• Hello, this board in now turned off and no new posting.
    Please REGISTER at Anabolic Steroid Forums, and become a member of our NEW community!
  • Check Out IronMag Labs® KSM-66 Max - Recovery and Anabolic Growth Complex

Man of Steel

What Would Happen If Superman Punched You? - DesignTAXI.com

YouTuber Jake, from the channel VSauce3, recently explored what would happen if you got punched by Superman.

For one thing, you wouldn't be able to see the punch coming. Superman's punch travels faster than your brain can process the information.

His punch is also 2,800 times more powerful than the nuclear bomb on Hiroshima.

In short, Superman's punch is strong enough to liquefy and disintegrate your atoms before you even know what is happening.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
American Cities I'd Prefer To See Get Blown Up In The Movies Instead of New York - The Awl | The Awl

American Cities I'd Prefer To See Get Blown Up In The Movies Instead of New York

30. Providence

29. Little Rock

28. Des Moines

27. Houston

26. Olympia

25. Cincinnati

24. Fargo

23. Omaha

22. Albuquerque

21. Louisville

20. Orlando

19. St. Paul

18. Las Vegas

17. Denver

16. Seattle

15. Memphis

14. Columbus

13. Cheyenne

12. Phoenix

11. Salt Lake City

10. Milwaukee

9. Springfield (all)

8. Kansas City, MO

7. Kansas City, KS

6. Pittsburgh

5. Portland (both)

4. Baltimore

3. Hartford

2. Trenton

1. Stamford






Evelyn Everlady is the pen name of a woman in New York City, who is actually so over her terrible ex-boyfriend that she doesn't even care enough to write about him any more, unfortunately for all of us.

I notice Detroit isn't on your list. Because it already looks devastated?
 
My argument is that you are reading too much into it. It's a movie.

A movie that gave us rehashed CGI action, inconsistent characters, and a story with holes in it. I think all of my arguments have shown to be valid.

I don't have any problem with you saying overlook all of that, that's valid, but for 9 bucks a ticket I expect more from my movies. Warner Bros. Owes me a good product.
 
A movie that gave us rehashed CGI action, inconsistent characters, and a story with holes in it. I think all of my arguments have shown to be valid.

I don't have any problem with you saying overlook all of that, that's valid, but for 9 bucks a ticket I expect more from my movies. Warner Bros. Owes me a good product.

Easy enough to take care of. Write them to let them know of your dissatisfaction and you will spend your money on the productions of other studios. You are right, at $9 they should serve up a good product. I saw it at the matinee price of $6. For my $6 I got a big screen, surround sound, and over two hours of entertainment.
 
Movie was awesome thread closed!
 
17 bucks a ticket for IMAX 3D. This moving in Imax 3d regardless of expense was f'ing sweet. It was made for 3D

Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk 2
 
the dude is a pikey,,,didnt know that lol....

I had to look up that term pikey. I didn't really get it until I saw Snatch for the first time tonight. It is on the Sundance channel right now. You might be careful with that. They might react the way they did in the movie. lol
 
Video: Henry Cavill on why he wanted his Superman to have a hairy chest

Video: Henry Cavill on why he wanted his Superman to have a hairy chest

"Sacrilege!" and "This is not Superman!" were the cries that greeted MAN OF STEEL set photos in late 2011 when photos of a bearded, super-shredded and extremely hirsute Henry Cavill leaked online. The primal beast-like appearance seemed aggressively alpha masculine compared to the gentler depictions of Superman in the earlier films and media and something more suited to Wolverine suggested many people.

MAN OF STEEL star Cavill had previously shaved his torso for the 2011 actioner Immortals to show off his muscle definition, but for MAN OF STEEL, he decided to give the razor a skip. Here's why.

It's something that I wanted to because in the comic book Death of Superman, there's this bit where his costume's ripped, and he's making the ultimate sacrifice and he's got this hairy chest and I was like "Okay, Why is the perception that because he's muscly, he must have no body hair?" And I thought why can't we just do that, like in the comic books. And so we did.

And well because, real men have chest hair!
 
