• Hello, this board in now turned off and no new posting.
    Please REGISTER at Anabolic Steroid Forums, and become a member of our NEW community!
  • Check Out IronMag Labs® KSM-66 Max - Recovery and Anabolic Growth Complex

importance of negatives

How important are negatives?

  • It's all about how much you can lift, not lower

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    6

nismo80

Registered
Joined
Sep 23, 2007
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Age
45
are eccentric lifts best as a certain workout, or just a variation of a lift, or important to focus on every rep?

I have to think that only ever focusing on the push part of say Bench Press, you're missing out on strength and possible size by skipping the negatives.

How far should one go? Leave your ego at the door and start all over: reduce the weight and focus on the lowering while also pressing....

or do it on a separate day. Have spotters to lift it for you and focus on the negative, keeping it as a negative only exercise.

Or does all this depend on your goals?
 
the theoretical basis of why negative exercise is so beneficial (and so demanding) was basically developed by Arthur Jones. I integrate negative only or negative accentuated exercise into my client routines frequently and it is clearly the most efficient (time in, results out) exercise that can be performed.

It also creates a lot of physical trauma to the tendons and muscles, so should be a part of an EXTREMELY low volume routine when applying it exclusively.
 
don't have enough time to reply fully to this thread right now.

clif notes version.....negatives have some very good application. don't overlook them!
 
DD or funk: Would it be extremely beneficial to throw in a negative only/negative focus workout once in a while?

I definitely do focus on the negative in normal lifts more than the average lifter does, but would it be beneficial to say go very heavy one day with a spotter, maybe close to your 1 or 2RM, and just do excruciatingly slow negatives while getting spotted on the concentric?

I know that you can support more weight on the eccentric than the concentric, which is why I figured go very heavy with a spotter.

Would love to give that a try - would be a nice change from my normal superset workouts.
 
Especially on my pulling days I abuse eccentrics - when I can't do a single more pullup with full ROM, I pull myself up as high as I can and just hold there. When I can't hold that anymore, I very slowly lower myself. At that point I'm done.
 
That's a loaded question, but here are my thoughts:

If you are talking about supramaximal lifting in the form of negatives that go beyond your 1RM, then I do believe this type of training has it's place. However, in an experienced lifter capable of utilizing a lot of the resources of their nervous system, I would use this type of training infrequently. It is seriously demanding on the body.

If you are talking about accentuating the negative, i.e., lowering the weight slower than your "natural tempo," then this also can be applied with good results. Although I have seen some question this, it is generally accepted that the negative portion of the lift has more to do with hypertrophy than the positive portion of the lift. As well, some studies suggest that eccentric muscle contraction is regulated by completely different neural and metabolic processes relative to other types of muscle contraction. Therefore, training this quality would seem to be important.

Also, from a practical standpoint, I think slow negatives are great for getting someone to really groove their form on a given lift. I use slower negatives and positional isometrics with various lifts from time to time for a variety of reasons with my clients. Another good practical application is creating overload in a bodyweight maneuver, or exercise that is otherwise hard to progress without pushing the number of repetitions well into endurance territory.
 
I just think that for the most part they are forgotten. I saw one routine to try sometimes (as cowpimp mentioned) was to go super heavy with just 1 neg rep per set for hypertrophy with spotters.

and like danzik I also use them for pullups when not satisfied with how many I am able to do.

Today I loaded 285 on the smith and did neg flat presses. followed by controlled pushups (gym was empty, no spotters). then I even pressed on it while it rested on the bumpers. (never tried over 225, though it seemed easy on the smith)

then did 3x4 super slow neg chinups. some neg lat raises, and neg seated rows.

just needed to try something different. been out of the gym since I pulled my hamstring recently.
 
DD or funk: Would it be extremely beneficial to throw in a negative only/negative focus workout once in a while?

I definitely do focus on the negative in normal lifts more than the average lifter does, but would it be beneficial to say go very heavy one day with a spotter, maybe close to your 1 or 2RM, and just do excruciatingly slow negatives while getting spotted on the concentric?

I know that you can support more weight on the eccentric than the concentric, which is why I figured go very heavy with a spotter.

Would love to give that a try - would be a nice change from my normal superset workouts.

Yes, absolutely. This style of training is extremely productive. You need GOOD spotters , 2 or 3 of them for many of the lifts.
 
Back
Top