Dealing with banned members/account recreators: What's your opinion?

[Little Wing]

anyone who argues with Built should be banned in addition to the natural consequences ignoring her advice will lead to.

 

[Curt James]

all anyone has to do is look at your posts to know who you are.

it's back.

It's gone.

Hat's off to CT.

CJ, Mr. Terminator, help us! Get rid of these..trolls!

lulz

I kinda side with Mr. Chob on the "there are no trolls, just people with unpopular opinions" concept of trolls.

But share some (a fraction) of LW's discontent.

HELL HATH NO FURY LIKE LITTLE WING ANNOYED!

anyone who argues with Built should be banned in addition to the natural consequences ignoring her advice will lead to.

This!

See my sig! Built Or click the image! ---->

Curt you are amazing. Thank you for working so hard on keeping things under control and all of our valued members happy.

Pretty sure I ticked some members off simply asking the question. lol Hey, win some and lose some. Thanks, Gena.

 

[Warlord!]

Interesting.

???

Who is that? There is nothing tough about him.

 

[Curt James]

Results so far...

Should obvious trolls receive an "automatic ban"?

Yes: 28 ??? 65.12%
No: 7 ??? 16.28%
Maybe: 6 ??? 16.28%
Other: 1 ??? 2.33%
Voters: 43

 

[REDDOG309]

Interesting.

 

[DaMayor]

 

[Curt James]

(snip)

 

[Little Wing]

It's gone.

Hat's off to CT.



lulz

I kinda side with Mr. Chob on the "there are no trolls, just people with unpopular opinions" concept of trolls.

But share some (a fraction) of LW's discontent.

HELL HATH NO FURY LIKE LITTLE WING ANNOYED!



This!

See my sig! Built Or click the image! ---->



Pretty sure I ticked some members off simply asking the question. lol Hey, win some and lose some. Thanks, Gena.

i second Gena's thank you. and acknowledge the fact that i can be an over zealous asshole when annoyed i usually put it this way... i am aware i sometimes have the tendency to kill ants with army tanks. he was a very annoying ant.

 

[AdmiralRichard]

. . . followed by having their head shaved, tanned and oiled, with a trendy goatee hand-drawn on their chin. Gears confiscated and replaced by a bicycle and chased by a hoard of knife-wielding Mexicans

he must live near that doms chick

 

[AdmiralRichard]

wow. If youre this fukkin pissed... youre old!

 

[Little Wing]

point illustrated. all you have to do is click on see more posts by a user to get a general idea what they add to the board. all yours has is dumb ass comments and coffee smilies. you don't even converse.

 

[Kathybird]

ok but hold on a minute.... it might take me a while to make 99 more accounts.

I'm up to 67.....

Thanks for the vote of confidence, but I would make a terrible mod. Let one of my psychotic rage mood swings take me over, and half of IM gets banned in one day.

That might be fun.

Example discussion:

roidman "This thread is awesome"
skippypb "yes, yes it is. I love this thread"
harpygonads "Hey guys! I see 2 fluffy bunnies out my window - I want to catch then and shove them up my ass!
roidman "That's awesome dude. Everyone is awesome"
skippypb "Let's all be awesome together and have sex with bunnies - and each other"
trollboy2kmax "ROID EAT MY SHIT MOTHERHUMPER, JOO E4T DOGTURD SANDWICHES!
roidman "Just Leave, doucheberry"
trollboy2kmax "ALL YOU CAN SUCK IT HAHAHA - YOUR MOMSES ARS IN MY BASEMENT HAHAHA... ROID, YOUR MOMSA DOUCHEBARYY HAHAHAHA!
(this goes on and on and on and on...)
me "This thread sucks now. I like sex with bunnies."

GOATS. The thread was about sex with GOATS. Really.

anyone who argues with Built should be banned in addition to the natural consequences ignoring her advice will lead to.

Yes.




Seriously, I was a maybe vote. Can I change it to ban them?


... wait. Does that mean I'm getting banned?

