Dear African Americans

[DOMS]

the constitution was made to be changed, take a second and think of the intentions of the document. it was never meant to be set in stone, hence the ability to amend it.

consider the 2nd and 3rd amendment, this was a direct result of British abuse of power, and were major factors in the success of the revolution. do you worry about quartering of soldiers in private houses during peace time? where is the organization protecting that? our reasoning for bearing arms is completely different from the original intentions. we do not need them to keep america free, they did. but reason rarely counts in these arguments. as for commenting iq, that is laughable.

live in fear of the government, and ignore its track record, sure seems like i am the one in denial. i mean its not like i provided examples, paranoid rantings are much more effective.

The point is that we would always have the right to be free of government tyranny. It, like the assemblage design of the government, is a part of the check and balances.

Look at the UK for the way things will go if you let them.

But yes, let's put ourselves at the tender mercies of politicians. The most trusted of professions.

But yeah, I guess you do have a better understanding of government and rights that the Founding Fathers did. It must be great to be you.

 

[DOMS]

I live/grew up in the south, with hateful/ignorant people on both sides who lump people into groups/categories. Wouldn't you think that in my "magical land" (where it was once common for people to own slaves) that if people were talking about reparations that we would be the first to know...?

There are also plenty of white organizations/individuals who talk/complain about other races. So what? Who cares? It's time to move on...

I agree, we should move on. Unfortunately, there appears to be an inexperienced racist socialist black president in the way.

Fine, maybe it won't come up, but I won't be surprised if it does.

 

[nni]

The point is that we would always have the right to be free of government tyranny. It, like the assemblage design of the government, is a part of the check and balances.

Look at the UK for the way things will go if you let them.

But yes, let's put ourselves at the tender mercies of politicians. The most trusted of professions.

But yeah, I guess you do have a better understanding of government and rights that the Founding Fathers did. It must be great to be you.

your reading comprehension is horrible. nothing you said had anything to do with what i said. my fault or trying to reason with you. i wont try again.

 

[PreMier]

your reading comprehension is horrible. nothing you said had anything to do with what i said. my fault or trying to reason with you. i wont try again.

see below

our reasoning for bearing arms is completely different from the original intentions. we do not need them to keep america free, they did. but reason rarely counts in these arguments.

The point is that we would always have the right to be free of government tyranny. It, like the assemblage design of the government, is a part of the check and balances.

i agree with this.. i understood the 2nd amendment as the right to bear arms to keep us free. whether it be from the redcoats or the us government

 

[DOMS]

your reading comprehension is horrible. nothing you said had anything to do with what i said. my fault or trying to reason with you. i wont try again.

Pot, meet kettle.

I addressed the continued need for the people to continue to be able to defend themselves.

But that's fine, your reasoning of "Nothing bad has happened so far!" precludes any real conversation anyway.

 

[bio-chem]

which is exactly why gun owners shouldnt be so worried.

It was only untill recently with the Supreme Courts latest rulling that gun ownership was determined to be an individual citizens right. and while a total gun ban can not now be had. the ruling did allow for limitations. gun owners have every right to be afraid if they feel that it is there right to keep a loaded hand gun in their own home.

 

[The Monkey Man]

It was only untill recently with the Supreme Courts latest rulling that gun ownership was determined to be an individual citizens right. and while a total gun ban can not now be had. the ruling did allow for limitations. gun owners have every right to be afraid if they feel that it is there right to keep a loaded hand gun in their own home.

As if I was going to shoot an intruder or criminal in my home,
without having a reason to link a criminal non-registered weapon to that
criminal's possesion.

 

[bio-chem]

As if I was going to shoot an intruder or criminal in my home,
without having a reason to link a criminal non-registered weapon to that
criminal's possesion.

you mean by placing one in his hand moments after he bleeds out and just before you call the police?

LOL

 

[The Monkey Man]

you mean by placing one in his hand moments after he bleeds out and just before you call the police?

LOL

OMG NO...
That would be illegal

Besides that doesn't even approach the idea that I could shoot another human being.
Thats just wrong even if he was a "piece a' shit' criminal...

 

[bio-chem]

OMG NO...
That would be illegal

are you sure?

