• Hello, this board in now turned off and no new posting.
    Please REGISTER at Anabolic Steroid Forums, and become a member of our NEW community!
  • Check Out IronMag Labs® KSM-66 Max - Recovery and Anabolic Growth Complex

Old dude gets knocked the Fuck out...

Atlanta, Georgia is 61% black. The majority of the police and judges are black. The mayor is black. They have over twice the crime of Los Angeles (a city known for its crime) and the majority of the prison convicts are black.

Yes, prejudices do exist and effect arrest rates, but never mind that blacks make up 12% of the county's population, yet make up 27% of the crime. That huge disparity is most assuredly racism. :rolleyes:


Residents with income below the poverty level in 2009

Atlanta - 22.5%
LA - 19.8%

African Americans in poverty 2009

Atlanta - 33.9%
LA - 24.6%

Whites in poverty 2009

Atlanta - 7.6%
LA - 11.2%

The state of California has 5X the GDP per capita than does Georgia.

The fact that Atlanta has a higher poverty rate leads me to believe it is the primary cause of their higher crime rate. There is much more disparity between the property crime rate than the violent crime rate, also consistent with poor societies. There could be many other factors, such as city budget and active policing. How well are the poor neighborhoods policed in comparison to other neighbourhoods? Crime is committed by a small percentage of any population, so a slight increase in poverty levels can have a significant difference in crime rates.

Bakersfield CA has a crime rate similar to Atlanta and significantly greater than LA. It only has an 8% Black population...how do you explain this???

NY City has almost 3X the African American population as LA, but has 50% less crime...how do you explain this???

Crime Rates for Selected Large Cities, 2005 — Infoplease.com

Crime is greater in poor neighborhoods and it just so happens that poor neighborhoods are more populated by African Americans. To make an assumption that Black people are inherently criminal is not only racist, it's ignorant. The fact that you would allow yourself to believe Black people are more criminal is ignorant. Black people may be more criminal, but only as it relates to their socioeconomic status, not color of their skin. Few white people are poor, therefore they commit less crimes; it doesn't take a brain surgeon to figure this out, but it does require one not being racist.

Socioeconomic status is a predictor of crime, not race; the fact that America has impoverished its black population is just a convenient racist argument.
 
Last edited:
Residents with income below the poverty level in 2009

Atlanta - 22.5%
LA - 19.8%

African Americans in poverty 2009

Atlanta - 33.9%
LA - 24.6%

Whites in poverty 2009

Atlanta - 7.6%
LA - 11.2%

The state of California has 5X the GDP per capita than does Georgia.

The fact that Atlanta has a higher poverty rate leads me to believe it is the primary cause of their higher crime rate. There is much more disparity between the property crime rate than the violent crime rate, also consistent with poor societies. There could be many other factors, such as city budget and active policing. How well are the poor neighborhoods policed in comparison to other neighbourhoods? Crime is committed by a small percentage of any population, so a slight increase in poverty levels can have a significant difference in crime rates.

Bakersfield CA has a crime rate similar to Atlanta and significantly greater than LA. It only has an 8% Black population...how do you explain this???

Crime is greater in poor neighborhoods and it just so happens that poor neighborhoods are more populated by African Americans. To make an assumption that Black people are inherently criminal is not only racist, it's ignorant. The fact that you would allow yourself to believe Black people are more criminal is ignorant. Black people may be more criminal, but only as it relates to their socioeconomic status, not color of their skin. Few white people are poor, therefore they commit less crimes; it doesn't take a brain surgeon to figure this out, but it does require one not being racist.

Socioeconomic status is a predictor of crime, not race; the fact that America has impoverished its black population is just a convenient racist argument.

The problem with your numbers is that, for example, the difference in poverty is 13%, where as violent crime is double that of LA and over double for non-violent. Not exactly a correlation.

As for Bakersfield, I looked up those numbers.

Murders in 2010 (per 1000):
Bakersfield: 9.9
Altanta: 17.3

Rape in 2010 (per 1000):
Bakersfield: 10.2
Altanta: 16.6

Robberies in 2010 (per 1000):
Bakersfield: 192
Altanta: 403

And Bakersfield is only 60% white.

