• Hello, this board in now turned off and no new posting.
    Please REGISTER at Anabolic Steroid Forums, and become a member of our NEW community!
  • Check Out IronMag Labs® KSM-66 Max - Recovery and Anabolic Growth Complex

Avengers

who was that red faced guy at the final scene after the credits? hellboy???

Thanos.

thanos11.jpg


Comic book spoiler: he once killed half of everyone in existence.
 
Damn it would be EPIC if they made a part 2 with him as the bad guy. Thanos is a BEAST :teeth:
 
does anybody know why edward norton is not playing the hulk?

Following Marvel Studios' president confirming Edward Norton not being involved in the upcoming "Avengers" movie and the actor's agent responding in a heavy statement, the man of the moment has released a high road statement on his FaceBook page involving the dispute.

As most of you know, I don't like to talk much about the business of making movies because it means a lot to me to protect the audience's fullest enjoyment of the 'magic' that films can have. But I am so appreciative of the outpouring of support from fans of the Hulk and the Avengers that I feel it would be rude not to respond. So here goes: It seems it won't work out for me to continue playing Bruce Banner for Marvel in "The Avengers." I sincerely hoped it could happen and be great for everyone but it hasn't turned out as we all hoped. I know this is disappointing to many people and that makes me sad. But I am very sincerely grateful to Marvel for extending the offer and even more so for giving me the chance to be a part of the Hulk's long and excellent history. And I really can't thank the fans enough for how much enthusiasm you've sent me way about what Louis and I tried to do in our turn with the legend. It means a lot to me. I grew up with Banner and Hulk and have been a fan of every incarnation. I'm really proud, and very blessed, to have been one of them and will be thrilled to see him live on through other actors. Hulk is bigger than all of us, that's why we love him, right?

Sincerely,
Edward Norton

More @ Edward Norton Adresses The Avengers Dispute

Edward Norton isn't the Incredible Hulk anymore. An official statement released by Marvel President of Production Kevin Feige has revealed Norton, who played Bruce Banner in the most recent Hulk film and a priest in that romantic comedy with Jenna Elfman, will be replaced by another actor, saying:

"We have made the decision to not bring Ed Norton back to portray the title role of Bruce Banner in the Avengers. Our decision is definitely not one based on monetary factors, but instead rooted in the need for an actor who embodies the creativity and collaborative spirit of our other talented cast members. The Avengers demands players who thrive working as part of an ensemble, as evidenced by Robert, Chris H, Chris E, Sam, Scarlett, and all of our talented casts. We are looking to announce a name actor who fulfills these requirements, and is passionate about the iconic role in the coming weeks."


But that's not it, guys, because Ed Norton's agent is not the kind of guy who's going to sit idly by while his client is libeled with claims of not embodying the creative and collaborative spirit of our other talented cast members. No one goes around saying Ed Norton doesn't embody the creative and collaborative spirit of our other talented cast members on his watch. So he released this lengthy statement to HitFix:

This offensive statement from Kevin Feige at Marvel is a purposefully misleading, inappropriate attempt to paint our client in a negative light. Here are the facts: two months ago, Kevin called me and said he wanted Edward to reprise the role of Bruce Banner in The Avengers. He told me it would be his fantasy to bring Edward on stage with the rest of the cast at ComiCon and make it the event of the convention. When I said that Edward was definitely open to this idea, Kevin was very excited and we agreed that Edward should meet with Joss Whedon to discuss the project.

Edward and Joss had a very good meeting (confirmed by Feige to me) at which Edward said he was enthusiastic at the prospect of being a part of the ensemble cast. Marvel subsequently made him a financial offer to be in the film and both sides started negotiating in good faith. This past Wednesday, after several weeks of civil, uncontentious discussions, but before we had come to terms on a deal, a representative from Marvel called to say they had decided to go in another direction with the part. This seemed to us to be a financial decision but, whatever the case, it is completely their prerogative, and we accepted their decision with no hard feelings.

We know a lot of fans have voiced their public disappointment with this result, but this is no excuse for Feige's mean spirited, accusatory comments. Counter to what Kevin implies here, Edward was looking forward to the opportunity to work with Joss and the other actors in the Avengers cast, many of whom are personal friends of his. Feige's statement is unprofessional, disingenuous and clearly defamatory. Mr. Norton's talent, tireless work ethic and professional integrity deserve more respect, and so do Marvel's fans.


