Yes, so long as we judge someone informed enough to consent to a sexual act, I see no reason why we should forbid the sale of it. I do think we should regulate it for public safety to some degree like requiring certification and disease testing to give customers safety options.
Another issue is that since men can't abort accidental pregnancies, females should be obligated to support any children they give birth to unless a male voluntarily takes on that responsibility. Rapists should pay all medical fees associated with abortion (then go directly to jail).
Not really. Again, anyone who argues that prostitution is a victimless crime is clearly not seeing reality. As a rule, normal, healthy, well-adjusted individuals do not choose to become prostitutes. I've never understood why anyone would want to have sex with someone for money. Sounds about as much fun to me as moving furniture.
I've often thought about doing it, if I could make a better hourly wage with less taxing and stressful labour. It's just not an option due to it being illegal (plus I'm probably not hot enough to compete).
This statement involves declarations and minimizations of others' character which seems unjustified. If someone wanted to do this work, you're condemning them as abnormal, unhealthy, maladjusted and unfun.
Furthermore, moving furniture is legal, and some people may actually enjoy that line of work.
The National Center for Missing and Exploited Children (NCMEC), in the 1992
Female Juvenile Prostitution: Problem and Response stated:
"MYTH 2 - Prostitution is a victimless crime.
Prostitution creates a setting whereby crimes against men, women, and children become a commercial enterprise.... It is an assault when he/she forces a prostitute to engage in sadomasochistic sex scenes. When a pimp compels a prostitute to submit to sexual demands as a condition of employment, it is exploitation, sexual harassment, or rape -- acts that are based on the prostitute’s compliance rather than her consent. The fact that a pimp or customer gives money to a prostitute for submitting to these acts does not alter the fact that child sexual abuse, rape, and/or battery occurs; it merely redefines these crimes as prostitution."
1992 -
National Center for Missing and Exploited Children (NCMEC)
This is slavery masked as prostitution, so what is being protested actually is not prostitution. Protesting it on this grounds would be like protesting working at McDonalds if a crazy manager kidnapped me and chained me to a grill in the back and threatened to whip me if I didn't flip patties and then paid me a paltry sum. That's not the type of employment legitimate prostitution, actual consensual sex work, is supposed to be. Like any kind of employment we should find ways to prevent this kind of exploitation.
Obviously people judged as minors inadequately informed to make sexual choices would not be able to work in that field, any more than we would give a driver's license to one. I wouldn't bar driving for adults if a minor illegally drove and hurt themselves in a car crash...
The Pontifical Council for the Pastoral Care of the Migrants and Itinerant People, in the June 20-21, 2006 "First International Meeting of Pastoral Care for the Liberation of Women of the Street," wrote:
"Who is the victim?
She is a human being, in many cases crying for help because selling her body on the street is not what she would choose to do voluntarily. She is torn apart, she is dead psychologically and spiritually. Each person has a different story, mainly one of violence, abuse, mistrust, low self esteem, fear, lack of opportunities. Each has experienced deep wounds that need to be healed."
June 20-21, 2006 -
Pontifical Council for the Pastoral Care of Migrants and Itinerant People
Pastoral care sounds religious in nature. "Spiritually dead" as well. Clearly this is a biased review. It also serves to create the very problem it reports. If you repeat to someone enough that they are "dead inside" they may eventually feel that way. These people are not dead, regardless of whether people tell them they are. Many may experience wounds, psychological stress, but that doesn't mean everyone in the occupation does, at least not moreso than every human experiences these things to some degree in occupations of varying difficulty or life in general.
Joseph Parker, Clinical Director of the Lola Greene Baldwin Foundation, wrote the Aug. 4, 1998 "How Prostitution Works," which stated:
"People who have had luckier lives, as well as those who profit from the sex industry in some way, frequently refer to prostitution and pornography as 'victim-less crimes'. They point to a tiny fraction of sex workers who actually might be involved by choice. They selectively read history to find some tiny minority, somewhere, at some time, who gained something in the sex business.
The very selectiveness of their attention indicates that, on some level, they know that for almost everyone, involvement in the sex industry is a terrible misfortune.
As many an old cop will say, 'Anyone who thinks prostitution is a victimless crime, hasn’t seen it up close.'"
Aug. 4, 1998 -
Joseph Parker
It's not a minority that gains something from prostitution: every prostitute gains something from it. That something is money. Those who do not are not prostitutes, they are sex slaves and that's not something being promoted.