Any more bullshit you'd care to throw out?
 
Last edited:
The problem with your numbers is that, for example, the difference in poverty is 13%, where as violent crime is double that of LA and over double for non-violent. Not exactly a correlation.

As for Bakersfield, I looked up those numbers are very easy to get.

Murders in 2010 (per 1000):
Bakersfield: 9.9
Altanta: 17.3

Rape in 2010 (per 1000):
Bakersfield: 10.2
Altanta: 16.6

Robberies in 2010 (per 1000):
Bakersfield: 192
Altanta: 403

And Bakersfield is still 60% white.

Any more bullshit you'd care to throw out?

You did not open my link to crime indexes per city which are sourced by the FBI, you are using selective crime rates to make your racist point.

So yes, here's some of the same bullshit for you; NYC has nearly 3X the Black population than LA, but 50% less crime. Explain this?

OK, I'll explain it for you. NYC has a significantly lower poverty rate than LA. :clapping:
 
You did not open my link to crime indexes per city which are sourced by the FBI, you are using selective crime rates to make your racist point.

It's city-data.com, but I'm sure they have a racist agenda. :dwnthumb:

So yes, here's some of the same bullshit for you; NYC has nearly 3X the Black population than LA, but 50% less crime. Explain this?

OK, I'll explain it for you. NYC has a significantly lower poverty rate than LA. :clapping:

From your link:

Murders (per 100,000)
Atlanta: 11.2
Bakersfield: 20.9

Rapes (per 100,000)
Atlanta: 51.8
Bakersfield: 15.7

Robbery (per 100,000)
Atlanta: 664
Bakersfield: 185

Burglary (per 100,000)
Atlanta: 1544
Bakersfield: 1311

And finally:

Overall Crime Index (higher is worse)
Atlanta: 8965
Bakersfield: 6348

Yes, you're shoveling bullshit.

Learn to read.
 
OK, I'll explain it for you. NYC has a significantly lower poverty rate than LA. :clapping:

The cost of living is much, much higher in in NY than LA. You can live above the national poverty rate, yet live a below poverty rate in NY.

Learn real-world economics.
 
It's city-data.com, but I'm sure they have a racist agenda. :dwnthumb:



From your link:

Murders (per 100,000)
Atlanta: 11.2
Bakersfield: 20.9

Rapes (per 100,000)
Atlanta: 51.8
Bakersfield: 15.7

Robbery (per 100,000)
Atlanta: 664
Bakersfield: 185

Burglary (per 100,000)
Atlanta: 1544
Bakersfield: 1311

And finally:

Overall Crime Index (higher is worse)
Atlanta: 8965
Bakersfield: 6348

Yes, you're shoveling bullshit.

Learn to read.

Citi-data does not show the total index. Yes your numbers are correct, but they did not originally reflect the overall index. And I said they were similar, not exact; actually when I look at them again, Atlanta does have 40% greater overall crime, but it also has 8X the Black population. Explain please, as you've pointed out, I don't know how to do math.
 
Last edited:
The cost of living is much, much higher in in NY than LA. You can live above the national poverty rate, yet live a below poverty rate in NY.

Learn real-world economics.

So that's your reason why Black people in NYC commit less crimes...

You're such a racist; you said Black people commit more crime than white people. NYC has almost 3X more Blacks than LA, yet it has 46% less crime. How does this work into your theory.

You chose a city (Atlanta) who has 8X more blacks than LA; to determine Blacks commit more crime...you seriously are a mathematician.

BTW, I interpret economics daily to do my job, I also have economics education...anytime you want to have an economics debate, I'm game.

What a dumb ass racist :owned:
 
You're such a racist; you said Black people commit more crime than white people.
Facts make him a racist? You can't be serious. Your liberal propaganda does nothing but promote more violence from the black animals. Start executing their black asses or send them back to Africa one by one and the entire US crime rate will fall drastically. They are nothing more than animals and should be treated accordingly.
 
