• Hello, this board in now turned off and no new posting.
    Please REGISTER at Anabolic Steroid Forums, and become a member of our NEW community!
  • Check Out IronMag Labs® KSM-66 Max - Recovery and Anabolic Growth Complex

Brilliant Perspective On Trayvon Shooting By "White Hispanic" - By David Duke

GearsMcGilf

Registered
Joined
Dec 30, 2009
Messages
5,903
Reaction score
1,249
Points
113
Location
AL
Media Goes into Overdrive over Florida Killing | The Official Website of Representative David Duke, PhD

Anther logical slam dunk by Rep. Duke.

Media Goes into Overdrive over Florida Killing

Hot on the heels of its anti-European frenzy over the Toulouse shootings, the controlled international mass media has excelled itself once again with the shooting of a black teenager in Florida—by a Mestizo Hispanic—and has turned that incident into an anti-European hate fest all of its own.

Even the American president, Barack Obama, has now climbed in on the debate, telling the media that “If I had a son, he’d look like Trayvon.” The victim, Trayvon Martin, was shot dead in Sanford, Florida by a 28-year-old Hispanic neighbourhood watch volunteer who said he was acting in self-defence.

The media frenzy is entirely artificial. Firstly, the shooting took place over a month ago—on 26 February.
Secondly, the shooter in this case is a 28-year old Hispanic. In US racial parlance, a “Hispanic” is someone who comes from Mexico, Central or South America.

The media has quite falsely claimed that the shooter, named George Zimmerman, is a “white Hispanic” —which is an indication of either their staggering bias or their crushing ignorance of race—and most likely a combination of both.

The description of the shooter as “white” has been enough to send the mass media into an orgiastic display of anti-white hatred. All over the US, there have been “anti-racist” rallies and (non-white) student protests over the “racism” which “led to the shootings.”

Even professional anti-white racist Jesse Jackson (who recently blighted Britain’s shores on a lecture about “racism” and the equally biased-media coverage given to the Stephen Lawrence murder in London), has jumped in on the action and announced that “blacks are under attack.”

Mr Jackson could not resist having a go at his traditional (and self-appointed) foes, whites in the southern states of the US. “African Americans have tried for decades to get the rest of America to understand their plight,” he said, “particularly their beliefs that justice is still elusive in many parts of America, especially the Deep South”—as if the shooting was the product of whites.

He also predicted that the “protests will continue to multiply in number and that the ranks of protestors will swell until Zimmerman is arrested.”

The outrageous claims made by the “protestors” include allegations that the victim was innocently passing by and was a “kid.”

In reality, the police investigation into the case—which will be presented to a grand jury within a few days—shows that the black “youth” (who was 6 foot 2 inches tall) attacked Zimmerman and beat him so severely that the Hispanic man was bleeding from the face.

When the police arrived at the scene, they found “Zimmerman bloody in his face and head, and the back of his shirt was wet and had grass stains, indicating a struggle took place before the shooting,” according to the report.

Zimmerman claimed he fired in self-defence, and all the available evidence supports his contention.
This has not stopped the anti-white hysteria from the US president down.
The coverage given this month-old incident is in marked contrast to the complete non-coverage given by the media to the never-ending string of black-on-white murders, assaults and rapes which take place in the US.

In those cases in which the race of the killer is known, blacks kill twice as many whites as whites kill blacks. Black-on-white robberies and gang assaults are twenty-one times more common than white on black. In the case of gang robbery, blacks victimize whites fifty-two times more often than whites do blacks (Department of Justice, Criminal Victimization in the United States, 1987).

The contrasts are even more stark in the case of interracial rape. 1996 was the first year that the statistics were broken down by race.

According to the US Justice Department 2006 rape statistics, 32,443 white women were raped by black men, and zero black women were raped by white men (Table 42).
According to the US Justice Department 2005 rape statistics, 37,460 white women were raped by black men, and zero black women raped by white men (Table 42).
According to the US Justice Department 2004 rape statistics, 11,611 white women were were raped by black men, and zero black women were raped by white men (Table 42).
According to the US Justice Department 2003 rape statistics, 20,309 white women were raped by black men, and zero black women were raped by white men (Table 42).
And so on. Yet the controlled media is strangely silent on the black-on-white crime plague in America, and instead chooses to focus on isolated incidents where blacks are the victim—and, as in the recent Florida case—will even blame white Americans for crimes committed by non-whites.
 
