Hi, I was wondering if someone can chime in on the basic differences between the 3 of these compounds.
I have yet to try any kind of 19-nor other than deca.
Just so anyone can be aware, the 'Tren-Dione' is a PH on a UK site, & it states that is does in fact convert to the real tren, whereas the original PH compound is just a few notches off in the chemical structure.
'Tren-Dione' (estra-4,9,11-triene-3,17-dione)
VS.
PH Tren (19-norandrosta-4-9,diene-3)
VS.
Tren (Enan., Ace, Hex...etc)
I am mainly curious as to how the 'Tren-Dione' would compare to Tren Ace in terms of release time, half-life, & over-all effectiveness regarding a full out bulk.
As a second question I would greatly appreciate being answered; My burning question as to which compound best suites a bulking stack (hypothetically), consisting of Abombs, & Test E.
I've read up on all the short-term sides, & long-term sides of 19-nor compounds; yet if Tren is anything similar to Deca (@ 500/week) regarding sides, I think I'll be ok; As I have dealt with profuse sweating, & ED effectively enough.)
I keep getting told that tren isn't really fit for a full-out 4-month bulk; also taking into account that I seldom ever exceed 10% BF, aka I can always see the v-line protruding, as well as all 6 bumps, as well as being able to fit a coin (quarter) 85% deep in between each pair of bumps.
(I understand my explanation of my BF % is unorthodox, but I feel that you'll get the picture quite vividly this way.)
Basically, what I would like to know, is if any of these particular 19-nor compounds would really truly benefit the weight gain regarding the entire overall mass obtained within a 4 month period (with the compounds I mentioned above) being followed by a fairly agressive 6-week PCT protocol, IF I wasn't concerned with cutting BF % at all.
Thank you in advance for any potential input.
~Tre
I have yet to try any kind of 19-nor other than deca.
Just so anyone can be aware, the 'Tren-Dione' is a PH on a UK site, & it states that is does in fact convert to the real tren, whereas the original PH compound is just a few notches off in the chemical structure.
'Tren-Dione' (estra-4,9,11-triene-3,17-dione)
VS.
PH Tren (19-norandrosta-4-9,diene-3)
VS.
Tren (Enan., Ace, Hex...etc)
I am mainly curious as to how the 'Tren-Dione' would compare to Tren Ace in terms of release time, half-life, & over-all effectiveness regarding a full out bulk.
As a second question I would greatly appreciate being answered; My burning question as to which compound best suites a bulking stack (hypothetically), consisting of Abombs, & Test E.
I've read up on all the short-term sides, & long-term sides of 19-nor compounds; yet if Tren is anything similar to Deca (@ 500/week) regarding sides, I think I'll be ok; As I have dealt with profuse sweating, & ED effectively enough.)
I keep getting told that tren isn't really fit for a full-out 4-month bulk; also taking into account that I seldom ever exceed 10% BF, aka I can always see the v-line protruding, as well as all 6 bumps, as well as being able to fit a coin (quarter) 85% deep in between each pair of bumps.
(I understand my explanation of my BF % is unorthodox, but I feel that you'll get the picture quite vividly this way.)
Basically, what I would like to know, is if any of these particular 19-nor compounds would really truly benefit the weight gain regarding the entire overall mass obtained within a 4 month period (with the compounds I mentioned above) being followed by a fairly agressive 6-week PCT protocol, IF I wasn't concerned with cutting BF % at all.
Thank you in advance for any potential input.
~Tre