This is such a complicated discussion not even the best economists can figure it out.
but it's not that complicated dozens of world ranked economists write reports on this very subject all the time, it's not that difficult to understand.
spending levels were on historical trends as the FED graph on spending clearly shows but revenues took a dump because of the tax cuts in 2001 and 2003. you can even see where Clinton was able to close the gap when he reduced spending AND increased REVENUES during the good times.
George Akerlof called it in 2003 and warned of the deficits that the Bush tax cuts were going to create THEN on top of that you add in the decreased revenues from job losses and income and corporations shifting profits after the economic downturn, this stuff isn't rocket science.
'Horrendous': Nobel economist George Akerlof criticizes Bush economic stimulus package
Last edited: