• Hello, this board in now turned off and no new posting.
    Please REGISTER at Anabolic Steroid Forums, and become a member of our NEW community!
  • Check Out IronMag Labs® KSM-66 Max - Recovery and Anabolic Growth Complex

Why one teacher decided to quit

Curt James

Elite Member
Elite Member
Joined
Dec 17, 2009
Messages
14,747
Reaction score
4,238
Points
0
Location
Carlisle, Pennsylvania, USA
Why one good teacher decided to quit

By Jamie Gumbrecht, CNN
UPDATED: 09:12 AM EDT 07.21.11

This is Linda DeRegnaucourt's last summer off. When school starts in August, it will be her last year to think about high school classes, advanced placement tests and calculus.

If all goes as planned, this will be her last year teaching at Palm Bay High School in Brevard County, Florida.

She doesn't want to go. After 13 years of teaching high-level math, she has a tested stable of learning methods that helped all her students pass the AP calculus exam. Her room is a popular place for students to escape the drama of the high school cafeteria.

Few jobs can indulge her excitement for linear functions and matrix calculus.

"I hate to have to leave it," DeRegnaucourt said. "I really thought I was going to be that teacher, 65 years old and retiring from the education field. That's not going to happen."

She's quitting, she said, because she can't afford to stay.

Two years ago, a divorce left 47-year-old DeRegnaucourt with a single income. Rental properties she owned only caused more financial strain as Florida's real estate market fell apart in recent years.

Despite her years of experience, she earns $38,000, she said, less than she made in the past, when teachers received larger supplements for additional certifications.

Once she made a budget, she realized she didn't make enough money to cover her expenses and save for her future.

Changing careers felt like the only wise financial move, she said.

DeRegnaucourt isn't the only one.

Attracting the best students to teaching -- and keeping them -- is tough for schools across the country. Average starting teaching salaries are $39,000, and rise with experience to an average of $54,000, according to "Closing the Talent Gap," a 2010 report by McKinsey & Company.

Teacher salaries can't compete with other careers, the report said, and annual teacher turnover in the United States is 14%.

At "high-needs" high schools, it is 20%.

The Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development data from 2007 said the United States ranks 20th out of 29 for starting teacher salaries, and 23rd out of 29 for teacher salaries after 15 years.

But it's not just the pay, DeRegnaucourt said, "It's the way we're treated."

Her colleagues have waited until just before school starts to learn what courses they'll be teaching, she said. Uncertainty makes it impossible to prepare, hard to succeed.

"Five years ago, 10 years ago, kids would ask me, should they become teachers? I was like, 'Oh, God, yes, I love what I do,' " she said. "Now, I tell my kids, 'You're really, really bright. Why don't you think about going into (this or that?)' They have the potential to be doctors, lawyers, nurses, CEOs and scientists. Why would I recommend to my kids, who I absolutely love, to struggle for years?"

This year, she's finishing the prerequisite courses needed to enroll in nursing school.

DeRegnaucourt hopes to spend a couple of more years learning, then work in emergency care nursing to gain experience.

"It's challenging," she said, "but there's not a whole lot that's more challenging than doing upper level mathematics."

Here's what DeRegnaucourt had to say about her decision to leave teaching.

CNN: Why did you go into teaching?

DeRegnaucourt: When my son was 6 years old, the school system that he was in in Georgia, it did not allow the teacher to take her planning days unless she could find a volunteer sub.

She had to ask for parental volunteers. I told her at the beginning of the year, 'I work at night. I'll take every single one of your days. I can substitute for you.'

I really enjoyed working with the kids. Then I read an article in the paper, and it said that (most) boys get the same educations as their mothers.

I had not gone to college. I wanted my son to be college educated. It was time for me to go back to school.

I knew that math was an area where I would never, ever worry about getting a job as a teacher. If you're in math or physics or chemistry, you can write your own ticket.

CNN: Had you always been interested in math?