Facts make him a racist? You can't be serious. Your liberal propaganda does nothing but promote more violence from the black animals. Start executing their black asses or send them back to Africa one by one and the entire US crime rate will fall drastically. They are nothing more than animals and should be treated accordingly.

with your rather rudimentary explanation of crime in America care to explain similar crime patterns in Poland, Hungary, Czech Republic, etc. where there is almost a complete lack of blacks.
 
Facts make him a racist? You can't be serious. Your liberal propaganda does nothing but promote more violence from the black animals. Start executing their black asses or send them back to Africa one by one and the entire US crime rate will fall drastically. They are nothing more than animals and should be treated accordingly.

I'm serious. :fucktard:
 
Muscle Gelz Transdermals
IronMag Labs Prohormones
Citi-data does not show the total index. Yes your numbers are correct, but they did not originally reflect the overall index. And I said they were similar, not exact; actually when I look at them again, Atlanta does have 40% greater overall crime, but it also has 8X the Black population. Explain please, as you've pointed out, I don't know how to do math.

Retarded much?

You linked to a page that you claimed (with its vaunted total index) that Bakersfield had a higher crime rate than Atlanta. I showed that your source said no such thing.

Now you're saying that the higher crime rate is due to higher number of blacks. Which is what I've said, and posted the facts for. :shrug:
 
So that's your reason why Black people in NYC commit less crimes...

NYC is only 26% black. :bulb:

You're such a racist; you said Black people commit more crime than white people. NYC has almost 3X more Blacks than LA, yet it has 46% less crime. How does this work into your theory.

There are also lots of Mexicans in LA.

You chose a city (Atlanta) who has 8X more blacks than LA; to determine Blacks commit more crime...you seriously are a mathematician.

You really are retarded. I already posted the aggregate crime rates for black and Mexicans for the entire country.

BTW, I interpret economics daily to do my job, I also have economics education...anytime you want to have an economics debate, I'm game.
You suck at it. Get a new line of work.

What a dumb ass racist :owned:

Says the moron that can't handle numbers and had shit reading comprehension.
 
Facts make him a racist? You can't be serious. Your liberal propaganda does nothing but promote more violence from the black animals. Start executing their black asses or send them back to Africa one by one and the entire US crime rate will fall drastically. They are nothing more than animals and should be treated accordingly.

Let me show you how racism works:

Not racist:
Stating that blacks tend to have more testosterone than the others races.
Stating that blacks tend to be taller than the other races.
A black man invented peanut butter.
BET is a television network by blacks, for blacks.
The United Negro Scholarship fund is only for blacks.

Racist:
Stating that whites commit less crime than blacks.
Stating that whites tend to score higher on intelligence tests than blacks.
The vast majority of modern discoveries and inventions were by whites.
A television station for whites only.
A scholarship fund for whites only.

See?
 
NYC is only 26% black. :bulb:



There are also lots of Mexicans in LA.



You really are retarded. I already posted the aggregate crime rates for black and Mexicans for the entire country.


You suck at it. Get a new line of work.



Says the moron that can't handle numbers and had shit reading comprehension.

Still looking for the reason NYC has 46% less crime even though it has almost 3X more more Black residents professor. NYC also has a very large Hispanic population; the difference in white population is only 7%

Please let me know professor; I need a reading comprehension lesson, apparently I have a difficult time understanding your selective racist stats.

:fucktard: :shooter:
 
I'm a complete racist. I discriminate against blacks, whites, those squinty eyed fellows, hispanics, pretty much every race on earth, animals, insects, artificial intelligences. My trick is to discriminate evenly against everything.
 
Fun Fact:

Percentage of Population / Percentage of Crime

Blacks: 12/28
Hispanics 16/37

Conclusion:

That means that blacks and Hispanics account for 65% of all crime in the USA.

If you live in an mostly white city, you'll experience a crime rate far below the national average.

I'd like to know if these are actual crime rates or incarceration rates. Provide source.
 
Still looking for the reason NYC has 46% less crime even though it has almost 3X more more Black residents professor. NYC also has a very large Hispanic population; the difference in white population is only 7%

Please let me know professor; I need a reading comprehension lesson, apparently I have a difficult time understanding your selective racist stats.

:fucktard: :shooter:

First off, the emoticons? You have one that supposed to denigrate me, yet you placed one shooting at that emoticon?

