DOMS..Thank You!!! I knew it was BAD, But not that bad... I work @ Walmarts near Detroit, I mean Spicoit. I work in the TOY dept., hence the username....Of ALL the non-whites that come into my dept. the spics, uhhh I mean people of Hispanic descent...HELL, my new name for THEM is "SPIGS", because their kids are sooooo messy & discusting...I'll be watching them, and they won't even put a toy back when they KNOW they are being WATCHED...how BRAZEN & CRASS. I could go on& on, but DON'T GET ME STARTED.....(oh,yeah,we have plenty of Arabs & Negroes too, no real problem, just normal kids, xcept some Arabs, girls with clothes over their faces...extreme MUSLIMS!!!) It's late her, I'm rambling... G'night
-
Hello, this board in now turned off and no new posting.
Please REGISTER at Anabolic Steroid Forums, and become a member of our NEW community!
-
Check Out IronMag Labs® KSM-66 Max - Recovery and Anabolic Growth Complex
Arizona them dirty spic,jews
- Thread starter Dark Geared God
- Start date
Oh, yeah, It seems like half of the S's are ILLEGAL 'cause they can't even speak English, theit KIDS translate for them... I'd LOVE to get ICE??? in there, or is it Homeland security?? Help me out... need to call the right cops!!! Hope noone rats me out to management!!!
petphotos
Registered
A few years ago, Oklahoma put in a law aimed at illegals and then saw many leaving the state to more tolerant areas. I have an old friend who spent years in Southern California and is now back in Oklahoma and he is thrilled by this way of handling of the problem.
I just spent 8 years in Southern Texas and had to deal with the Border and illegals every day. Others in the country don't have a clue. Ask the residents of El Paso about this.
I just spent 8 years in Southern Texas and had to deal with the Border and illegals every day. Others in the country don't have a clue. Ask the residents of El Paso about this.
GearsMcGilf
Registered
JFC! I'm fukkin scared to let my kids go in any w-mart toy dept now, knowing toyman might be in there.
GearsMcGilf
Registered
At the end of the day, we all know there is only one solution and it's not more racist legislation. We are all world citizens regardless of nationalities.
Jane Guskin: Amnesty NOW: How and Why
Most analysts agree that the chances of immigration reform in the first year or two of Obama's administration are extremely slim. We can't expect politicians and policymakers to take action. The change we want to see has to come from below.
We can make it happen if we unite around a common goal: swift, practical, inclusive legalization NOW, as a first step, and eliminate the backlog for people whose immigration cases are in process. Bring people out of the shadows, resolve their status, reunite their families. (And don't worry about what to call it -- amnesty, legalization, regularization, path to citizenship, etc. We know what we're talking about, and we're not fooling our opponents by coming up with new names for it.)
A simple bill we could get behind might look something like this:
1) Change the "registry date" in the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), currently set at January 1, 1972, to January 1, 2006. That will allow anyone here since that date to apply for residency through the relatively straightforward registry process.
2) Restore Section 245(i) of the INA, which lets people who entered the U.S. without permission adjust their immigration status here without having to first return home and face the punitive 10-year bar. Section 245(i) has been lapsed since 2000, leaving millions of people without options to legalize.
3) Get rid of the national origin quotas on family-based petitions and expand the total number of family-based visas available, so people don't have to wait 20 years to reunite with their relatives.
4) Pass the Child Citizen Protection Act, which restores the power of judges to weigh the impact on children when considering the deportation of a parent.
Those four steps will provide options for a huge number of people, including those who would benefit from measures like the DREAM Act (undocumented youth) or AgJobs (farmworkers.) If we're strong enough, we can also win the Uniting American Families Act (equal immigration rights for same-sex couples), a repeal of the harsh 1996 laws, an end to employer sanctions and other badly-needed measures.
We can win these changes now if we:
- Mobilize, organize, march, petition. We need mobilizations twice as big as the ones we saw between Valentine's Day and May Day in 2006, in the months after the House passed anti-immigrant bill HR4437. Those mobilizations changed the whole climate in Washington, leading the Senate to approve a package that included AgJobs and the Dream Act. Unfortunately, the mobilizations didn't continue past May 1, 2006, and the measures approved by the Senate never made it through the House.
- Don't wait. The sooner we act, the sooner we'll see results. By the time Obama's administration passes the 100-day mark on May 1, millions of people should be marching in the streets and calling or visiting their members of Congress.