DeRegnaucourt: I was not a good student in high school. I really needed a teacher to take me under their wing and go "Look, you have potential."

I didn't have that teacher. I missed a lot of school. You can't be good at math unless you are present to learn it.

When I went back to school, my first math class was pre-pre-college math ... you didn't even get a grade for it, you just got pass or fail.

I remember starting in negative numbers; I never even knew negative numbers existed, except in my checking account.

Whatever I did learn in high school, I had forgotten. I was 29 years old. I had been out of school for 11 years.

I had a teacher for developmental math named Ms. Sifton, and she was amazing. Out of my entire career, she was the best math professor I ever had. I loved math.

CNN: Did that influence how you teach?

DeRegnaucourt: I didn't take Ms. Sifton for granted. The way she made it so elemental, and gave me that strong base to go ahead and succeed. What I have found is most people aren't awful at math, even if math is not your strength. You can be successful, given the right mentor. It definitely influenced the way I teach.

I have always had a very open relationship with my students. I don't believe I deserve respect because I'm older. I deserve it because I've earned it, and you deserve it because you've earned it.

The majority of the really, really amazing techniques I have came from students. I worked summers for years.

I taught a six-week class where students could either remediate or jump ahead. You taught it for an eight-hour day.

I had a young man, Victor Rodriguez. He came up to me, "Ms. D, we're just learning and learning and learning. We're just forgetting and forgetting and forgetting. We need to practice it."

I asked "What do you think we should do?" He said, "I think we need to go to the boards." Every day, except on test days, my kids go to the board (to work math problems in front of each other). If they finish and they get it right, I give them a thumbs up and they go help another student.

The best teaching technique I have -- it came from Victor Rodriguez.

CNN: Why did you decide to leave teaching?

DeRegnaucourt: I have had to learn how to budget. In those thoughts, I came to the realization that the money I make isn't enough. It isn't enough to live alone. That realization was daunting. As educators, we make what we make, nothing more, nothing less.

In industry, if I'm valuable, my company can keep me by making the package they offer me more attractive. In education, the principal's hands are tied. You just never know what the future holds.

I still need to plan for the future.

CNN: Why did you choose nursing?

DeRegnaucourt: I'm happiest when I feel like I'm making a difference in another individual's life.

There are other things I could do. I could take actuarial exams. I could easily pass those; it's math. Do I want to be an actuary, doing risk assessment for an insurance company with no human contact? No, thank you.

What's really amazing is that nurses, with a two-year degree, make $20,000 more than I do.

CNN: How did your students react when they learned this would be your last year teaching?

DeRegnaucourt: My students were the first ones to know. One student comes to mind: Just the other day, he e-mailed and asked me to call him. He wanted to confirm again I would be there next year.

The ones who were leaving, they don't care. I've already done for them what I needed to do.

My juniors moving up to calculus, they were distraught. They know I know what I'm doing. They know what it's like to have a teacher who doesn't know what they're doing. They've all had bad teachers. We all have.

CNN: What do you hope your students take away from their time in your classes?

DeRegnaucourt: Kids come into my classroom, and everyone thinks they're all math geeks. They're not. I have so many kids who take my class because they want the calculus credit for college, but they're not the kind of kid who could go to a college calculus class and meet with success.

I want them to get a love not of mathematics, just knowledge, just learning. I want them to always remember how anything was possible.

From CNN.com

###

I don't like this woman. She's welcome to move on, but wouldn't another option be to sell her rental properties? Even if she just broke even on the properties, wouldn't she be able to make a budget work?

Plus she'll still have the same financial issues as a nursing or health care student.

Or did I miss that part in the article?

Also, the bolded bit at the end of the article. Was that a direct quote from DeRegnaucourt or something injected by the author? Because I recognize a contradiction.

This "good" teacher states, "everyone thinks they're all math geeks. They're not. I have so many kids who take my class because they want the calculus credit for college, but they're not the kind of kid who could go to a college calculus class and meet with success."