Good God, you even fail at emoticons.

There are a few relevant factors in the difference in race and crime in LA and NYC. The prime ones are:

Size
New York: 468.9 sq mi (1,214.4 km2)
Los Angeles: 4,752.32 sq mi (12,308.5 km2)

New York City is a tenth the size of Los Angeles. It's much, much easier to police.

The other is the size of the police force.

Number of police officers
New York: 35,800
Los Angeles: (just under) 13,268

NYC is a tenth the size of Los Angeles, yet has 2.7 times the police officers.

It's called critical thinking and statistics, moron.
 
I'd like to know if these are actual crime rates or incarceration rates. Provide source.

You can't read and now your want me to do your research for you? :tard:

The facts are public figures available from government websites. There's this thing called the Internet. On it, you'll find Google. Use it.
 
First off, the emoticons? You have one that supposed to denegrate me, yet you placed one shooting at that emoticon?

Good God, you even fail at emoticons.

There are a few relevant factors in the difference in race and crime in LA and NYC. The prime one:

Size
New York: 468.9 sq mi (1,214.4 km2)
Los Angeles: 4,752.32 sq mi (12,308.5 km2)

New York City is a tenth the size of Los Angeles. It's much, much easier to police.

The other is the size of the police force.

Number of police officers
New York: 35,800
Los Angeles: (just under) 13,268

NYC is a tenth the size of Los Angeles, yet has 2.7 times the police officers.

It's called critical thinking and statistics, moron.

Really, so then proper policing is more of a factor in crime than race. Perhaps that's the reason Atlanta has a higher crime rate than LA.

Both cities have comparable police per capita 49/10,000 and 52/10,000, your argument is retarded. But nice try
 
Really, so then proper policing is more of a factor in crime than race. Perhaps that's the reason Atlanta has a higher crime rate than LA.

Both cities have comparable police per capita 49/10,000 and 52/10,000, your argument is retarded. But nice try

In terms of area, NYC is one tenth the size of LA, dumb ass. Even if your numbers were true, the size of area that needs policing is vastly smaller, and thus easier, in NYC.

Population:
New York: 8,008,278
Los Angeles: 9,862,049

Number of police officers
New York: 35,800
Los Angeles: 13,268

Number of people per one police officer:
New York: 223
Los Angeles: 743

Each officer in LA is responsible for 3.3 times the number of people that a NYC cop is. Put another way, LA has a third the per capita cops that NYC does.

Keep making shit up. It's really helping your side of the argument and making you look very intelligent. :dwnthumb:
 
In terms of area, NYC is one tenth the size of LA, dumb ass. Even if your numbers were true, the size of area that needs policing is vastly smaller, and thus easier, in NYC.

Population:
New York: 8,008,278
Los Angeles: 9,862,049

Number of police officers
New York: 35,800
Los Angeles: 13,268

Number of people per one police officer:
New York: 223
Los Angeles: 743

Each officer in LA is responsible for 3.3 times the number of people that a NYC cop is. Put another way, LA has a third the per capita cops that NYC does.

Keep making shit up. It's really helping your side of the argument and making you look very intelligent. :dwnthumb:

My stats are correct. LA's population is 3.7 million, if you're going to include neighboring cities, then you should include their police forces as well.

So the only one pulling stats out of their ass is you my racist friend.

BTW, LA is not 10X larger than NYC dipshit, you're fucking up metropolis area and city proper.


NYC - 790 sq km's
LA - 1,213.8 sq km's

So I still need to understand why NYC has less crime; your argument is that the crooks have less distance to run from the police, so they are detered. But you also believe blacks commit more crime than whites. Since NYC has 3X more blacks than LA and Blacks experience 2X the incarceration rate of hispanics, NYC should have about 6X the crime from this demographic alone. How is it that NYC has 46% less crime than LA???

C'mon professor, pull some more stats out of your ass.

Oh and :owned:
 
Last edited:
When they act like it, they can be called it...
Stupid niggers! I hope a cop or somebody who can do something see's this video and keeps it as evidence to put all the fucks involved in jail for assault! I'm pissed now...