- Dialogue. Slogans and soundbites won't convince people who aren't already on our side. We need to get people talking to each other about immigration, sharing thoughts and experiences, working through fears and doubts and taking a deeper look at the root causes.
Let's not forget that Congress, not the president, has power over immigration. We don't need to convince Obama, we just need to make sure that the Democrats in Congress understand that they will benefit from swiftly passing a measure to legalize the undocumented -- and they will pay a price if they don't. Latino voters were key in this latest election, and even though many Latinos are not immigrants and many immigrants are not Latino, a large number of US-born Latinos have immigrant relatives, have experienced anti-immigrant racism and are sympathetic to immigrants. Most naturalized immigrant voters are also sympathetic, having struggled through the system themselves.
Inclusive legalization can consolidate the demographic shift of rural America and permanently change the electoral map. Many of the rural areas which overwhelmingly voted for McCain include substantial immigrant populations -- often working in agriculture, meatpacking or other industries -- which have been clamoring for legalization. In Finney County, southwestern Kansas, fewer than 10,000 people voted in this year's presidential election, and McCain beat Obama by 35 percentage points (67%-32%). Yet on April 10, 2006, an estimated 3,000 to 4,000 people rallied for legalization in Garden City, the county seat, out of a total population of around 30,000. McCain won with similar numbers in nearby Ford County, where several thousand people rallied for immigration reform in the county seat, Dodge City, in April 2006. Over in Madison County, Nebraska, with just over 13,500 voters, McCain won 69%-30%; on April 10, 2006, the Tyson Fresh Meats pork plant in the county seat, Madison, had to shut down because so many of its employees walked out to demand legalization. McCain won with 62% of just over 20,000 votes in Hall County, Nebraska, where on May 1, 2006, hundreds marched in the county seat, Grand Island, for immigrant rights.
It's clear in the minds of most immigrants and their friends and families that during eight years in power, the Republicans did nothing good on immigration. Most people don't remember the anti-immigrant bills approved under the Clinton administration, or that the last amnesty came under a Republican presidency. So right now, while the Republican Party is busy trying to develop a strategy for winning Latino support without alienating its white racist base, the Democrats have a chance to move. The Democratic Party needs to see that if it approves legalization now, it will win the continuing loyalty of a large bloc of existing voters, and at the same time create a large bloc of future voters, spread over rural and urban areas, whose gratitude could boost the party's standing over the next decades.
Will there be a backlash if Congress approves legalization? The 52% of voters who elected Obama mostly don't hate immigrants, so they won't get too riled up about legalization, and many will support it, especially if we work to win over those still unconvinced. Among the other 48% of voters, many probably resent immigrants and oppose legalization, but three years from now, most will have forgotten about it or will have gotten used to it. We will likely see a rise in hate crimes and racist attacks over the next four years, with or without legalization for immigrants, but a focus on dialogue will help to ensure that hateful acts don't gain wide support. And if everyone has legal status, at least immigrants will be able to report threats to police and protest publicly when they are victimized.
There's no time to waste. Any delays in pushing through legalization will hurt its chances. We need to mobilize behind a united demand, and make our voices heard every single day until we get what is needed.
Jane Guskin is co-author of The Politics of Immigration: Questions and Answers, published by Monthly Review Press in July 2007. She lives in New York City, where she is interim co-director of the A.J. Muste Memorial Institute, a grassroots foundation supporting nonviolent action for social justice.
Jane Guskin: Amnesty NOW: How and Why
Most analysts agree that the chances of immigration reform in the first year or two of Obama's administration are extremely slim. We can't expect politicians and policymakers to take action. The change we want to see has to come from below.
We can make it happen if we unite around a common goal: swift, practical, inclusive legalization NOW, as a first step, and eliminate the backlog for people whose immigration cases are in process. Bring people out of the shadows, resolve their status, reunite their families. (And don't worry about what to call it -- amnesty, legalization, regularization, path to citizenship, etc. We know what we're talking about, and we're not fooling our opponents by coming up with new names for it.)
A simple bill we could get behind might look something like this:
1) Change the "registry date" in the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), currently set at January 1, 1972, to January 1, 2006. That will allow anyone here since that date to apply for residency through the relatively straightforward registry process.
