- Joined
- Mar 20, 2002
- Messages
- 6,978
- Reaction score
- 2
- Points
- 0
- Age
- 46
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Originally posted by Eggs
OMG OMG BBG... you're pre-law? I wanna have your baaaabyy!
I do not like MS, but how you can look at this situation and say that she deserves jail time is beyond me. Give me a break, she is not getting special treatment b/c she is a celebrity, she is getting the shaft b/c she is a celebrity.
Martha Stewart was convicted Friday of trying to cover up conduct that isn't a crime. She was convicted of being greedy and of being cheap. She was convicted of having a bad memory and of being arrogant. She was convicted of acting scared and using terrible judgment. She was stupid and today the jury made her a convict.
For these transgressions - the government calls them obstructing justice and making false statements and the jury agreed
I am no lawyer but she was convicted despite the lack of direct evidence against her. She was convicted despite the fact that the circumstantial evidence was capable of creating competing inferences and therefore reasonable doubt. For example, just because Stewart was told about Waksal's interest in selling his shares on December 27, 2001 doesn't mean that she and Bacanovic didn't have a pre-existed plan to sell them. And just because the stories that Stewart and Bacanovic gave investigators didn't exactly mesh on all levels doesn't mean they were lying. The jury convicted the defendants of a conspiracy that in substance and in process never really clicked.
Originally posted by BUSTINOUT
What is so stupid is that whe would have gotten off alot easier had she not been involved in obstructing justice and lying to the government. I think if you knowingly lie, you should get your ass nailed...period.
Originally posted by Stickboy
You cannot be serious.
She COMMITED a crime. That's how I can say she deserves jail time. It's simple. There are rules in this society, and punishments for breaking them. She broke them.
If she's getting the shaft because she is a celebrity, then it's about friggin time. She SHOULD be made an example of. While I can see your point, let's look at the facts.
1. She's a former stock broker and she's on the board of the NY Stock Exchange. She knows the rules about this stuff, and lucky for her, the judge threw that charge out.
2. She LIED about what she had done. Not once, but repeatedly.
3. She conspired to cover it up. She's not an idiot. I'm sure she understood what the laws are. Hell, they even tell you before you speak, what your rights are. She didn't have to tell them anything. She decided to lie, and got caught in it.
Bottom line is: She did this to herself. She did it to save money that was nothing more than a drop in the bucket compared to what she is/was worth.
You are correct though. This wouldn't have happen to me. Why? I wouldn't have commited the crime. It was senseless and stupid, esp since she could have avoided the whole thing by NOT doing what she did.
I'm sure she want's people to feel sorry for her, and I'm sure many do (such as you). Me, I have a healthy respect for the law and feel that those that break it deserve what they get.
Originally posted by bandaidwoman
So answer this, why indict Martha and not Ken Lay ? (former chairman of Enron). Afterall, he dissimated a whole industry and ruined countless lives when they lost their retirment fund. I believe he still got to keep his golden parachute.
Hence the name "white collar" crime. YOur talking so damn stupid. YOur comparing white collar crime to murder. get off your bandwagon will you please!!!
..because SHE WAS GUILTY!!!! PLAIN AND SIMPLE THE BITCH WAS GUILTY and people like you think of her as a martyr and I just can't believe you people and what the hell your thinking!
Originally posted by firestorm
Originally posted by bandaidwoman
Does all this mean that Stewart is innocent? No.
and if THEY get caught, they will wind up in the same place she is going. Illegal trading is just that,, ILLEGAL!!!! As Stickboy said,, SHE KNOWS THE laws of trading better then any of us. SHE WAS ON THE FUQING BOARD!!! She deserves to be burried for what she did! The fact she is a female means nothing and only a woman would try that angle...good try but not good enough. She is a white collar criminal like it or not.
Where is your proof??? YOur talking crap that you have no clue about. Proove that all these men are/were performing Illegal trading and being let go. Proove it??? Substantiate your rediculous claims. The last big illegal trading case involved a MAN!! A very WEALTHY MAN who ended up in prison. I can't remember his name but he is dead now (cancer) It was a very publicized case but I can't remember his name.
Hence the name "white collar" crime. YOur talking so damn stupid. YOur comparing white collar crime to murder. get off your bandwagon will you please!!!
Oh but your soo brilliant aren't you?? who gives a crap about your social anthropologicl level statement? I don't even know what the hell that even means!!! What I do know is what matters and that is Jurors or YOUR peers found her GUILTY!! A jury made up of men and WOMEN. She had a DEFENSE team and a very expensive one at that. ONe that few of us can afford if it were us in that court room and even with that muscle she still lost because SHE WAS GUILTY!!!! PLAIN AND SIMPLE THE BITCH WAS GUILTY and people like you think of her as a martyr and I just can't believe you people and what the hell your thinking!
One name for you lady: MIKE MILKEN ever hear it? he is a man who went up the river for the same crime. More money involved but same crime just the same so where is your so called inconsistency. You have yet to show one fact that substantiates your claim the the justice system shows partiality. LIke I said the justice system didn't find her guilty,, people like you and I did.
Tsk Fire, I think that post was a tad bit disrespectful, whether you agree with what she said or not![]()
Originally posted by Eggs
Tsk Fire, I think that post was a tad bit disrespectful, whether you agree with what she said or not![]()
Originally posted by Eggs
Tsk Fire, I think that post was a tad bit disrespectful, whether you agree with what she said or not![]()
Originally posted by firestorm
Have a nice day.