Zack Snyder & The MAN OF STEEL Cast On The Possibility Of Seeing Doomsday In A Sequel

Zack Snyder & The MAN OF STEEL Cast On The Possibility Of Seeing Doomsday In A Sequel

When Zack Snyder is asked when he thinks would be the right time to "unleash Doomsday", the director suggests that it's always a possibility now that Man Of Steel has opened the doors of the DC cinematic universe. Amy Adams thinks Doomsday would be cool (suggesting that Lex Luthor could introduce the character), but would prefer Bizarro. Michael Shannon admits that although he's heard of the "Death Of Superman", he could never get into the comic books, and Henry Cavill simply hopes it happens and thinks it'd be awesome.

I'm sure if Man Of Steel does kick off a franchise, it will only be a matter of time before Doomsday makes an appearance, but I'm not sure it would (or should) be in the second movie.

 
Muscle Gelz Transdermals
IronMag Labs Prohormones
Spoiler Alert: Don't read if you haven't seen it, but these are some of my major beefs with this Superman Story

Superman: He is a killer now? When did this happen?

Who wrote this?

When? Superman II.

He exposed the three villains to Gold Kryptonite, robbed them of their powers and pitched Zod away like a dirty sock. Superman 1, Zod 0.

Likewise Superman IV. What do you think happened to Nuclear Man when Superman dropped him in that reactor? Dead Nuclear Man is dead.

And don't get me started on the comic books.

Author doesn't know shit. :thumb:
 
Who wrote this?

When? Superman II.

He exposed the three villains to Gold Kryptonite, robbed them of their powers and pitched Zod away like a dirty sock. Superman 1, Zod 0.

Likewise Superman IV. What do you think happened to Nuclear Man when Superman dropped him in that reactor? Dead Nuclear Man is dead.

And don't get me started on the comic books.

Author doesn't know shit. :thumb:

I forgot all about that! Superman III, he kills his evil self. Chokes him to death. Superman IV, he kills the sun guy that Lex Luthor made.
 
Scoop: What Wonderful Easter Egg Was Cut From Man Of Steel? - Comic Book Therapy

Scoop: What Wonderful Easter Egg Was Cut From Man Of Steel?

Those of you tDianaPrincehat follow me on Twitter or know me personally know that I was amped for Man Of Steel. Years and years of anticipation for one of my favorite characters to return to the big screen had me at a fever pitch for the movie to hit. Getting me even more excited for the film, was that I had made some trusted contacts that were providing me with information about the film. Most of them were covered during my time at another site, but I have dropped a few here as well.

One of those was that Wayne Enterprises was getting a name drop in the movie. This was later confirmed by director Zack Snyder himself, and by now most have seen it in the movie. Not only was that in there, but there was lots of other little ones in there such as S.T.A.R. Labs and LexCorp.

However, there was one that I knew about that I teased on Twitter, that I wouldn?t reveal. It was a character that was due for some sort of big screen attention that I wanted people to be surprised by when they saw it. The surprised on was me, however, when I didn?t see it in the film. So I asked, and it appears as if the scene has been cut from the movie. So I have decided to write this little piece up about what it is I know.

Spoilers About Man Of Steel From This Point:

Okay, during the battle of Smallville, Supes gets walloped into a bank, and smashes a vault door. During this sequence, while in the bank, two things were cut out. The first one, which was reported on back in April, is the Mayor of Plano, IL, where the Smallville scenes were shot, had a small cameo in the film as the bank manager. But what I also heard was that there was a Diana Prince Easter Egg somewhere in the bank too.

As you probably know, Diana Prince is the alter ego of Wonder Woman. I wasn?t given the exact details of the scene, but this past April, Empire came out with their Man Of Steel issue where they said, ?Look out for a particularly oh-my-god-I-can?t-believe-this-is-happening bank teller?. Based on what I have been told and what they learned, all signs point to that possibly being the reference. Also, whether or not this makes it on to the blu-ray/DVD extras, who knows. Snyder has said there was only one scene cut from the film. That all the cutting came by shortening scenes down, so this would fall into this category.