2) Restore Section 245(i) of the INA, which lets people who entered the U.S. without permission adjust their immigration status here without having to first return home and face the punitive 10-year bar. Section 245(i) has been lapsed since 2000, leaving millions of people without options to legalize.
3) Get rid of the national origin quotas on family-based petitions and expand the total number of family-based visas available, so people don't have to wait 20 years to reunite with their relatives.
4) Pass the Child Citizen Protection Act, which restores the power of judges to weigh the impact on children when considering the deportation of a parent.
Those four steps will provide options for a huge number of people, including those who would benefit from measures like the DREAM Act (undocumented youth) or AgJobs (farmworkers.) If we're strong enough, we can also win the Uniting American Families Act (equal immigration rights for same-sex couples), a repeal of the harsh 1996 laws, an end to employer sanctions and other badly-needed measures.
We can win these changes now if we:
- Mobilize, organize, march, petition. We need mobilizations twice as big as the ones we saw between Valentine's Day and May Day in 2006, in the months after the House passed anti-immigrant bill HR4437. Those mobilizations changed the whole climate in Washington, leading the Senate to approve a package that included AgJobs and the Dream Act. Unfortunately, the mobilizations didn't continue past May 1, 2006, and the measures approved by the Senate never made it through the House.
- Don't wait. The sooner we act, the sooner we'll see results. By the time Obama's administration passes the 100-day mark on May 1, millions of people should be marching in the streets and calling or visiting their members of Congress.
- Dialogue. Slogans and soundbites won't convince people who aren't already on our side. We need to get people talking to each other about immigration, sharing thoughts and experiences, working through fears and doubts and taking a deeper look at the root causes.
Let's not forget that Congress, not the president, has power over immigration. We don't need to convince Obama, we just need to make sure that the Democrats in Congress understand that they will benefit from swiftly passing a measure to legalize the undocumented -- and they will pay a price if they don't. Latino voters were key in this latest election, and even though many Latinos are not immigrants and many immigrants are not Latino, a large number of US-born Latinos have immigrant relatives, have experienced anti-immigrant racism and are sympathetic to immigrants. Most naturalized immigrant voters are also sympathetic, having struggled through the system themselves.
Inclusive legalization can consolidate the demographic shift of rural America and permanently change the electoral map. Many of the rural areas which overwhelmingly voted for McCain include substantial immigrant populations -- often working in agriculture, meatpacking or other industries -- which have been clamoring for legalization. In Finney County, southwestern Kansas, fewer than 10,000 people voted in this year's presidential election, and McCain beat Obama by 35 percentage points (67%-32%). Yet on April 10, 2006, an estimated 3,000 to 4,000 people rallied for legalization in Garden City, the county seat, out of a total population of around 30,000. McCain won with similar numbers in nearby Ford County, where several thousand people rallied for immigration reform in the county seat, Dodge City, in April 2006. Over in Madison County, Nebraska, with just over 13,500 voters, McCain won 69%-30%; on April 10, 2006, the Tyson Fresh Meats pork plant in the county seat, Madison, had to shut down because so many of its employees walked out to demand legalization. McCain won with 62% of just over 20,000 votes in Hall County, Nebraska, where on May 1, 2006, hundreds marched in the county seat, Grand Island, for immigrant rights.
It's clear in the minds of most immigrants and their friends and families that during eight years in power, the Republicans did nothing good on immigration. Most people don't remember the anti-immigrant bills approved under the Clinton administration, or that the last amnesty came under a Republican presidency. So right now, while the Republican Party is busy trying to develop a strategy for winning Latino support without alienating its white racist base, the Democrats have a chance to move. The Democratic Party needs to see that if it approves legalization now, it will win the continuing loyalty of a large bloc of existing voters, and at the same time create a large bloc of future voters, spread over rural and urban areas, whose gratitude could boost the party's standing over the next decades.
Will there be a backlash if Congress approves legalization? The 52% of voters who elected Obama mostly don't hate immigrants, so they won't get too riled up about legalization, and many will support it, especially if we work to win over those still unconvinced. Among the other 48% of voters, many probably resent immigrants and oppose legalization, but three years from now, most will have forgotten about it or will have gotten used to it. We will likely see a rise in hate crimes and racist attacks over the next four years, with or without legalization for immigrants, but a focus on dialogue will help to ensure that hateful acts don't gain wide support. And if everyone has legal status, at least immigrants will be able to report threats to police and protest publicly when they are victimized.
