- Joined
- Jul 23, 2005
- Messages
- 11,812
- Reaction score
- 213
- Points
- 63
- Age
- 46
When I first moved into my 2 roommate's place, they had this debate going on. Who would win in a fight between a man and a wolf. Both were on opposite ends. Many, many elements came up. So I am graduating this topic to IM, because when you think about this, its a simple subject made complicated.
First off, its 1 vs 1. The man has no partners, the wolf has no pack.
No weapons.
It is to the death. No escaping.
It is in a safe environment. The climate nor surroundings have NO influence of the fight.
Points that came up during our discussion:
-Panic. "The man would prolly panic." Not necessarily. Its an average man, not a sick one. This man is not dumb, but not a genius. He knows going in, its either him or the wolf. He knows he must fight or die. The wolf wont panic. It relies on instinct and andrenaline. The man has adrenaline too, only the difference is intelligence.
-Weapons. "The man cant win without a knife" Why? The wolf will bite and grab and pull and tear, but thats it. Once the wolf's jaw is in use, its taken up. The man has more natural weapons thanks to his thumbs and elbow flexion. Also, wolves hunt in packs. How good are they alone?
-Agility. "The wolf will grab the neck." True. However this man isnt dumb and knows he can die. Its safe to say he knows how he can die and defend against it. But the wolf is more agile and will probably know how to get the neck better than the man can defend it naturally. With the man's more natural weapons, he could defend and grab the wolf's neck. Not to mention, a man can fight off his back.
-Size. This is a tricky one. Looking up the average size of a wolf came up around a ~120lb mark. Finding an average man put his slightly heavier. As far as muscle type and placement goes, no one knows.
-Killing Instinct. Wolf has the advantage here. However, with the given circumstances, does it matter since were this far?
I brought this up in classrooms and what I found that people that didnt even give it a moment's thought said "Wolf." Whereas people who took a moment and thought about it, they said "Man."
Vote your answer and explain why if it hasnt already been detailed.
First off, its 1 vs 1. The man has no partners, the wolf has no pack.
No weapons.
It is to the death. No escaping.
It is in a safe environment. The climate nor surroundings have NO influence of the fight.
Points that came up during our discussion:
-Panic. "The man would prolly panic." Not necessarily. Its an average man, not a sick one. This man is not dumb, but not a genius. He knows going in, its either him or the wolf. He knows he must fight or die. The wolf wont panic. It relies on instinct and andrenaline. The man has adrenaline too, only the difference is intelligence.
-Weapons. "The man cant win without a knife" Why? The wolf will bite and grab and pull and tear, but thats it. Once the wolf's jaw is in use, its taken up. The man has more natural weapons thanks to his thumbs and elbow flexion. Also, wolves hunt in packs. How good are they alone?
-Agility. "The wolf will grab the neck." True. However this man isnt dumb and knows he can die. Its safe to say he knows how he can die and defend against it. But the wolf is more agile and will probably know how to get the neck better than the man can defend it naturally. With the man's more natural weapons, he could defend and grab the wolf's neck. Not to mention, a man can fight off his back.
-Size. This is a tricky one. Looking up the average size of a wolf came up around a ~120lb mark. Finding an average man put his slightly heavier. As far as muscle type and placement goes, no one knows.
-Killing Instinct. Wolf has the advantage here. However, with the given circumstances, does it matter since were this far?
I brought this up in classrooms and what I found that people that didnt even give it a moment's thought said "Wolf." Whereas people who took a moment and thought about it, they said "Man."
Vote your answer and explain why if it hasnt already been detailed.