More @ Ed Norton Not in 'Avengers', Marvel Says It's Not Money, Rep Claims It's Totally About Money | I Watch Stuff
 
Last edited:
I agree, when you have a job like this you are going to expect something to be wrong.
 
Damn that was a good movie! Now they need to either introduce Thanos in "Thor 2" or use him as the main villain in part 2 of "The Avengers" :buttrock:
 
Great film, the rag doll part was my personal favorite.
 
Definitely a kick ass movie and one of my favourite super hero ones now. I thought that NYC got wrecked to shit from the aliens but it doesn't sound like the damage was all that bad:


Avengers' Manhattan Damage: $160 Billion


The Avengers picked up the superhero trope of massive destruction (and very little visible human injury or death) with its extensive final battle in the streets of Manhattan. But how much damage was actually done to our great city?

The Hollywood Reporter actually commissioned a report from Kinetic Analysis Corp., a real-life firm that specializes in "disaster-cost prediction and assessment."

Computer models determined that the physical damage of the Chitauri invasion would be between $60 billion and $70 billion. Add in "economic and cleanup costs" of $90 billion and "the loss of thousands of lives" and you've got a bill of $160 billion, give or take. Um, does Odin the All-Father still cover his sons' expenses?

"For context, the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks cost $83 billion, Hurricane Katrina cost $90 billion, and the tsunami in Japan last year washed away $122 billion," says THR, while adding, "KAC also predicts that liability would be a major issue. Who, exactly, will have to pay for the damage? S.H.I.E.L.D., they note, is likely protected as a government agency, though probes eventually will look into its role in predicting, preventing and responding to the invasion … Given the involvement of individuals considered deities in some cultures (Thor, Loki), there is even the potential to classify the event as an 'act of God,' though that designation would be subject to strenuous theological and legal debate."

Click through for the full report -- which is a lot of fun and also mentions the Ghostbusters and Mechagodzilla -- and includes my favorite bit: "There was considerable collateral damage of questionable necessity by at least one of the S.H.I.E.L.D. operatives (Hulk)."

Avengers' Manhattan Damage: $160 Billion - IGN
 
I saw it twice last weekend! It was great! Wish DC would get their shit together and do a Justice League.
 
Just finished this movie tonight and all I have to say is Wow. Best movie I've seen in a loooooooooong time. Definitly worth it. It's "don't-have-to-bribe-your-girlfriend-with-a-chick-flick" good.
 

Hero Complex: I spoke to Jerry Robinson once and I congratulated him on the billion-dollar success of “The Dark Knight” and he winced like I had poked him in the eye. Of course I instantly realized that watching Alfred, the Joker, Two-Face, etc. fill the coffers of Warner Bros. was like watching a son raised in another house with another family’s name. I don’t know the arrangements on this film, but has this project and its success been a mixed experience in any way?

Jim Starlin: Very mixed. It’s nice to see my work recognized as being worth something beyond the printed page, and it was very cool seeing Thanos up on the big screen. Joss Whedon and his crew did an excellent job on “The Avengers” movie and I look forward to the sequel, for obvious reasons. But this is the second film that had something I created for Marvel in it — the Infinity Gauntlet in “Thor” being the other – and both films I had to pay for my own ticket to see them. Financial compensation to the creators of these characters doesn’t appear to be part of the equation. Hopefully Thanos’ walk-on in “The Avengers” will give a boost to a number of my own properties that are in various stages of development for film: “Dreadstar,” “Breed” and the novel “Thinning the Predators.”


That absolutely blows.
 
I saw it twice last weekend! It was great! Wish DC would get their shit together and do a Justice League.

DC got Batman right. Hopefully, this new Superman will go well.

Saw the Captain America movie twice, but Avengers only once so far.
 
Wouldn't mind seeing Avengers 2 with the new Spidey and Hugh Jackman as Wolverine. I would much rather see Infinity Gauntlet or Civil War represented in the sequel, though.
 
Thanos.

thanos11.jpg


Comic book spoiler: he once killed half of everyone in existence.

Created by Jim Starlin. That comics creator was recently quoted in a film mag interview saying he had to pay to see Avengers while his character appeared on the big screen if only momentarily. Starlin didn't get a dime for the use of his character. He also said the Infinity gauntlet (another of his creations) appeared in Thor. Again, Starlin didn't get a dime and had to pay to see the movie! lol Nice job, Marvel.
 

Attachments

  • infinity-gauntlet2.jpg
    infinity-gauntlet2.jpg
    63.2 KB · Views: 3
Back
Top