There's no time to waste. Any delays in pushing through legalization will hurt its chances. We need to mobilize behind a united demand, and make our voices heard every single day until we get what is needed.
Jane Guskin is co-author of The Politics of Immigration: Questions and Answers, published by Monthly Review Press in July 2007. She lives in New York City, where she is interim co-director of the A.J. Muste Memorial Institute, a grassroots foundation supporting nonviolent action for social justice.
- Joined
- Jul 13, 2004
- Messages
- 32,369
- Reaction score
- 2,936
- Points
- 0
- Age
- 52
- Location
- In a van, down by the river...
That's a load of shit. You don't reward criminal activity.
The only thing a Mexican in America deserves is a boot in the ass.
The only thing a Mexican in America deserves is a boot in the ass.
They'll just come back so they can get the other boot and have a pair....
- Joined
- Jul 13, 2004
- Messages
- 32,369
- Reaction score
- 2,936
- Points
- 0
- Age
- 52
- Location
- In a van, down by the river...
Yeah, but how much are they going to like wearing a pair of boots up their ass?
Who the hell told you that? you know how many children born in US have their mom/dad deported? If a Illegal alien has children born on US soil it wont change the parents immigration status .The child might be a US citizen, but the parents can be deported in no time.
Last edited:
a lot of americans don't understand this, they just think kicking all of them out and using force is the best solution. Again thinking with emotion and not with their head.
Cheap labor. I mean I got great mechanic service from mexicans at a low rate all the time back in Florida. I also remember how 10-15 of them will live in a 2 bedroom apartment to save some money, Thats crazy living.
Gears is FULL of IT!! There is NO WORLD CITIZEN. Try telling that to the Chinese if you're a N Korean illegally entering China... they'lle put a bullet in your head...yes, its been done, MAAANNNY TIMES!!! This is what we should do to ANTONE entering our country ILLEGALLY... you'de NEVER catch me entering a country w/o showing my ID & passport!! 'Nough said!!! I live & work with Arabs... no exceptions!!!
GearsMcGilf
Registered
It's such an embarrassment that they come here and can't even see a doc when they get sick. We're the richest country in the world and can't even provide healthcare for hispanic immigrants.
i really hope this is sarcasm
- Joined
- Jul 13, 2004
- Messages
- 32,369
- Reaction score
- 2,936
- Points
- 0
- Age
- 52
- Location
- In a van, down by the river...
GearsMcGilf
Registered
The AZ legislation and the fact that the Ast. Sec State has to apologize to the Chinese for it makes me embarrassed to be an American. It's pretty bad when our human rights record is now on par, probably worse, than the Chinese.
Told me...LMAO I saw it, and saw it many times. None of the illegals were deported and all of them came back for more free medical care.
Of course, but they can be deported at anytime by immigration. Just because the hospital doesn't discriminate against illegals (by calling ICE on them) doesn't mean that their parents become US citizens because their child was born in US soil (if thats what you implied). Similar to schools, Public education is accessible to immigrants in most (if not all ) States, they dont care about your immigration status in the country.
In other words deporting a immigrant at a hospital makes too much noise, it might get all over the news and ICE is going to look like the big bad wolf. They prefer to do it at the immigrants home or streets, also workplace. I've seen them in action, Even had to take care of a little girl because their parents got the boot back to their country of origin. ICE its all about making as little noise as possible.
Funny how they are not deported. I see them come back month after month, even years.
What a shame the only people in America getting free healthcare are illegal Aliens who shit on this great nation every day.
Im not sure what state your on, but basically in Florida if you dont have Social security most hospital wont attend to a immigrant patient who has a minor injury, unless they are willing to pay. The United States of America lures immigrants since the beginning of time by giving them free education and free healthcare as you call it. Most illegals with social security also might get some other benefits like a drivers licence but most pay their taxes. America needed immigrants to get the cheap labor to help built this country, They use to give visas to huge familes like nothing and now its a "problem". I assure you one thing kicking them out wont fix anything, they will only come back illegally again and again. Why give education to a illegal immigrant kids if you dont want them here? I dont get hypocrite ms. Liberty, cut the free education and I assure you most parents will think twice before bringing their kids here illegally.
proffrank
Registered
WOW, mind if I copy & distribute this... It's PRECIOUS!!!!