With all the Justice League talk floating around, it will be interesting to see how these character Easter Eggs will add to the cohesive universe they are trying to build. Could you just imagine Bruce Wayne telling Superman he owns him money for the satellite him a Zod destroyed? Regardless, with Man Of Steel?s box office things are looking up for DC?s cinematic universe.
 
Superman pins tren :coffee:
 
the fight scenes were bland, the character development was poor. It was cool to see krypton, but there were so many holes in the story as to be disappointing.

Jeff Sorensen: 4 Complaints of Man Of Steel (and Why They're Bullsh*t)

I recently watched the Donner cut of Superman 2. The original was so cheesy that even watching it when I was little made me think Superman was kind of not right for the screen. The Donner cut made it a little better, but then he flew around the world and turn back time negating the events of the movie which ultimately left the entire thing pointless, again.

In that time, Superhero movies were in their infancy, so I give them leeway because of it. But now, we are neck deep in superhero movies and their sequels, sequels to those sequels, television shows, and superhero film spin offs to television shows. Man of Steel had a lot riding on it because Superman has been kind of a letdown in popular media. They tried to reboot him with Superman Returns, but it was boring, and he just fought a mountain and stalked Lois Lane, or had to explain himself to Lois like a boyfriend who had to justify hanging out with his friends without her. Lots of complaints about Man of Steel have come up, and they're from people who should stop breathing with their mouths open.

Too Much Destruction

What a lot of critics are saying is that there is too much damage done to cities and to people in the film. If you base this on Superman 2, where the biggest thing destroyed was a bus that flew a foot off the ground into Superman, then I guess you're right. But when you read the comics, watch the cartoons, this amount of destruction is a comic norm. You think that when superheroes and supervillains fight in a city they aren't going to destroy a lot of real estate? The Avengers sort of destroyed a lot, but most of the time was just aliens riding around on their Jet-ski's with no real objective other than to be attacked by the superheroes (Not you Hawkeye or Black Widow). This movie finally showed what superheroes fighting were supposed to look like. When Superman punched he broke the sound barrier. My childhood inside was overwhelmed with how bad I've waited to see a Superman fight done right.

Not Enough Character Development

Complaints are coming in that Superman's character wasn't that developed. People who say this must have spent the first half of the film in the bathroom because they slammed their 64oz gut busting cherry squishy during the previews. The flashbacks and exposition of Clark Kent's life reinvented the backstory of him learning his powers, being taught to hone them by Jonathan Kent, and also when not to use them (Even his Jonathan saying he possibly should have let that bus of kids drown). We watch Clark act like a teenager who is defiant, go through emotional pain, and learn life lessons that lead him to the present time in the movie. It's a brilliant set up where we learn about him and the both sides of him and his family.

It Was Too Serious

Who cares? Superman can be serious. Sure, even the dark, gritty Batman series by Nolan had jabs of humor in it, but does that make them even better because of it? There were a few chuckle moments in this movie, but the seriousness overshadowed it. Again, bringing up Superman 2, that movie was full of chuckle moments. By chuckle, I mean "This movie is awful." Remember when Superman ripped off the cellophane "S" off of his chest and threw it at Zod's enforcer? That should have ruined the franchise. And then there was Superman 3 with Richard Pryor. What? Who thought that was a good idea?

(Boardroom)
Yes man -- "We need a Superman 3. Ideas?"
Exec -- "Wife and I just saw that funny black man, Richard Pryor. Put him in that."
Yes man -- "Ye...yeah, okay."
(Yes man looks over at group of writers wondering if the high-rise window is shatterproof.)

Superman Was Too Emotional

Imagine going through grade school knowing that you could beat everyone up, but you're bullied because you allow it because a punch could decapitate them. Imagine being the outsider for all of your life because you don't know your place or your purpose. Imagine on top of puberty, you can see through everything and you can't control it yet. Imagine you lose the person closest to you when you needed them the most. Oh, and you're also an alien. Would you not be an emotional mess of a person, let alone a God on a planet? This makes Superman become a stronger person emotionally, mentally, and even more physically as the movie progresses. He learns that there is no limit to his strengths and keeps overcoming his boundaries.