Yup, Niggers will be niggers. Now there's a difference between a classy black man, and well black people shown in that video talking and acting like the trash they are.

Hell, if there's a ghetto ass white boy walking around like a thug hes considered a nigger in my books too.
 
My stats are correct. LA's population is 3.7 million, if you're going to include neighboring cities, than you should include their police forces as well.

So the only one pulling stats out of their ass is you my racist friend.

BTW, LA is not 10X larger than NYC dipshit, you're fucking up metropolis area and city proper.


NYC - 790 sq km's
LA - 1,213.8 sq km's

When people talk about LA, they're talking about LA County. I never said Los Angeles city. The LAPD polices all of Los Angeles Country and not just the city. Even if you assume that all LAPD service just LA City, NYC still have 2.7 times the officers that LA City does.

Dropping to the city level doesn't help your case. You really are dumb fuck.

So I still need to understand why NYC has less crime; your argument is that the crooks have less distance to run from the police, so they are detered. But you also believe blacks commit more crime than whites. Since NYC has 3X more blacks than LA and Blacks experience 2X the incarceration rate of hispanics, NYC should have about 6X the crime from this demographic alone. How is it that NYC has 46% less crime than LA???

C'mon professor, pull some more stats out of your ass.

Oh and :owned:

I love the spin that you "everyone is equal bullshit" people use.

I pointed out the national average of crime by race. You didn't like it, so you're trying to ignore it.

You tried comparing Bakersfield to Atlanta. Only to find out that you're completely full of shit and can't read statistics.

You tried to compare LA to NYC. Then you found at that NYC has 2.7 times the police and is a tenth the size of LA. So you tried to shuck and jive about it being LA country and not LA city. Never thinking that it still doesn't help that NYC has 2.7 times more police. That's 2.7, dumb ass. You suck at numbers, so I'll just tell you that is a big difference.

Nothing you can say about NYC, LA, Bakersfield or Atlanta can trump the national average, cocksucker. Black and Mexicans are responsible for 65% of the nations crime, and Whites make up 72.4%. Even if you attribute all of the remaining 35% of crime to just whites, that means that white only commit less than half the per capita that they should.

The only thing you've owned is the money you gave the black man-whore you hired. BTW, you forgot to take his cock out of your mouth. Oh, and there's something on your chin.
 
When people talk about LA, they're talking about LA County. I never said Los Angeles city. The LAPD polices all of Los Angeles Country and not just the city. Even if you assume that all LAPD service just LA City, NYC still have 2.7 times the officers that LA City does.

Dropping to the city level doesn't help your case. You really are dumb fuck.



I love the spin that you "everyone is equal bullshit" people use.

I pointed out the national average of crime by race. You didn't like it, so you're trying to ignore it.

You tried comparing Bakersfield to Atlanta. Only to find out that you're completely full of shit and can't read statistics.

You tried to compare LA to NYC. Then you found at that NYC has 2.7 times the police and is a tenth the size of LA. So you tried to shuck and jive about it being LA country and not LA city. Never thinking that it still doesn't help that NYC has 2.7 times more police. That's 2.7, dumb ass. You suck at numbers, so I'll just tell you that is a big difference.

Nothing you can say about NYC, LA, Bakersfield or Atlanta can trump the national average, cocksucker. Black and Mexicans are responsible for 65% of the nations crime, and Whites make up 72.4%. Even if you attribute all of the remaining 35% of crime to just whites, that means that white only commit less than half the per capita that they should.

The only thing you've owned is the money you gave the black man-whore you hired. BTW, you forgot to take his cock out of your mouth.

Wow, do you have any idea a fucking stupid you are making yourself look? Go to the wiki page of both the LAPD and NYPD. My stats will be there. Go to their respective official websites...the info is there...

Both have a police force that is roughly 50 officers per 10,000 and NYC is about 40% smaller than LA, not 1/10th.

Oh and LA county is policed by the LA county sheriffs department (LASD) you fucking idiot, not the LAPD. It serves 2.8 million people and is the 2nd largest force in the U.S., the LAPD is the 4th Largest.

