- Joined
- Jul 15, 2001
- Messages
- 10,031
- Reaction score
- 25
- Points
- 0
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
If you read anything that I posted you would know that I think it's impossible to isolate any region of a single muscle, and that is what the pec major is. Yes, it fans across the entire area of the rib cage, but it has one single point of insertion on the humerous and it is not made up of "heads". And seeing that I buy into the scientific fact that a muscle grows as a whole, no I do not think that a military press, or any other movement for that matter, will have any direct effect on any one part of the pec major, upper, lower, whatever.Originally posted by Quadsweep
Prince:
I know that it is impossible to target the inner portion of the chest and so on...
What do you think about military presses? Do you think the military press will cause almost the same amount of hypertrophy in the sternal part of the chest (lower pec) as one can get with the flat bench press? I dont think so. If your answer is no, why the hell are incline presses and flat bench presses no different?
I do not think any thing of it. See above.The clavicular part of the chest is among other things responsible for moving the upper arm upwards. As I see things the arms move upwards during an incline press and not during the flat bench press. What do you think of this? Why will this not affect the distribution of work among the heads of the Pec major?
A front raise will hit your frontal deltoid, anything else involved would be synergistic. I also view a pull-over as a back exercise, not chest.And finally do you agree or disagree that exercises such as pullovers and front raises will hit the sternal and clavicular part of the chest respectively?
Whats wrong with being synergistic? The bench press will hit your pecs, and the shoulders will be involved synergistic (or vice versa). I am sure we all agree that both pecs and shoulders get plenty of work during a bench press regardless of being synergistic.A front raise will hit your frontal deltoid, anything else involved would be synergistic.
It is also a scientific fact that mechanical stress and stretch has an effect on muscle hypertrophy. Thats the reason why stiff-legged deads are better than leg curls regardless of EMG readings...And seeing that I buy into the scientific fact that a muscle grows as a whole,
Be carefull with statements like that. Maybe I am being a bit out of contekst here, but do you do rear laterals for the front delts?...And seeing that I buy into the scientific fact that a muscle grows as a whole...
I disagree with you. I think dumbell pullovers are a good stretch for the lats and nothing else. Dumbell pullovers are like doing partial reps for the lats. From a scientific point of viewI also view a pull-over as a back exercise, not chest.
Originally posted by Quadsweep
It is also a scientific fact that mechanical stress and stretch has an effect on muscle hypertrophy. Thats the reason why stiff-legged deads are better than leg curls regardless of EMG readings...