41761911
Registered
I have always had this problem in the back of my head: (along with others...)
I understand that 13-15 x LBM gives approximate maintenance calories.
Plus - using the Harris Benedict etc you can multiply BMR by 1.2 for sedentry, 1.375 for light/moderate exercise 3 times a week and so on to find TDEE.
But: If my BMR gives 1750 cals/day. Then, spending almost everyday studying/desk-jobing for most of the day, my TDEE would be around 2100 (1750 x 1.2).
However, I do Gym 3 days a week, and minimum 20 mins of moderate cardio every "off-day" [4 days a week].
So, if I only count cardio as "light exercise", would that make my TDEE 1750 x 1.375 = 2400/day?
OR
Would TDEE be 2100 + plus (say 250 calories burnt doing cardio that day) = 2350
Why is TDEE higher if you multiply BMR using the 1.2/1.375 etc - is this showing the "metabolic effect" of exercise?
I am 6ft (186cms), 180lbs (82kgs), around 19-20% BF (LBM = 145lbs approx)
Thanks for your time - this will probably show how stupid I am...
Best regards.
I understand that 13-15 x LBM gives approximate maintenance calories.
Plus - using the Harris Benedict etc you can multiply BMR by 1.2 for sedentry, 1.375 for light/moderate exercise 3 times a week and so on to find TDEE.
But: If my BMR gives 1750 cals/day. Then, spending almost everyday studying/desk-jobing for most of the day, my TDEE would be around 2100 (1750 x 1.2).
However, I do Gym 3 days a week, and minimum 20 mins of moderate cardio every "off-day" [4 days a week].
So, if I only count cardio as "light exercise", would that make my TDEE 1750 x 1.375 = 2400/day?
OR
Would TDEE be 2100 + plus (say 250 calories burnt doing cardio that day) = 2350
Why is TDEE higher if you multiply BMR using the 1.2/1.375 etc - is this showing the "metabolic effect" of exercise?
I am 6ft (186cms), 180lbs (82kgs), around 19-20% BF (LBM = 145lbs approx)
Thanks for your time - this will probably show how stupid I am...
Best regards.