All prostitutes are involved by choice. That's because if you do not choose it, it is not prostitution, it is rape. Rape and slavery are not prostitution. I don't believe anyone infers that this is a dream occupation. Most people would rather not work at all. Most concede to work in something to pay the bills and survive, and they often choose some occupations over others they are unable to do.
Andrew Arena, JD, Special Agent in Charge of Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) in Detroit, was quoted in the Aug. 16, 2006 FBI press release "Halting Human Trafficking: 31 Arrests in Major Prostitution Ring" as having said:
"Illegal prostitution is not a victimless crime. The FBI is part of the apparatus in place to protect people, sometimes even from their own poor choices."
Aug. 16, 2006 -
Andrew Arena, JD
"Protecting from poor choices" is a rather slippery slope to oppressing free will. In fact, interceding on someone's right to choose is exactly that, oppression. I can see some merit in a degree of that (like intervening with heroin addicts whose mental competence is compromised) but if done to excess it becomes especially worrisome since we risk intervening on the choices of informed, sane, clear-minded individuals to make choices in what they do.
No. It should stay illegal and the laws should be inforced. Anyone who states that prostitution is a victimless crime just doesn't have a clue.
This seems to imply that sex is something inherently victimizing?
Veronica Monet, prostitute and author, in a Mar. 26, 2006 interview on the Suicide Girls website, said:
"Most of the brothels do not care about the women who work for them. They care about the clients who are paying them. I don't like legalized brothels. I have nothing against the women that are working in this system but the women who work in legal strip clubs and legal brothels do not benefit from any kind of labor rights."
Mar. 26, 2006
Anastasia Volkonsky, JD, Founder and former Project Director of Prevention, Referral, Outreach, Mentoring, and Intervention to End Sexual Exploitation (PROMISE), in the Feb. 27, 1995
Insight on the News article "Legalization the 'Profession' Would Sanction the Abuse," wrote:
"Behind the facade of a regulated industry, brothel prostitutes in Nevada are captive in conditions analogous to slavery. Women often are procured for the brothels from other areas by pimps who dump them at the house in order to collect the referral fee. Women report working in shifts commonly as long as 12 hours, even when ill, menstruating or pregnant, with no right to refuse a customer who has requested them or to refuse the sexual act for which he has paid. The dozen or so prostitutes I interviewed said they are expected to pay the brothel room and board and a percentage of their earnings -- sometimes up to 50 percent. They also must pay for mandatory extras such as medical exams, assigned clothing and fines incurred for breaking house rules. And, contrary to the common claim that the brothel will protect women from the dangerous, crazy clients on the streets, rapes and assaults by customers are covered up by the management."
Feb. 27, 1995
Sounds like a great system to me.
These are obviously bad systems, but that's a problem with how they are regulated, not a problem with prostitution as an occupation. Problems like this have existed in many fields of work in the past. They improve as people recognize problems, governments regulate them better, workers unionize, etc.
The key word here Prince is consent. Prostitution does not include consent.
Prostitution must include consent, where in the etymological study of the word do you get the impression it includes, much less focuses on, involuntary sex? There's a huge difference between prostitution, the renting of sex slaves, or rape compensation.
Just because someone is paid does not take away the fact that they are often being violated, both physically and emotionally.
What about the engage of money for permission to have sex turns it into an emotional and physical violation?
NO ONE has the right to force someone into sex for money.
You can't force someone to do something with money, you force someone to do something with fear or force. Convincing someone to do something for money is called payment, salary. If someone pays me to carry their groceries, I'm not being forced to carry them, I'm choosing to do it for compensation.
This is not about freedom of choice. It is about basic human respect.
Is it impossible to respect a sex worker? I should think that you think highly enough of their skills to compensate them shows a higher respect for it.
I find prostitution disgusting and immoral, and a violation of basic human decency and dignity.
So, is a prostitute who is happy and willing to do such work indecent and lacking dignity?
Society has an obligation to protect its most vulnerable members.
This depends on the source of perceived obligation. I think protecting vulnerable members is a great idea, makes me feel bubbly inside and all that, but that's more of a moral choice. Obligation sounds involuntary, like how we're obligated to do stuff we'd rather not, and protecting others is a joy for many.
Many get into this due to poverty, and outlawing prostitution does not fix the problem of poverty. If you fix that by providing opportunities to become educated, to find other fields of work, then you give prostitutes options to work in other fields if they desire to. This would actually fix the issue of helping those who do not want to work in the field while also not interfering with the free choice of those that still wish to.