But follows that negative (or realistic) statement with: "I want them to always remember how anything was possible."

But anything's not possible, right, DeRegnaucourt?

Finally, why change careers if she loves teaching? Different school districts pay different salaries. Different states pay different salaries.

Take a hit on the rental units and move to a city or area where the pay is higher.

It's really not rocket science.
 
Last edited:
Wow. 38,000? I made more than that my first year in Education. I don't blame her for leaving one bit. The best teachers are getting out. I love teaching but I'm leaving because I can not handle the nonsense that goes with the job. Carlin was right; this country does not want educated citizens. The government is perfectly happy with ignorance. Stupid is much easier to control. People who think for themselves just make trouble for the powers that be.
 
^^^^ True enough, but she accepted the position at X dollars per year.

And other teaching positions are available at a higher salary.

Made 33k my first year. I'm approaching my ninth year. As a single male, no dependents, a big chunk of my salary goes back into the classroom -- art supplies are quickly used up!
 
I don't even mind buying books for my classroom, it's the micromanagement by administrators and politicians who have no idea what it takes to teach kids how to read and write well. After a decade of fighting the same battles year after year, I just do not see things ever changing in any real, long-term way. We get the educational system we deserve in this country, and the system we have prevents more educational opportunities than it presents. Tragic.
 
The Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development data from 2007 said the United States ranks 20th out of 29 for starting teacher salaries, and 23rd out of 29 for teacher salaries after 15 years.

But it's not just the pay, DeRegnaucourt said, "It's the way we're treated."

Education in the US has never really been valued highly.

And after high school, education is a business, which has lead to the bad conditions we have.

And her salary for her quals and field - when math and science instructors are needed is honestly terrible.
 
Wow. 38,000? I made more than that my first year in Education. I don't blame her for leaving one bit. The best teachers are getting out. I love teaching but I'm leaving because I can not handle the nonsense that goes with the job. Carlin was right; this country does not want educated citizens. The government is perfectly happy with ignorance. Stupid is much easier to control. People who think for themselves just make trouble for the powers that be.

the starting pay for teachers just broke $30K like 2-3 years ago. it was at $29,900 for like decades. but overall wages are lower than average in Nevada because the casino's run the show in this state. my last 3 ex-gf's all worked for the school district and you pretty much have to have your masters + 16 to make a decent income in that sector here. that last one was a middle school counselor and she makes about $70K and I think has been with the school district a good 10 years.
 
the starting pay for teachers just broke $30K like 2-3 years ago. it was at $29,900 for like decades. but overall wages are lower than average in Nevada because the casino's run the show in this state. my last 3 ex-gf's all worked for the school district and you pretty much have to have your masters + 16 to make a decent income in that sector here. that last one was a middle school counselor and she makes about $70K and I think has been with the school district a good 10 years.

I does matter a great deal on your education level and where you teach. I made around 75 my last year, with 10 years of experience and a Masters+. My frustration is that unless I am doing what I know to be right in the classroom, I feel like I'm being deceitful to the students. I'm actually going back to school in a few weeks to become a therapist, where I'll have the option to work for myself as soon as I jump through all the state and national educational and certification requirements.
 
Last edited:
(snip) And her salary for her quals and field - when math and science instructors are needed is honestly terrible.

Guess I just get sick of hearing people complain about salary when often they could be grateful instead. She could stay in education and get paid more simply by moving to another area. Perhaps she's already investigated that option and chose health care instead.

MDR, I'm not knocking your choices whatsoever. But this woman just rubs me the wrong way for some reason. :geewhiz:

I come from the world of retail where 20k is more likely than 100k. I also worked several factory jobs, all three shifts, weekends, overtime, loud conditions, dusty crappy work and at the most made 30k for those efforts.