I suggest you go into this movie expecting what you've always wanted: A superhero movie done right with a hint of realism that brings you back to when your imagination wanted and hoped for more. That's what I got out of Man of Steel.
 
Clay Enos : Junsui Films

The Still Photographer chats exclusively to Junsui Films about his creative relationship with the Snyders, the advantages of shooting on location, the power of the still image, and tells us all about his latest film, MAN OF STEEL
 
Exclusive: Zack Snyder Wants Mark Strong As Lex Luthor For Man of Steel 2 - Cosmic Book News

Exclusive: Zack Snyder Wants Mark Strong As Lex Luthor For Man of Steel 2

With Man of Steel tipping the scales domestically at over $200 million it seems a sequel is more than likely, with lots of talk surrounding that.

Both director Zack Snyder and Henry Cavill have stated they want more Superman before the Justice League movie, as well as mention of Big Blue taking the lead in the JL film as well.

There has also been a rather large development at Warner Bros. in regards to WB Movie president Jeff Robinov apparently leaving; just how that affects the DC movies remains to be seen.

Chatting with our DC Entertainment source, we were told the following.

Robinov was a big DC supporter; depends what the new guy at the top thinks, but the source is pretty sure all of WB will get behind the DCCU after Man of Steel.

We were told a tidbit regarding General Swanwick in the Man of Steel as the character was originally General Lane, and that is how Lois got access to Superman when he surrendered. They changed it around and replaced General Lane with General Swanwick played by Harry Lennix.

The source says it's been said that filming for the Man of Steel sequel will be begin next year, and Mark Strong is wanted for Lex Luthor by Zack Snyder. Expect pre-production to start coming together by October-December.

David Goyer is hard at work on a first draft of the screenplay for Man of Steel 2. The source says Chris Nolan is sort of overseeing the script/story, but may not have as much input as before as he is focusing on his new film project, Interstellar.

The source noted he would personally like Jonathan Nolan to help Goyer with the screenplay.

Also, David Goyer has a short treatment for Justice League, but there is no story or script so far.

Our DC Entertainment source previously provided us information on the Man of Steel including the bus crash scene that was featured in the movie and more.
 
A movie that gave us rehashed CGI action, inconsistent characters, and a story with holes in it. I think all of my arguments have shown to be valid.

I don't have any problem with you saying overlook all of that, that's valid, but for 9 bucks a ticket I expect more from my movies. Warner Bros. Owes me a good product.

i agree with you, the first flight seen CGI was horrible but it did get better, the story was ok but not epic. The movie was worth my time and money though, but it did not leave me with the feeling that i have to see more. I feel they could have gone more into his development which would make more people understand the impact of the ending more. My wife was like why is he upset about killing ZOD but she does not realize Supermans ethic code that he has. It would have really made that last seen more of a holy shit factor.

loise lanes character was pretty boring as well.

They should have also left it more open at the end, perhaps showing lex luther studying recordings of him and trying to find out who he really is.
 
'Man of Steel' and Everything You Need to Know About the Planet Krypton | Movie News | Movies.com

'Man of Steel' and Everything You Need to Know About the Planet Krypton


Superman?s home planet Krypton is always different depending on the continuity, yet certain aspects always remain the same. For instance, Jor-El is always the ?Cassandra? character who knows that the planet is going to explode while the Kryptonian Council refuses to believe his findings. Nearly everything else about it -- including the reason for its destruction -- changes constantly. There was a time when the planet was in the same orbit as Earth, but on the other side of our sun, so until we had space travel it was technically possible and we wouldn?t have known any better. In some versions, the planet?s star would explode, or something that happened 100,000 years earlier was finally destroying the planet. For Man of Steel, David S. Goyer came up with yet another unique reason.

The ancient history of the planet changes just as frequently with each continuity, at least when it?s mentioned at all. But usually it had a harsh terrain with big freaky-looking animals. In 1994, Dan Jurgens suggested that Doomsday, the beast that actually killed Superman, was a product of a scientific experiment performed on ancient Krypton. Its creator would send it out to the planet?s surface where it would be torn apart by the violent creatures that lived there, then collect the DNA to clone him over and over again until he adapted and was able to defeat them.

