At present I've sprained my wrist so am out of training for a good few weeks so I will probably lose nearly 9-11lbs as I won't be training and won't be keeping up the calories as intense ( i just can't get motivated or fit in all the eating when i don't train regulary, no real appetite etc ). However, when I'm back I reckon it'll only take me a month or so to pack on those lost pounds by loading back on the calories and creatine. What I'm getting at is I should be around 14 1/2 stone again once resuming training, and want to get to a good 15 stone before I start doing an AS cycle. I've read interviews etc with Lee Priest and Flex Wheeler, both of whom were criticising new upcomming BBs for not having the strong thick muscle older pro's had when they originally came through the ranks, believing the source of the problem to be that newer BBs were using steroids earlier on and not having the foundation base of muscle from years of previous training naturally. I just want your guys opinion. This will be my fourth year training, I started at 11 stone and my heaviest has been like the above, 14 1/2stone. Obviously the first months generated great gains then like probably everyone, I hit plateaus, got through them, but as it goes on growing got harder and slower. I keep increasing calories ( as this may have been a hinderance in the past as am now just over 4000cal/ED ) but I just don't seem to be growing so much now. Does this sound like a time to maybe do a cycle, or shall I keep trying to get bigger naturally first, so to have that bigger base weight to start from? Am I the only dude on here that writes a book each time I post?