Teaching has been a true Godsend in that regard with its 33k to start on an abbreviated year of work, all first shift, "overtime" as scheduled by your own choice, days off typical at the sight of a single snowflake, no weekends unless you choose to go in to get caught up, reimbursement for college classes and, most importantly, the true delight at working with children who—for the most part—looooove the subject I teach.

loooove-coloring.jpg
 
Last edited:
I come from the world of retail where 20k is more likely than 100k. I also worked several factory jobs, all three shifts, weekends, overtime, loud conditions, dusty crappy work and at the most made 30k for those efforts.

retail is the 2nd hardest hit sector next to fast food in terms of low wages in the service sector. since 1985 the median hourly wage has increased from $4.15 to $9 for sales persons in retail for supervisors you can double that $9 to $18. considering that manufacturing has been outsourced to save on those costs the industry could and should pay substantially more.

it's bullshit to say the least....
 
my feelings on teachers went completely downhill over the last several months....my perspective is directly a result of what's been happening here in madison......the more they protest, the less support they're getting......
 
Muscle Gelz Transdermals
IronMag Labs Prohormones
Guess I just get sick of hearing people complain about salary when often they could be grateful instead. She could stay in education and get paid more simply by moving to another area. Perhaps she's already investigated that option and chose health care instead.

MDR, I'm not knocking your choices whatsoever. But this woman just rubs me the wrong way for some reason. :geewhiz:

I come from the world of retail where 20k is more likely than 100k. I also worked several factory jobs, all three shifts, weekends, overtime, loud conditions, dusty crappy work and at the most made 30k for those efforts.

Teaching has been a true Godsend in that regard with its 33k to start on an abbreviated year of work, all first shift, "overtime" as scheduled by your own choice, days off typical at the sight of a single snowflake, no weekends unless you choose to go in to get caught up, reimbursement for college classes and, most importantly, the true delight at working with children who -- for the most part -- looooove the subject I teach.

loooove-coloring.jpg

I can relate to the issue of pay. I pulled green chain at a lumber mill in the summers during college, usually working double shifts for as many weeks as I could by volunteering to work cleanup crew after my scheduled shift. Anyone who has ever worked heavy labor 16 hours a day can relate. The work was backbreaking, and the work situation was at times very dangerous, but it paid my expenses during the school year.

There are a lot of benefits to life as an educator, but the main benefit for me was to know I was making some kind of a difference in the lives of the young people I worked with. When I started I was able to write my own curriculum and even pick my own books in some cases. Two years ago an administrator decided that All British literature (including Shakespeare) was to be removed for all lit classes, and that they would be replaced by short magazine artice style reading assignments. I was only allowed to use "classic literature" in my AP English classes. I don't understand how a district administrator with no teaching experience and no knowledge of the curriculum in place, much less the inherent value of studying great literature can possibly make such a decision, but there you have it. Some of the greatest literary works of art wiped off the slate in one fell swoop. Makes me sick just thinking about it. Education is going downhill, and I think that the majority of the country could not care less. The system is broken, and it will never be fixed.
 
Two years ago an administrator decided that All British literature (including Shakespeare) was to be removed for all lit classes, and that they would be replaced by short magazine artice style reading assignments. I was only allowed to use "classic literature" in my AP English classes. I don't understand how a district administrator with no teaching experience and no knowledge of the curriculum in place, much less the inherent value of studying great literature can possibly make such a decision, but there you have it. Some of the greatest literary works of art wiped off the slate in one fell swoop. Makes me sick just thinking about it. Education is going downhill, and I think that the majority of the country could not care less. The system is broken, and it will never be fixed.

the future of the US....a nation of stupid, fat, poor people.....
 
the future of the US....a nation of stupid, fat, poor people.....

I see it, also.

I see it the same way MDR does also. What that bureaucrat was a shame. Literally dumbing down the video game generation more.
 
so has anyone seen idiocracy? funny but probably a prophetic movie.
 
Has anyone seen 'Waiting for Superman'? It's a great documentary about public education in the U.S., about what hasn't worked and what is working.
 