 

[The Monkey Man]

couldn't find the Johnny Dangerously clip

 

[The Monkey Man]

I couldn't include the Johnny Dangerously vid

 

[DOMS]

YouTube Video

 

[The Monkey Man]

I was talking about the part where she said
the son of "Killer Kelly" didn't grow up to be a piece of shit criminal.

 

[mcguin]

which is exactly why gun owners shouldnt be so worried.

DC gun ban...Biden and Obama are among the most crazies of the crazy...

 

[The Monkey Man]

DC gun ban...Biden and Obama are among the most crazies of the crazy...

Dude, there is a 2nd amendment...

They can't change that... Ever!


Farmers w/guns freed this country and NO ONE can ever forget that.

 

[Nate K]

You must live in a magical land.

I spent most of my life in LA (not a magical land) and heard plenty of blacks talking about it there. There are also plenty of black organizations and individuals that talk about it.

Constantly negative? About an inexperienced racist socialist black president? It makes sense.

Derr uh LA is about the only place you would hear that.

nevermind i see you said we should move on.

 

[DOMS]

Derr

Well said.

uh LA is about the only place you would hear that.

nevermind i see you said we should move on.

The Nation of Islam is based in Chicago and Jesse Jackson lives in South Carolina.

 

[Arnold]

Well...except that blacks will expect Obama to give them their reparations for slavery...which ended almost two centuries ago.

actually it would only be 143 years, that is 57 years short or being two centuries.

 

[Arnold]

Constantly negative? About an inexperienced racist socialist black president? It makes sense.

you are calling someone else a racist?

what does him being black (actually half black) have to do with anything?

 

[Arnold]

you are calling some else a racist?

what does him being black (actually half black) have to do with anything?

if Obama is a socialist does that make bush a dictator?

 

[DOMS]

you are calling someone else a racist?

what does him being black (actually half black) have to do with anything?

Far be it from me to deny someone the joy of being racist, but the idea of a racist black president of the country that I live in bothers me.

Yeah...I know, he's half black. That's why all the news agencies and black people tout that he's the nations first "African American" president. Which is their way of saying that he's black.

It's not just that he's black, it's that he hired from the Nation of Islam (an organization who's leaders openly talked about killing whites), had a whitey hatting preacher for 20 years, and referred to his racist mother-in-law as a "typical white person."

 

[DOMS]

if Obama is a socialist does that make bush a dictator?

You're replying to yourself? Yeah, it's my bedtime, too.

Bush didn't have enough control to be a dictator. He was only an asshat. I will not miss him.

You should be more worried about the unchecked government that Obama will be running.

Remember, he's for redistribution of wealth with his sights set on the middle class. In other words, he's going to rob from the Prince and give to the poor.

Plus, he's very soft on the border issue, so you can expect to see more chewies in Colorado (and the rest of the US).

 

[danzik17]

He can't be much softer than Bush on border control who did nothing.

 

[DOMS]

He can't be much softer than Bush on border control who did nothing.

Yes he can.

It's my understanding that Obama has plans to naturalize the messicans that are already here. Which is bad enough, but what do you think that'll do the flood?

 

[Arnold]

Far be it from me to deny someone the joy of being racist, but the idea of a racist black president of the country that I live in bothers me.

Bush is a racist, not to mention stupid, so not sure I see your point.

 

[The Monkey Man]

you are calling some else a racist?

what does him being black (actually half black) have to do with anything?

No shit!... If there are loser moves to be had they will come from the political funding arena, not "the black community"

 

[maniclion]

Yes he can.

It's my understanding that Obama has plans to naturalize the messicans that are already here. Which is bad enough, but what do you think that'll do the flood?

Wasn't McCain the co-author of the bill to give amnesty to them? Remember the McKennedy Bill?

 

[tallcall]

I don't think he's got a shot of banning guns (but he will push for the AWB again), but he will still try and impose laws that only prevent hobbyist and law abiding citizens from enjoying firearms.

Damn, and I was really looking forward to obtaining that M2 I've been eyeing. True story.

 

[DOMS]

Bush is a racist, not to mention stupid, so not sure I see your point.

They happen to be racist against different people.

I couldn't help but notice that you glossed over the rest of my post. A little painful was it?