Yes, I've heard it all before. I'm not big, so what can I know? Well, besides the fact that I don't train for size, I haven't been lifting consistently that long. A little under 3 years. I think decreasing my body fat percentage and adding 35 pounds to my frame in that time without hypertrophy being my goal is pretty good.
Beyond that, a year or more of that time I have been intentionally maintaining my weight, such as I am right now. I have a very fast metabolism because I exercise almost daily and have a physically active life and job. I'm throwing down around 4K a day just to maintain my weight while trying to goto school, work, and help support my family because we have had some seriously fucked up occurences lately financially. If I had more disposable income I would be bigger than I am now. Nonetheless, I don't plan on getting all that much bigger because I have NO desire to have 21 inch arms. That doesn't even look appealing to me. I would rather have 16 inch arms, deadlift triple my bodyweight, and be able to outrun 99% of the population in a 40 yard dash.
So does all of this mean I don't know how to do it? No, it doesn't. I just means that one, I'm not a bodybuilder, and two, even if I were it is not feasible at this time.
Furthermore, I have no problem with Ironman's program. I never said it wasn't effective; I've never really commented on it at all. I never said isolation work on your arms is worthless; I have said quite the opposite. I've said it isn't needed, and I've said that people generally do too much, but I have also said that intelligently implemented arm work is a great asset to a bodybuilder's program.
All I said was that it's bullshit that his arms shrunk an inch in 6 months because he stopped doing isolation work on them, and I still think that's the case. Straight horseshit in my opinion. If you choose to believe that drivel, then continue sucking Ironman's dick all you want. I don't care.