I'm sure there are teachers that are passionate about there job, but most do it for the time off. People constantly complain about there salary, yet the chose the profession and knew the range of pay.
 
waiting for superman has some fallacies one of them that is glaringly omitted is the reality that outstanding public schools and their exemplary teachers and principals actually do exist in abundance, yet none are featured.One of our public schools here churns out more MIT /Harvard/ acceptances than some of the elite private schools. And the contrary, that not all charter schools are as successful as the exclusive ones presented in the film. Not all kids are highly motivated, nor are all parents supportive of them or proactive in their parenting skills like the five kids followed. The mistake is that this film also demonizes teachers. All other countries that I was educated at , teachers were on par with doctors and scientists. This is what needs to be changed. DOnt demonize them. Also, what this movie does not tell you is the teacher's salaries in their asian counterparts are not tied to performance of students. Study after study shows this does not work anymore than tieing pay for doctors for churning out "high performing" patients. Too many demographic factors affect a patient's health compliance outside of an outstanding physician. Give a teacher the pay they deserve but make them earn it. RIght now my degree in chemistry, research, and best teaching award for teaching medical students etc. can't get me a job teaching AP chemistry to high school students in public schools , I still need a "teaching" degree. ( I do guest lectures for AP classes at private schools though). If a person has a masters in math and can teach give the woman or man 60 grand for teaching , otherwise, he can be an actuarialist for 80,000 grand. This is what they do in the pacific rim, where i'm from. My AP physics teacher in high school in long island made at least 65 grand over 25 years ago. ( but he did help design the voyager antenna). We had a near perfect score rate for AP physics from that school.

I feel for teachers, as someone who teaches the most elite students, I find I have to work hard to engage them, keep their interest etc. in a population that is already self selected for me as outstanding students. I can't imagine teaching calculus to an apethetic class.
 
I'm sure there are teachers that are passionate about there job, but most do it for the time off.

Show us the data.

Show us the data that people spend 5 years in a University to go into Education to get what? 10 weeks off in the Summer? And then 1-2 weeks off during the academic year adding up Xmas and Spring break?

I've never read that before. Please show me.



People constantly complain about there salary, yet the chose the profession and knew the range of pay.[/QUOTE]
 
I'm sure there are teachers that are passionate about there job, but most do it for the time off.

that statement is based purely on your opinion.

about a good 25-30% of my friends are teachers in either primary or secondary, my last 3 gf's and my father taught phys ed for a good 25 years. I've never heard a single teacher every say that in my life. just about everyone I know in education in primary or secondary wanted to do so when they were very little or at the latest before hs.
 
because teachers unions ARE EVIL (understand i'm from wisconsin and support my gov scott walker)

there is nothing evil about teachers unions or any unions. you have apparently consumed many full servings of anti-union neo-liberal bullshit of the decades. your governors attack on teachers unions is all about making them look bad helping to re-enforce bogus standardized testing practices with the long term goal of eliminating the current system and replacing it with a voucher system.

your gov is a lying, sneaky POS, him and the rest of the neo-liberal puppets are trying smash one of the last big groups with power that consistently vote behind the democrats. dirty pool as always by the GOP, instead of focusing on the issues they are trying to break the back of their competition. this and all the redistricting, changes to voting (identification, etc.)
 