- Joined
- Jul 13, 2004
- Messages
- 32,369
- Reaction score
- 2,936
- Points
- 0
- Age
- 52
- Location
- In a van, down by the river...
It'll fix the elevated crime and drain on resources.
Not if we actually lockdown the borders and deny them access to everything.
Because the US is a civil first-world country. The problem is that a bunch of third-world people have abused it and it now needs to stop.
If that is your main concern then you should be more focused african americans (since you like targeting a specific type of race or culture) who most leach off your tax money with food stamps, welfare money And flood the majority of your Jails. I never heard of a none working immigrant, the main reason they arrive to your country is to work their asses off and for cheap. The only negative I find in that is that most don't pay taxes.
Lockdown the borders? more and more tunnels are being found near the mexicans borders. Also the amount of cuban immigrants (and Caribbean immigrants) that arrive to the shores of miami is another issue that should be of your concern also? Again if you try to just say fuck all of them and strengthen your borders it wont fix the problem, people will just find new ways to get in US soil. There will be always someone in the USA looking to employee immigrants for the sake of cheap labor therefore attracting immigrants from all third world countries.
I agree immigration its a big issue of concern for everyone, but I think your taking the wrong approach, but only time will tell as we see what happens in Arizona.
- Joined
- Jul 13, 2004
- Messages
- 32,369
- Reaction score
- 2,936
- Points
- 0
- Age
- 52
- Location
- In a van, down by the river...
Because, unlike Mexicans, black Americans are just that, Americans.
The number of Cubans coming to the US is a small fraction of that of Mexicans. Plus, they just can't walk here.
Right now, the US is doing practically nothing to lock down its borders. So you're saying when they do it won't cut back the torrent? If so, you're in denial.
This is how I'd like it to go down: You move military bases along the border. Give the military the right to police the border--with guns. At some point, some Mexicans are going to be stupid enough to try fight their way through, and end up dead. How much do you think the torrent will cut back when death is a real possibility of trying to sneak into the US?
Wrong approach? What's the right one? Just open the borders? Let anyone who asks get in? Hell no. With a few exceptions, third-world people do not belong in first-world countries.
No need to open boarders or Patrol them. The border is not the problem sir (or at least not the main problem).
Couple of steps towards stopping the urge (for immigrants) of hopping over to US soil.
-Cut the free education and healthcare for immigrants
-Increase the fines on companies that hire illegals
-No Driver licenses for any immigrant,
-Parent whos kids are immigrants and are born in USA soil will not gain automatic US citizenship etc etc.
If people keep hiring immigrants in US soil they will keep coming back, NO MATTER WHAT. Anyways good luck with finding enough americans to work at construction sites and mechanic shops, be thankful for cheap labor at least? who will cut your grass for almost nothing? All I hear from you is negativity towards the immigration subject (while you do make some valid points) while never pointing out the positive.
- Joined
- Jul 13, 2004
- Messages
- 32,369
- Reaction score
- 2,936
- Points
- 0
- Age
- 52
- Location
- In a van, down by the river...
You have my vote!
Cheap labor isn't worth it at the expense of the standard of living. Cheap labor means little. There's something called the "invisible hand." It's a principle of a capitalist society. It'll take care of the problem.
Also, Mexicans only make up a small percentage of unskilled laborers. Losing them won't have that big of an effect.
"Third world people" have better family structure, Morals and religion beliefs than most of the population in the united states (no offense, just the way I've seen it by traveling around the Caribbean and south america). Not only that your crime rate is over the roof. I think you have bigger problems to asses in the United States then putting all your energy towards the immigration issue. I love the United States but living in your country is overrated in my opinion of course, I prefer a quiet time in the venezuelan or colombian beaches with beautiful women all around making money of your country via the interwebs. Screw all that USA drama, time to visit more countries and different cultures my friend.
- Joined
- Jul 13, 2004
- Messages
- 32,369
- Reaction score
- 2,936
- Points
- 0
- Age
- 52
- Location
- In a van, down by the river...
Wait...did you just say that the US crime rate is "over the roof" and then talk about how nice it is Venesuala and Columbia?
Holy. Fucking. Shit.
Both of those countries have a level of government corruption that makes what goes on in the US look like nothing. Not to mention the death and destruction caused by the drug cartels. Columbia overtook South Africa as the murder capital of the world.
Really man, think before you type.
Similar threads