 

[AdmiralRichard]

point illustrated. all you have to do is click on see more posts by a user to get a general idea what they add to the board. all yours has is dumb ass comments and coffee smilies. you don't even converse.

 

[Curt James]

Results so far...

Should obvious trolls receive an "automatic ban"?

Yes: 30 ??? 65.22%
No: 7 ??? 15.22%
Maybe: 8 ??? 17.39%
Other: 1 ??? 2.17%
Voters: 46

Three additional votes.

 

[Curt James]

i second Gena's thank you. and (snip) i am aware i sometimes have the tendency to kill ants with army tanks.

You're a ray of sunshine.

And I'm glad I saw your post and MDR's comment as well. I wield the ban hammer without guilt.

 

[Little Wing]

if my coffee tastes funny you're gonna get it.

 

[Chubby]

I think grounds for bannishment should be as follows:

 Anyone under 15% bodyfat should be banned.
 Thos woo kent spel r uze txt lingo shud be binnd.
 Anyone who asks a generic, non-commonsensical question without doing a search first should be banned...from the internet.
 Newbies who argue dietetic science with Built, or other well-informed mods or fitness vets should be banned...and forced to eat gay-arsed oatmeal fruit smoothies for the rest of their days.
 Anyone who initiates a thread involving politics, religion, abortion, capital punishment, gay rights, or other no-win arguments.
 Guys who, after bragging about their illicit steroid use, post images of their 12??? biceps.
 Those who end their post(s) with ???GICH???
 AlBob, FMJ, and Juggernaut.

I wouldn't call it argue. I think it is called 'debate'. Because when two people debate about any topic, they do it because both parties disagree with each other,not because they dislike each other. Who ever presents her/his case with fact and logic wins the debate. And whoever doesn't win will learn something new. Friendly debate will benifit both participants and those follow it. It should be encouraged not discouraged.
Sorry, if I went off topic.

 

[MDR]

You're a ray of sunshine.

And I'm glad I saw your post and MDR's comment as well. I wield the ban hammer without guilt.

You da man, Curt-you da man!

 

[XYZ]

anyone who argues with Built should be banned in addition to the natural consequences ignoring her advice will lead to.

I guess I should be banned then?

 

[DaMayor]

I guess I should be banned then?

Absolutely.





Who are you?

 

[ihateschoolmt]

^ ya seriously, who are all these mods that I never see post? I guess they mod the anabolic section?

 

[jagbender]

What about new members need to be a member for lets say 1 or 2 months to be able to enter anything goes or open chat, 50 posts is too easy to achieve.

Indeed the trolls go and post the same crap "welcome" 50 times and they are in again.

ban them!

 

[XYZ]

Absolutely.





Who are you?

I totally agree and nobody important.

 

[XYZ]

^ ya seriously, who are all these mods that I never see post? I guess they mod the anabolic section?

That's funny, I was wondering to myself "who the hell is this ihateschool person" asking questions? I suppose you don't get over to the AAS section much?

 

[jagbender]

I think complainers should be negged, banned, tarred and feathered. Then subjected to sodomy with broomsticks lubricated with Icy-Hot.

That is too nice LOL

 

[ihateschoolmt]

That's funny, I was wondering to myself "who the hell is this ihateschool person" asking questions? I suppose you don't get over to the AAS section much?

Lol it's like it's two different forums. I have never read a thread in that section and I think a lot of people only post/read in there.

 

[XYZ]

You should stop in sometimes, the BS stories are to die for and the posts involving wife swapping is very comical to say the least.

 

[Little Wing]

I guess I should be banned then?

 

[XYZ]

Don't be. It's all good. Healthy debate is a good thing.

 

[DaMayor]

Don't be. It's all good. Healthy debate is a good thing.

You're still here?

That's it.....I'm calling Curt James.

ya seriously, who are all these mods that I never see post? I guess they mod the anabolic section?

Rob has different Moderator identities to match his multiple personalities.