waiting for superman has some fallacies one of them that is glaringly omitted is the reality that outstanding public schools and their exemplary teachers and principals actually do exist in abundance, yet none are featured.One of our public schools here churns out more MIT /Harvard/ acceptances than some of the elite private schools. And the contrary, that not all charter schools are as successful as the exclusive ones presented in the film. Not all kids are highly motivated, nor are all parents supportive of them or proactive in their parenting skills like the five kids followed. The mistake is that this film also demonizes teachers. All other countries that I was educated at , teachers were on par with doctors and scientists. This is what needs to be changed. DOnt demonize them. Also, what this movie does not tell you is the teacher's salaries in their asian counterparts are not tied to performance of students. Study after study shows this does not work anymore than tieing pay for doctors for churning out "high performing" patients. Too many demographic factors affect a patient's health compliance outside of an outstanding physician. Give a teacher the pay they deserve but make them earn it. RIght now my degree in chemistry, research, and best teaching award for teaching medical students etc. can't get me a job teaching AP chemistry to high school students in public schools , I still need a "teaching" degree. ( I do guest lectures for AP classes at private schools though). If a person has a masters in math and can teach give the woman or man 60 grand for teaching , otherwise, he can be an actuarialist for 80,000 grand. This is what they do in the pacific rim, where i'm from. My AP physics teacher in high school in long island made at least 65 grand over 25 years ago. ( but he did help design the voyager antenna). We had a near perfect score rate for AP physics from that school.

I feel for teachers, as someone who teaches the most elite students, I find I have to work hard to engage them, keep their interest etc. in a population that is already self selected for me as outstanding students. I can't imagine teaching calculus to an apethetic class.

I could not agree more. I find the idea of linking salary to performance in Education to be laughable. First of all, the method of deciding success or failure surrounds student performance, and even the greatest teacher in the world can not control all the factors involved in student performance. How can you judge an individual on variables they have no influence over? Secondly, the method of deciding who is successful and who is not is fatally flawed. State and federally mandated testing is simply not an accurate measure of success. The tests are poorly written, and the exams themselves fail to measure the level of student ability in any real way. Students are not motivated to perform well on these tests. Teaching to a test is counter-productive to actual learning, and a gigantic waste of time. Fear has created a national obsession with testing that simply does nothing to facilitate any kind of genuine learning experience for the student. The students know this, and they see is for the sad joke that it is.

Teaching a young person to read is a difficult process indeed. We live in a culture where kids are not encouraged to read anything but their computers and cell phones. This is a poor substiture for actual literature. I by no means hold that only canonical literature should be taught in schools, but these works contain a depth often missing in modern literature. You can not compare Shakespeare and Milton to the author of the "Twilight" series. Classic literature often contains a kind of truth and honesty that is found in few places in our society. If students are unable to read well, teaching writing becomes impossible without first addressing the reading issue. Not being able to read well makes success at the college level impossible, in any academic subject.
 
Last edited:
I could not agree more. I find the idea of linking salary to performance in Education to be laughable.

there are far to many variables and factors that effect learning to negate the relatively short amount of time out of the hours of the week that teachers have with their students.

linking salary to performance is pseudo-logic most spouted from the mouths of the anti-government crowd, the neo-liberal sheep.
 
^^^^ True enough, but she accepted the position at X dollars per year.

And other teaching positions are available at a higher salary.

Made 33k my first year. I'm approaching my ninth year. As a single male, no dependents, a big chunk of my salary goes back into the classroom -- art supplies are quickly used up!

Sounds like my buddy when he started out in Kentucky. At least now he is going back and the job pays $54K for high school English; if he gets it he will be thrilled since that is a second income. With how much money is thrown at the education system, the teachers have always got the SHIT end of the stick. There are bad teachers, there are good teachers but just getting through a year is worthy of much more than $33k. Hell my job drives me nuts sometimes but it is far from the stress a teacher faces.
 
With how much money is thrown at the education system, the teachers have always got the SHIT end of the stick. There are bad teachers, there are good teachers but just getting through a year is worthy of much more than $33k. Hell my job drives me nuts sometimes but it is far from the stress a teacher faces.

there is a direct link between the household income and scholastic achievement in OECD countries.
 
^^^^ True enough, but she accepted the position at X dollars per year.

And other teaching positions are available at a higher salary.

Made 33k my first year. I'm approaching my ninth year. As a single male, no dependents, a big chunk of my salary goes back into the classroom -- art supplies are quickly used up!

Curt you sound disgruntled. I'll bet she's really fat and homely.
 
Back
Top