In contrast, the Krypton shown in the 1978 film (see above) with Christopher Reeve appeared to be icy and made partly of crystals that grew in specific ways from their technology. The film also suggested for the first time that Superman?s ?S? symbol was a family crest, which changed its meaning entirely. Even the comics wouldn?t adapt to that until about a decade ago. Then again, that film made a number of changes to Superman?s history, and many of them stuck or were used in later versions, such as the town of Smallville being specifically in Kansas instead of an unnamed state in Middle America.

In Man of Steel there are several animals shown on Krypton, such as the elephant-sized Rondor beast and flying creatures called h?raka. Jerry Ordway drew the art for the prequel comic and had this to say:

"I can tell you that I drew the h'raka differently inside the comic, from a production painting, where they looked somewhat aquatic, crossed with a dragonfly. Then by the time I drew the cover image, I had been given different reference that showed the creature as more batlike, with a pitbull face. I was a bit mad that I hadn't had that reference for the earlier page, but esthetically the earlier design of the creature evoked a more classic science fiction vibe, which I liked. The question is, I guess, 'If you were riding one of these creatures, as Jor-El does, would you prefer a bat or a flying dolphin?' I'd prefer the dolphin, as it is less threatening looking, and beautiful. A bat is just scary looking."

But the most interesting thing about Krypton was something subtle in the movie. Because it is larger and denser than Earth, it has a higher gravity, so even without the powers that our yellow sun can give to a Kryptonian, like flight or vision abilities, they are already stronger and faster. In an interview with screenwriter David S. Goyer on the set of the movie in August, 2011, he explained,

"It was always just, if this kind of really happened in the real world, even in terms of how his powers work, I mean, Zack and his team did a really interesting sort of scale of power, and they did a sort of how much fire power each of the... a 40 caliber bullet, a 50?you know, these kinds of things, like a shell grenade would work on a human versus a Kryptonian. Like, you?ll get the physics on all of that, so that like, an M-4 would knock a human back this far. An M-4 would knock a Kryptonian back this far. You know, the fire power from the A-10 Warthogs would knock a human back this far. It will knock a Kryptonian back this far. So, we sort of get all the physics on it, or Zack?s team did all the physics, so that it?s that attempt. So there are rules and science rules within this movie and this universe that things have to apply to, so it?s not just like, magically do whatever. The Kryptonians can jump yea high in our gravity kind of thing. They can punch this hard, lift this much, that sort of thing."

This goes back to the first page of Action Comics #1, which was Superman?s first appearance in 1938. Instead of flying, Superman could jump approximately one eighth of a mile, which is the equivalent of leaping a tall building in a single bound. In the book ?The Physics of Superheroes? by James Kakalios, the author used real physics and compared how high and far a healthy human could jump on Earth to Superman?s leap. He concluded that Krypton?s mass would have to be roughly 15 times that of Earth just to have the right kind of gravity for the explanation given in the early comics. Similar rules exist in Man of Steel.

The society of Krypton also plays an important role. When the Superman comic book story was rebooted in 1986, writer John Byrne suggested that earlier Kryptonian society relied on clones that could be used for spare parts. By Jor-El?s time, the population rate was under specific control and the people tended to live for a very long time, so someone dying or having a child were rare events. Instead of having sex and the mother carrying the fetus for nine months, their DNA would be put together in a birthing matrix until the time came to open it. It was that ?egg? that was sent to Earth, allowing the baby Kal-El to be literally born in Kansas. In an imaginary future, Superman was even elected president of the United States, which was only possible because he had been born in Kansas and not Krypton.