David Duke has put out some very informative and insightful material. Especially his material he's made that appears on youtube.

Duke is good. Problem is, whenever I say this or pass on his material people give a knee-jerk reaction because of his past.

Duke is worth following. Thanks for the website, article, and link.
 
But why would the media actually think that they would get away with passing him off as some WASP? Its fucking rediculous and doesnt make sense. Oh wait...The black people still dont get that theyre pawns in this. Being led around like puppets to go marching and help Jesse get his airtime again. his fat ass needs to be marching with those dems.
 
David Duke has put out some very informative and insightful material. Especially his material he's made that appears on youtube.

Duke is good. Problem is, whenever I say this or pass on his material people give a knee-jerk reaction because of his past.

Duke is worth following. Thanks for the website, article, and link.

Werd. Racism is fine as long as it is pointed in the right direction. Duke makes a lot of sense and has more education in his little finger than Al or Jesse have in their entire bodies. Speaking of Al & Jesse, I'm still wondering where they both received their doctorate degrees from and at what churches they preach. But, I'd be racist to ask. Also, you can't ask that, nor do you dare call their devisive, anti-white agendas racist.
 
I can`t wait for the DOJ to clear Zimmerman. The black kid was a thug and had a history of shady and violent behavior.

If anything all this has done is cause more racial tension by over hyping and using the phrase "hate crime" before all the facts had been released.
White people are getting sick of tip toeing around blacks so that we don`t offend them or come off as racist.

This WILL come to a head and more people will die.
But I guess that will be good for news ratings huh?
 
Racism typically goes hand in hand with unfounded remarks, speech personal bias. To me, how can it be racism if it's factual or statistically incriminating? You can't argue with facts. (unless you're a liberal) Are there people out there that just hate to hate? Are there people that hate with no foundation or basis for that? Absolutely there is. But, over the past couple of threads we've ALL provided links, facts, resources to back up our "racism." All of these which can't be disputed, twisted or thwarted, no matter how bad they attempt to do so.
 
I can`t wait for the DOJ to clear Zimmerman. The black kid was a thug and had a history of shady and violent behavior.

If anything all this has done is cause more racial tension by over hyping and using the phrase "hate crime" before all the facts had been released.
White people are getting sick of tip toeing around blacks so that we don`t offend them or come off as racist.

This WILL come to a head and more people will die.
But I guess that will be good for news ratings huh?

Eric Holder had no problem killing a white border patrol agent (Brian Terry) during his botched attempt to implement moregun control. There was no apology for weeks! The only reason this was an issue was because congressman Daryl Issa pressed for answers. He didn't want it "swept under the rug." Now, Eric Holder and his justice department want to jump the gun and stick their big noses where they don't belong because a black man was killed.
 
White people are getting sick of tip toeing around blacks so that we don`t offend them or come off as racist.

This is the reason that I started to be prejudiced against blacks.

Growing up, I never did shit to any black based on his race. Not once. But as I grew older, I started catching shit for just being white. Oh, it was nothing that I did, it was shit that white people did decades or centuries before I was born. This caused me to look into the black American mentality. Which I found to be deficient in logic and very, very racist. So I looked at what it's like where blacks come from...and it all made sense.

For those that continue that say that whites should catch shit for stuff their ancestors did, I say, "If I'm going to catch shit for being a slave owner, then were's my slave?"
 
Last edited:
I read a bit of what David Duke wrote and he does make a few good points but.......he was once the Grand Wizard of the Knights of the Ku Klux Klan.

He's in the same league a Jesse Jackson and Sharpton.
 
Muscle Gelz Transdermals
IronMag Labs Prohormones
The Imperial Wizard, DOMS.
 
This is the reason that I started to be prejudiced against blacks.

