• Hello, this board in now turned off and no new posting.
    Please REGISTER at Anabolic Steroid Forums, and become a member of our NEW community!
  • Check Out IronMag Labs® KSM-66 Max - Recovery and Anabolic Growth Complex

eq

jimm

jimm

Registered
Joined
Dec 20, 2010
Messages
2,408
Reaction score
222
Points
0
Location
UK
Im about to start a test prop and anadrol cycle.. was just wondering what you guys think about throwing eq in the mix?

iv got access to eq but wasnt planning on putting it in the cycle but might do...

what does eq bring to the table?


so far i hear its good for increasing appitite wich is always good but in terms of building muscle im not sure what do you guys think? should i just run the prop/drol and see how my body reacts to drol or throw sum eq in aswell? or keep the eq for a different cycle...
 
Pittsburgh63 said:
What are your stats bro? .. plus eq should be run for at least 15wks.. you probably aren't planning to pin your prop that long.
Click to expand...

^^^ This!

And by week 8 you should be feeling like at pin cushion.

So short answer, save it for another time.
 
I loveeeeeeeeeeee EQ................I like 16 weeks min with that one tho bro
 
So pretty much ain't gonna bother my self with the eq. Just prop/drol.

Sorry I always forget to put my stats up..

I'm 5'7
23
185lb (last time I checked any way..)

Iv been training for 3 years.

That's me in my pic
 
EQ was pretty good. Just have to run it for a LONG time. I would agree with 16 weeks or even longer. My minimum dose for me would be 900mg. It's just so mild that I feel like a lot of it is needed to get results. But the endurance on EQ is crazy!
 
Wish EQ worked sooner cause the good sides would be amazing. My rat has way too much in storage that will most likely be tossed because of non-use. Dumb rat.
 
You would have to run EQ for a minimum of 12 weeks it is a slow acting ester, for me i didnt see great results for bulking.
 
Can you guys comment on since it is such a slow-acting ester then why bother? I used to use it but had not for a long time and switched over to Tren (my favorite). I decided to go back to my roots for current cycle and am on test and EQ but not thrilled with the feel of it. What is the benefit of running something a long time to get results when you can get quicker and more dramatic results with something else and run shorter?
 
Bulking cycles are usually longer lasting cycles combining long esters. This allows you to pin less frequently. Some people stay on very long cycles with doses on the lower side. Some do blast and cruise and blast again. These long cycles are well suited for eq if that is a compound that does well for the person.
 
Muscle Gelz Transdermals
IronMag Labs Prohormones
i run EQ because its harder to aromatize, when i run it its useually for a long time, so its a little safer then lets say tren, i think EQ does wonders at getting ya strong and cut so nice, i think some guys fail to stack it with other things and run it solo then say it sucks, i stack it with other compounds and when all is said and done, i never have a bloaded look, it compliments test i think, i can only speak on my behalf, so my vote would be yes, run it when bulking, and cutting, its a real good drug.
 
gonna run the eq on my next one probly test 400 and eq with some dbol sounds pretty tasty to me..

laters...
 
JCBourne said:
Wish EQ worked sooner cause the good sides would be amazing. My rat has way too much in storage that will most likely be tossed because of non-use. Dumb rat.
Click to expand...

What are the good sides from EQ. I'm curios.
 
Endurance was the thing i enjoyed most about EQ. If I was training as an athlete, I would be taking a bunch of EQ.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top