When Geoff Johns began heading up the comics writing team in 2008, he suggested a specific caste/guild system where certain Kryptonians were born to have specific jobs such as science, military, worker, government and so on. In the same interview with David S. Goyer, he explained,

"One of the things that we tried to do in this film was depict Krypton as a truly alien world and not something that was influenced by Flash Gordon or Alex Raymond but a truly alien world. One of the things that we decided early on with Krypton, we drilled down really deep all the various art departments in terms of figuring out the history. Some of this we pulled from comic books. Some of this, we had to fill in the gaps that didn?t exist. But, the gods, the religions, the Krypton, the different guilds and the caste systems, the language we created, a Kryptonian language. So, in all of the?when you see Krypton, there?s a lot of temples and things like that where there will be etchings in stone and all of the things that are rendered in the Kryptonian glyphs can actually be translated into things. So, we wrote each god as a sort of motto in saying each guild has a motto and saying and there?s some Easter eggs in there."

Man of Steel?s version of Krypton is not necessarily different from others, but I did notice a number of references in the scenes on the planet as well as much of the rest of the film. Be sure to come back to Movies.com on Monday for the list of all the Easter eggs and references I caught.

Krypton itself is and needs to be a very interesting and alien place, but I wouldn?t want to live there, especially when it?s about to explode.
 
Will A MAN OF STEEL Sequel Hit As Early As...Next Year?!

Will A MAN OF STEEL Sequel Hit As Early As...Next Year?!

In a piece on the recent box office success of Man of Steel, The Wall Street Journal has seemingly revealed that the sequel is being planned for release as early as NEXT YEAR. "Warner is already in development on a sequel to "Man of Steel" and is expected to fast track that for release as soon as 2014, said knowledgeable people close to the studio. In addition, it has long been developing a "Justice League" team-up movie featuring characters such as the Flash and Wonder Woman that could come out as soon as 2015." While this may seem unlikely, it's not exactly unheard of. Fast & Furious 6 came out this year and the seventh instalment of that franchise will be released in a little over a year from now. However, they would need to start work on the movie almost immediately to make this a reality, and Henry Cavill's next project is supposed to be The Man From U.N.C.L.E.. Whether this is a mistake or just a sign that the studio are anxious to establish a new franchise as quickly as possible remains to be seen. We should however find out one way or the other at this year's San Diego Comic Con.
 
Antje Traue Was On The Verge Of Quitting Acting Before Landing Faora-Ul Role

Antje Traue Was On The Verge Of Quitting Acting Before Landing Faora-Ul Role

"Man of Steel's" Antje Traue gave herself a deadline, she would either 'make it' as an actress by age 30 or leave the profession. Lucky for her, she landed the role of Faora-Ul in Zack Snyder's Superman reboot at age 29. Her performance as the genetically-engineered Kryptonian killing machine is drawing universal praise and has more than a few lips voicing a strong desire to see her character return in a "Man of Steel" sequel. In describing her preparation for the role, Traue admits to being a bit of a method actor and to that end she abstained from overly fraternizing with her co-stars to make her performance seem more cold and alien.

Looking back to an earlier point in her life, Traue says she wasn't going to make it as an actress in Germany. "They said, ?You?re not famous enough for the lead roles, and you?re too present for the supporting roles ? you?d overpower the lead," said the 'Tigress of Zod'. To that end, she sought fame elsewhere and landed the role in her very first audition for an English-language film, a lead role in 2009's Pandorum. But that initial luck was atypical, as Traue then lost out on unspecified roles in "The Hobbit", "Mission: Impossible - Ghost Protocol" and a few other films. Things had digressed to a point where Traue was working at a restaurant when the call for "Man of Steel" auditions came in. The actress was hesitant at first, fearful of another rejection. She admitted, "I was at a point where I didn?t want to do it. I was exhausted from so many rejections, and I thought, ?How many other girls are going to go for this?? Maybe I was aiming too high."

But as her 30th birthday loomed, Traue decided to throw one last 'all or nothing' toss of the dice. It worked, "And then everything started coming in," the actress exclaimed.

Traue can next bee seen as one of the leads in another "Warner Bros." joint venture with "Legendary Pictures", "Seventh Son".
 
watched it yesterday. no complaints about the movie, especially since I was butt sober. I was entertained for 2hrs so mission accomplished.
 
Wired: Designing Krypton's Tech

 
I hate to say it but an Aquaman movie would fall on its face.
 
Back
Top