Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Vlar said:i need to call my mom
good article![]()
In training, the only thing that matters is the result. It doesn't matter what used to happen, what you think should happen, what a textbook tells you is happening, what the experts say, or what a bunch of borderline-retarded pencildicks on a forum post about.
26. Training a body part once a week is dumb. The body responds better to frequent exposure. You don't eat once a week, take all your supplements once a week, or train your heart (cardio) once a week, so why treat the rest of your body any different?
KelJu said:I have been seeing this a lot lately and I want to know you guy's opinion on it.
shiznit2169 said:Your body works in movements .. therefore you train movements such as the upper/lower split or a push/pull/leg split and so forth.
Training a muscle once a week is a waste of time. Wish i knew this a long time ago.
If you train lower body twice a week, unloading the spine in the second workout and doing dumbbell step-ups, split squats, glute-ham raises, etc. will make a big difference to your overall strength and recovery.
Training a body part once a week is dumb. The body responds better to frequent exposure. You don't eat once a week, take all your supplements once a week, or train your heart (cardio) once a week, so why treat the rest of your body any different?
Be real. It doesn't matter what people think of you. What matters is what you think of you. Of course, if I don't think much of you, you can pretty much take it to the bank.
DOMS said:Could someone clarify the following for me?
What does Cosgrove mean by "unloading the spine?"
Dale Mabry said:Lliterally you never unload the spine, you just don't directly load it. Ie., when a weight is on your back, your spine is loaded, when you have a weight down at your sides, it is not directly loaded, so it is considered unloaded.
Go it. Thanks.Dale Mabry said:No. The weight is not directly on the back. So you can squat with the weight on your back (loaded) or with DBs at your side (Unloaded). You can also lunge loaded (Bar on back) or unloaded (DBs at side).
shiznit2169 said:Your body works in movements .. therefore you train movements such as the upper/lower split or a push/pull/leg split and so forth.
Training a muscle once a week is a waste of time. Wish i knew this a long time ago.
KelJu said:Correct me if I am wrong, but isn't a push/pull/legs split such as the following
still only work a muscle once a week?
Mon: push
wed: pull
Fri: Leg
For example, the only time you are hitting your chest is on Mondays.
KelJu said:Correct me if I am wrong, but isn't a push/pull/legs split such as the following
still only work a muscle once a week?
Mon: push
wed: pull
Fri: Leg
For example, the only time you are hitting your chest is on Mondays.
KelJu bro welcome to IMKelJu said:Well what are the vet's opinion about the comment of training once a week? I was all about training a body part 3 times a week until I joined this board. Now, after some fantastic fucking gains working body parts only once a week I have reached the conclusion that working a body part once a week is not only not a waste of time, but can be a great idea.
But, I haven't heard anyone comment on this yet.
I also read the same comment in another post about thoughts by Matt Reynolds or some shit like that.
CowPimp said:No. Your chest is used to adduct and extend the shoulders, as in a pull-up or a chin-up respectively. Your chest is also used to stabilize the bar while it is sitting on your back during a back squat.
Dale Mabry said:As a prime mover only on monday, though.
fUnc17 said:It's just saying you can't completely isolate a muscle. It's the wrong terminology to use. You can't say your doing chest today when it assists in other movements such as squats and pullups. It's a matter of words, not what your doing.
KelJu said:Ok yeah I see what all you guys are saying, and yes my terminology has something to be desired. Hell, I just got it through my head this week what you guys have been meaning about training movements, not parts. And I see the point is that you really can't just train a part, but you can train a movement.
So you work the muscle, but you train for the movement.
But, you are only directly targeting your pecs when you are training on a push day. I am assuming that the comment about once per week is a waste of time is saying that one push per week is a waste of time. would you agree with this assumption? And what is your opinion on it, because personally I think that idea sucks.
KelJu said:Ok yeah I see what all you guys are saying, and yes my terminology has something to be desired. Hell, I just got it through my head this week what you guys have been meaning about training movements, not parts. And I see the point is that you really can't just train a part, but you can train a movement.
So you work the muscle, but you train for the movement.
But, you are only directly targeting your pecs when you are training on a push day. I am assuming that the comment about once per week is a waste of time is saying that one push per week is a waste of time. would you agree with this assumption? And what is your opinion on it, because personally I think that idea sucks.
camarosuper6 said:Upping my frequency and gradually training to failure over time has been a Godsend to my training and physique.
Not only that, but I was completely suprised in how much better overall condition this allowed me to become.
camarosuper6 said:Upping my frequency and gradually training to failure over time has been a Godsend to my training and physique.
Not only that, but I was completely suprised in how much better overall condition this allowed me to become.