Prostitutes have often gone through a long history of sexual molestation and rape before progressing to the point of becoming prostitutes.
This is true. Molestation and rape are bad and we should combat that. Prostitution is not molestation or rape.
Little girls don't dream of growing up and fucking people for money. These are wounded and damaged people, often hopelessly addicted and without viable choices in their lives. Anyone capable of making an informed decision about their own lives would not get involved in the degrading and dehumanizing act of selling their bodies for money.
Since when are you a mind reader? Obviously aspiring to a lot of occupations is not in the dreams of a lot of people early on. We often acquire new dreams and occupational aspirations as we learn more about the world and the world's options. Clearly since children are not told about sex they can't possibly dream to have it, but the same can be said about other unknown things, like being a repo man or a prison guard.
I think it is stereotyping to infer that all of these people are wounded/damaged/addicted/uninformed makes you guilty of the very degradation you're saying is the problem here. With so many people making such sweeping statements insulting prostitutes, it contributes to the problem of their low self esteem.
what so many people don't realize is that it supports a HUGE human trafficking industry. Its bad enough that human trafficking is pretty much active anywhere in the world, but it has gotten so bad in Amsterdam that they are actually trying to limit and even close down window shops.
Sure, women are handed bundles of money for their services, but look beyond that. Most of the time there is a pimp in the background forcing her and coercing with a drug habit he started her on.
I think legalizing prostitution would only make a bad human trafficking issue even worse, therefore I wouldn't support it.
If the drugs are illegal and human slavery and coercion are illegal ( I believe all 3 of these are) then these are the problems, not prostitution.
These issues exist when it is outlawed. If it is legal, it allows prostitutes to more easily seek help from police, to unionize, to protect themselves and their own rights.
When we force these workers outside of the system, that is what makes them vulnerable to the abuse of pimps. Please explain how legalizing it would make the problem worse.
I just have one question. When has declaring anything illegal stoped it from happening?
It doesn't stop things absolutely, but it does tend to decrease things from happening due to the punishment deterrent. I do think prostitution being illegal decreases the amount of prostitution, but that's besides the point here. The ultimate problem is people having sex for unfair compensation with their fees being taken by pimps, with slavery and drug abuse. These are problems that could be better dealt with by having the occupation legal and regulated and protecting worker rights, preventing exploitation and giving access to counseling, cohabitation, and getting rid of the criminal and exploitive element currently dominating it since it exists outside of the system.
Corporations would be a big step in helping combat this. For example, with the distribution of marijuana, if it were legalized, a bunch of competition would spring up, and the criminal element might try to violently suppress competition. But with corporation, honest legal workers could help hire security against violent and oppressive terrorists trying to keep their monopoly.
All women are really prostitutes anyway. Some will give it up for $50, and others it takes a lot more. But, at the end of the day, they're all selling it.
I disagree, some women may like sex and intimacy and pursue it on equal terms without wanting other rewards.
I back up my arguments with the arguments of dozens of others
This doesn't help if these others' arguments are flawed and unsupported in and of themselves.
legalization does not work, and it only serves to make things worse. Organization and regulation only serves to make the problem more widespread, and make human trafficking and indentured servitude more likely.
Why wouldn't regulations help people suffering from indentured servitude? Legal working and proper taxation and records of income seems like they could help to deal with these problems.
We have laws in this country against rape and assault for a reason. Changing the name to prostitution does not change the reality of the situation.
Rape/assault called prostitution is not prostitution. Protesting this as a reason to outlaw actual prostitution is not valid.
That's like saying we should outlaw all sex because sometimes people rape women and say they consented. Or outlaw boxing because sometimes people have street fights and claim the other guy agreed to fight them.
legalization of prostitution does nothing to solve the variety of inherent problems that come with prostitution, legal or not.
What is an inherent problem with prostitution? Keep in mind, inherent means indivisible, as in ALL cases of prostitution comes with this problem. As in, if I chose to prostitute myself to you, I would be unable to avoid this problem.
fighting prostitution is about as worthwhile as the war on drugs, complete waste of time, money and resources, period.
I don't think it's right to say the war on drugs is a COMPLETE waste (though perhaps relatively) of these things. Drug abuse is a social problem that can contribute to mentally unstable individuals at risk to themselves or others, it makes sense to put some effort towards protecting society from it.