Growing up, I never did shit to any black based on his race. Not once. But as I grew older, I started catching shit for just being white. Oh, it was nothing that I did, it was shit that white people did decades or centuries before I was born. This caused me to look into the black American mentality. Which I found to be deficient in logic and very, very racist. So I looked at what it's like where blacks come from...and it all made sense.

For those that continue that say that whites should catch shit for stuff their ancestors did, I say, "If I'm going to catch shit for being a slave owner, then were's my slave?"

Ask ANY black person if they wish that slavery had never happened and they were back in Africa chasing monkeys with spears and living in huts.

Yeah what happened way back then was bad but look what they have now! SHUT THE FUCK UP AND GET OVER IT!!!!
Even the Jews don`t bitch as much as blacks and they had it WAY worse.
 
Ask ANY black person if they wish that slavery had never happened and they were back in Africa chasing monkeys with spears and living in huts.

Yeah what happened way back then was bad but look what they have now! SHUT THE FUCK UP AND GET OVER IT!!!!
Even the Jews don`t bitch as much as blacks and they had it WAY worse.
Something I read elsewhere about slavery reparations:

"Obviously all the people actually involved are dead now so there is nothing I can do for them so it's their ancestors I feel I must recompense.

I have a simple formula, all we need to do it work out the average yearly income of African Americans and the average income of Africans to get a figure of how much worse off the African Americans are. Then multilply that by the average lifespan of an African American and the number of them who can prove their ancestors were slaves.

I'll accept payment in gold bullion."
 
The biggest issue I have with the slave mentality is just that, they keep the mentality. There are not too many groups of people that have been treated worse, historically than the Jews.

And now we own everything.
 
this is the reason that i started to be prejudiced against blacks.

Growing up, i never did shit to any black based on his race. Not once. But as i grew older, i started catching shit for just being white. Oh, it was nothing that i did, it was shit that white people did decades or centuries before i was born. This caused me to look into the black american mentality. Which i found to be deficient in logic and very, very racist. So i looked at what it's like where blacks come from...and it all made sense.

For those that continue that say that whites should catch shit for stuff their ancestors did, i say, "if i'm going to catch shit for being a slave owner, then were's my slave?"

preach doms, preach!
 
preach doms, preach!

When people find out that I don't like blacks, they assume it's for some stupid reason like skin color. They also assume that I dislike all non-whites.

Then they find out they're wrong.

I base my decision on my own experience and on the facts. So some races I like (Thai, Japanese, Samoans, Tongans, Hawaiians, Jewish, etc.) and others I don't (Mexicans, blacks, Arabs, etc.). Keep in mind it's not a 100% blanket. There are some Japanese individuals I don't like and some blacks that I do, but it's a general rule for dealing with the given races.

Imagine that, judging races on how they act. I know, crazy...
 
If you came to Hawaii you'd find Hawaiian, Tongan, Samoans, Filipinos, Micronesians you don't like. Especially after you get your first "Hey you fucking Haolie, go back to the mainland!" or you see a group of pacific islanders dressed like thugsters pile out of their SUV and acting like loud idiots. Micronesians and filipinos remind me of Mexicans back in Texas. I don't judge people, but I understand it's hard not to norice the stereo-types.

I started hating white people when I used to visit my mom in Missouri in the summers and saw all of these white trash welfare scrounging deadbeats.

Then in the Navy I met so many people from such different backgrounds and spent time with them and all of my pre-concieved notions of people disappeared. We're all products of our environments and some enviroments are polluted, we can't assume everyone who looks like they came from those environments are the same...
 
I read a bit of what David Duke wrote and he does make a few good points but.......he was once the Grand Wizard of the Knights of the Ku Klux Klan.

He's in the same league a Jesse Jackson and Sharpton.

You're making a huge mistake not taking his words at face value. Forget who he was, simply focus on what he's saying.
 
Maybe I learned about this late, but I always thought he was Hispanic. I never heard him referred to as "white".

I thought it was odd that a Hispanic had the last name of Zimmerman.
 
You're making a huge mistake not taking his words at face value. Forget who he was, simply focus on what he's saying.

I don't disagree with anything he wrote, well I actually skimmed through most of it. nonetheless, his name is poison.
 