:clapping::clapping::clapping::clapping: :fucktard:
 
Last edited:
All of your completely useless bullshit aside; I would love to see your white ass(or black or any color) walk down the road in a predominantly black neighborhood day or night. If you make it out alive(because you WILL lose your wallet) come back and defend the animals. Fucking idiot, send your daughter through a black neighborhood or sister or wife. Your facts and defense of their completely uncivilized nature only serves to give them more excuses to behave like animals. Make them accountable.

If you want to help blacks so bad get them jobs and/or force them to get educations.
 
When people talk about LA, they're talking about LA County. I never said Los Angeles city. The LAPD polices all of Los Angeles Country and not just the city. Even if you assume that all LAPD service just LA City, NYC still have 2.7 times the officers that LA City does.

Dropping to the city level doesn't help your case. You really are dumb fuck.



I love the spin that you "everyone is equal bullshit" people use.

I pointed out the national average of crime by race. You didn't like it, so you're trying to ignore it.

You tried comparing Bakersfield to Atlanta. Only to find out that you're completely full of shit and can't read statistics.

You tried to compare LA to NYC. Then you found at that NYC has 2.7 times the police and is a tenth the size of LA. So you tried to shuck and jive about it being LA country and not LA city. Never thinking that it still doesn't help that NYC has 2.7 times more police. That's 2.7, dumb ass. You suck at numbers, so I'll just tell you that is a big difference.

Nothing you can say about NYC, LA, Bakersfield or Atlanta can trump the national average, cocksucker. Black and Mexicans are responsible for 65% of the nations crime, and Whites make up 72.4%. Even if you attribute all of the remaining 35% of crime to just whites, that means that white only commit less than half the per capita that they should.

The only thing you've owned is the money you gave the black man-whore you hired. BTW, you forgot to take his cock out of your mouth. Oh, and there's something on your chin.

That^^^ right there is total ownage:owned::owned::owned:
 
Wow, do you have any idea a fucking stupid you are making yourself look? Go to the wiki page of both the LAPD and NYPD. My stats will be there. Go to their respective official websites...the info is there...

Both have a police force that is roughly 50 officers per 10,000 and NYC is about 40% smaller than LA, not 1/10th.

Oh and LA county is policed by the LA county sheriffs department (LASD) you fucking idiot, not the LAPD. It serves 2.8 million people and is the 2nd largest force in the U.S., the LAPD is the 4th Largest.

:clapping::clapping::clapping::clapping: :fucktard:

Since you're an Internet bitch and can't read, let me repost the facts you keep trying to ignore:

Nothing you can say about NYC, LA, Bakersfield or Atlanta can trump the national average. Black and Mexicans are responsible for 65% of the nations crime, and Whites make up 72.4%. Even if you attribute all of the remaining 35% of crime to just whites, that means that white only commit less than half the per capita that they should.

Spin that, cocksucker.
 
Since you're an Internet bitch and can't read, let me repost the facts you keep trying to ignore:

Nothing you can say about NYC, LA, Bakersfield or Atlanta can trump the national average. Black and Mexicans are responsible for 65% of the nations crime, and Whites make up 72.4%. Even if you attribute all of the remaining 35% of crime to just whites, that means that white only commit less than half the per capita that they should.

Spin that, cocksucker.

I'm not the one who brought up the city comparison; you did with your ridiculous Atlanta comparison. I then debunked your theory by using NYC as a comparison; of course it was very painful trying to explain to you the difference between metro and city and who actually polices who.

It goes without saying that blacks and Hispanics are arrested and incarcerated at a higher rate than whites. Blacks and Hispanics also make up the vast majority of poor people in the U.S., a social class that is responsible for most of the crime. Being black does not mean you have a higher propensity for crime, it simply means you have a higher likelihood of being poor and therefore a higher likelihood of being exposed to crime. Whites and blacks smoke pot at the same rate, but blacks are the beneficiaries of 4X the arrest rate and 4X the incarceration rate of whites when it comes to drug possession.

If you removed social class and discrimination, you'd have a crime rate among all races that is pretty well distributed.

You interpretation of the national crime statistics is not only ignorant, it's racist...but what can you do...you're an ignorant :fucktard:


Racial Disparities in Criminal Justice
 
Back
Top