i know ever one says bench press is a good mass builder, but is this becasue it builds sevral muscle groups, (chset, triceps and shoulders) so it is a good compound exercise. but are you not only as strong as your weakest link, so wouldn't your shoulders or triceps reach failure frist, when your chest in fact could off gone on for a bit longer.
so for this reason wouldn't flys be a better mass builder for the chest because there is no other muscles being worked in flys (at least i dont think there is).
please dont reply by saying just stick with the compound exercises, because i am doing them all. i just need to know if i was looking to put on some more mass just on the chest, not the shoulders or triceps, then wouldn't flys be better than bench press.
so for this reason wouldn't flys be a better mass builder for the chest because there is no other muscles being worked in flys (at least i dont think there is).
please dont reply by saying just stick with the compound exercises, because i am doing them all. i just need to know if i was looking to put on some more mass just on the chest, not the shoulders or triceps, then wouldn't flys be better than bench press.