I don't disagree with anything he wrote, well I actually skimmed through most of it. nonetheless, his name is poison.

No it's not, it's David Duke. People be hatin' on him because he was a Klan leader. But, folks don't understand that there's more to the klan than just lynching blacks and blowing up synagogues. I liked his idea about drug screenings for welfare recipients. Hell, in some states, state employees are required to take random drug tests. So, why is it unreasonable or "racist" to require that people get tested when they're being paid to sit on their lazy ass and pop out futture welfare recipients? I guess the liberals who're against it are implying that ALL people on welfare are minorities. :hmmm:
 
Then in the Navy I met so many people from such different backgrounds and spent time with them and all of my pre-concieved notions of people disappeared. We're all products of our environments and some enviroments are polluted, we can't assume everyone who looks like they came from those environments are the same...

Ever heard the saying "I'm not a racist, I'm a culturalist."? It kinda makes sense to me. Everyone is a culturalist to some degree because we can't escape having preferences, beliefs, values, etc and those are things that help define a culture. Hell, even dogs are racist. The PC cloud that hangs over all of us says anything that could be construed as negative relating to race makes you a racist and any form of racism is evil. There's not even a strict scientific classification of racism but whatever it is is definitely evil we're made to believe.

Wiki says "Racism is the belief that inherent different traits in human racial groups justify discrimination."
However, most of the time just acknowledging different traits will get you labeled as a racist. Also, consider the part about discrimination. Saying black people like fried chicken is technically a way of discriminating but is it really wrong? No one was injured in anyway. The statement isn't even derogatory. Fried chicken is fucking delicious. My point is that the word Racism gets thrown around too often and depending on how some of the words in the definition are qualified is racism always morally wrong?
An example: If don't want to date Mexicans are you racist? You're justifying discrimination based on inherent traits. I think according to the above definition it's technically racist but I don't think it's morally wrong.



 
BTW, it looks like all the libbies have abandoned the thread and it's down to just us having a neonazi circle jerk up in here. LOL We've conquered this thread and it is OURS!!!

ch15.php
 
BTW, it looks like all the libbies have abandoned the thread and it's down to just us having a neonazi circle jerk up in here. LOL We've conquered this thread and it is OURS!!!

ch15.php

Amen to that! (fist in air)
 
BTW, it looks like all the libbies have abandoned the thread and it's down to just us having a neonazi circle jerk up in here. LOL We've conquered this thread and it is OURS!!!

ch15.php

lol. yeah I think the steady flow of new information about what REALLY happened that night and who Martin really was is going to make a lot of those PC Hoodie bitches shut up and move on to the next cause they can protest and bitch about.

lesson learned?? KEEP YOUR FUCKING MOUTH SHUT UNTIL YOU KNOW ALL THE FACTS!!!! And that goes double for high profile people like....ummmmm........ the president! Who has no right to get his personal views involved in a case that is still under investigation.
 
lol. yeah I think the steady flow of new information about what REALLY happened that night and who Martin really was is going to make a lot of those PC Hoodie bitches shut up and move on to the next cause they can protest and bitch about.

lesson learned?? KEEP YOUR FUCKING MOUTH SHUT UNTIL YOU KNOW ALL THE FACTS!!!! And that goes double for high profile people like....ummmmm........ the president! Who has no right to get his personal views involved in a case that is still under investigation.

Amen to that!!
 
No it's not, it's David Duke. People be hatin' on him because he was a Klan leader. But, folks don't understand that there's more to the klan than just lynching blacks and blowing up synagogues. I liked his idea about drug screenings for welfare recipients. Hell, in some states, state employees are required to take random drug tests. So, why is it unreasonable or "racist" to require that people get tested when they're being paid to sit on their lazy ass and pop out futture welfare recipients? I guess the liberals who're against it are implying that ALL people on welfare are minorities. :hmmm:
I like that idea also but it was a republican who shot that idea down once they asked Politicians to do the same.

We work for both the state and city and we get tested randomly.
 
And that goes double for high profile people like....ummmmm........ the president! Who has no right to get his personal views involved in a case that is still under investigation.
He should have waited till it was fully investigated.
 
Back
Top