolo said:
not according to jews for Jesus :)
"Jews for Jesus" Is this a new Hybrid religion??
:no:

Either way, they live by the same calander now; unless they're in China :)

Jesus was Jewish.So was Hitler. Bill Gates probably doesnt even know hes Jewish : ) (OK, OK, j/k, j/k!!!!)
 
Jews for Jesus basically believe in Jesus, buy still adhere to most of the Jewish laws & practices.

My understanding of them anyway. :)
 
Back
Top