Ron Paul 2012

[Swiper]

Seriously...ya'all need to get over this Ron Paul crap. He has NO chance of winning the election. Cry about it all you want, make excuses, whatever...He has zero chance of winning. A write-in vote for Ron Paul is a vote for Barack Obama.

And honestly, I like Ron Paul. There are many things that he says that I agree with it and think some of his policies would greatly benefit the United States. But, once we realized that he isn't going to win, and there's no possibility for him to grab the nomination, why not get behind the GOP candidate, Mitt Romney?

Newt Gingrich, Herman Cain, Michelle Bachmann, Rick Perry, Rick Santorum all were running against Romney and now they're solidifying there stance behind them. It's time for Ron Paul and his supporters to back Mitt Romney.

who in their right mind would vote for someone who doesn't share their believes? Makes no sense to me.

you keep saying you'd vote for him but he has no chance, what if everyone who said that actually voted for him? ya think he would have had a chance? I sure do.

so ur voting for the same type of politicians that created this mess and expect change? lol it's not gonna happen.

 

[secdrl]

no clue what ur talking about, care to explain yourself?

No, thanks. Before your time, rook.

 

[secdrl]

who in their right mind would vote for someone who doesn't share their believes? Makes no sense to me.

you keep saying you'd vote for him but he has no chance, what if everyone who said that actually voted for him? ya think he would have had a chance? I sure do.

so ur voting for the same type of politicians that created this mess and expect change? lol it's not gonna happen.

I keep saying I'd vote for him? Please post up the numerous occasions where I've said I'd vote for him? Again, in true liberal fashion, you're taking my context and twisting it in a direction that would benefit your position.

Of course you should vote for the candidate you like. But, he's not the nominee. He has no chance. By voting for a write-in candidate, you're influencing either side. Ron Paul, and every other libertarian candidate has never won a presidential election via write-in.

Something tells me you're 22 years old with a couple tideye t-shirts in your drawer next to your dime bag of weed.

 

[Swiper]

I keep saying I'd vote for him? Please post up the numerous occasions where I've said I'd vote for him? Again, in true liberal fashion, you're taking my context and twisting it in a direction that would benefit your position.

Of course you should vote for the candidate you like. But, he's not the nominee. He has no chance. By voting for a write-in candidate, you're influencing either side. Ron Paul, and every other libertarian candidate has never won a presidential election via write-in.

Something tells me you're 22 years old with a couple tideye t-shirts in your drawer next to your dime bag of weed.

LMAO!!! don't forget about my fading Obama poster on my wall too. lol

you say you LIKE Ron Paul, my mistake.

BTW I'll be voting Gary Johnson.

 

[secdrl]

LMAO!!! don't forget about my fading Obama poster on my wall too. lol

you say you LIKE Ron Paul, my mistake.

BTW I'll be voting Gary Johnson.

You're voting Gary Johnson but you're profile info. says RonPaul2012.com.

 

[Luxx]

Seriously...ya'all need to get over this Ron Paul crap. He has NO chance of winning the election. Cry about it all you want, make excuses, whatever...He has zero chance of winning. A write-in vote for Ron Paul is a vote for Barack Obama.

And honestly, I like Ron Paul. There are many things that he says that I agree with it and think some of his policies would greatly benefit the United States. But, once we realized that he isn't going to win, and there's no possibility for him to grab the nomination, why not get behind the GOP candidate, Mitt Romney?

Newt Gingrich, Herman Cain, Michelle Bachmann, Rick Perry, Rick Santorum all were running against Romney and now they're solidifying there stance behind them. It's time for Ron Paul and his supporters to back Mitt Romney.

I still want to see what he has to say tonight.

 

[hoyle21]

It's about moving the party. Every vote for Romney is telling the republican party you're dumb enough to vote for any idiot they nominate as long as there is a R in front of his name.

If Johnson can get 15 percent of the vote you don't think the republicans as a party would move in that direction?

The country in the long run would be better off, even if it were to bring 4 more years of Obama. We survived 8 of Bush, we can survive 8 of Obama.

 

[secdrl]

It's about moving the party. Every vote for Romney is telling the republican party you're dumb enough to vote for any idiot they nominate as long as there is a R in front of his name.If Johnson can get 15 percent of the vote you don't think the republicans as a party would move in that direction?The country in the long run would be better off, even if it were to bring 4 more years of Obama. We survived 8 of Bush, we can survive 8 of Obama.

No, we can't take another four years of Barack Obama. There is a stark difference in ideals between George W. Bush and Barack Obama. Barack Obama is looking to radically change the foundation of this country. Something George W. did not.

 

[Luxx]

No, we can't take another four years of Barack Obama. There is a stark difference in ideals between George W. Bush and Barack Obama. Barack Obama is looking to radically change the foundation of this country. Something George W. did not.

But mrs Obama says he got your back. lol

 

[hoyle21]

no, we can't take another four years of barack obama. There is a stark difference in ideals between george w. Bush and barack obama. Barack obama is looking to radically change the foundation of this country. Something george w. Did not.

b.s.

 

[troubador]

No, we can't take another four years of Barack Obama. There is a stark difference in ideals between George W. Bush and Barack Obama. Barack Obama is looking to radically change the foundation of this country. Something George W. did not.

The difference is always something Obama hasn't done yet.

 

[secdrl]

The difference is always something Obama hasn't done yet.

Correct me if I'm misreading, but you're saying that Barack Obama hasn't transformed the United States or at the very least, put it on the path to just become a third world socialist nation?

 

[troubador]

Correct me if I'm misreading, but you're saying that Barack Obama hasn't transformed the United States or at the very least, put it on the path to just become a third world socialist nation?

I don't see how he's changed direction from where it was already going. I doubt Bush would have done something like Obamacare but Romney already has. What actual changes has Obama made to alter the path of the U.S. that aren't similar to something Bush or Romney have already done?

 

[Little Wing]

there's a petition to get Betty White to speak at dnc... what i think would be even better is if Obama gave Ron Paul his 15 unedited minutes the republicans robbed him of.

 

[maniclion]

Proof the RNC is a bunch of fucking dictators!

It's time for the libertarian party to rise up, that's total bs....and petty childlike behavior blocking Ron Paul signs and tearing it out of the guys hands...

 

[Little Wing]

the teleprompter said the ayes have it before vote was even spoken.

 

[Swiper]

Paul is not going to run as a third party and didn't endorse Gary Johnson on Leno. I thought maybe he would. they have the same political views. doesn't really matter anyway Paul supports are going to vote Johnson anyway. it's about the message, not so much the person.

 

[secdrl]

I don't see how he's changed direction from where it was already going. I doubt Bush would have done something like Obamacare but Romney already has. What actual changes has Obama made to alter the path of the U.S. that aren't similar to something Bush or Romney have already done?

Well, Romney did it without raising taxes. That's the biggest difference.

I agree that country has been pretty messed up under both democratic and republic leadership, but in my opinion, Obama is implementing policies that reflect massive amounts of government control and more restrictions on individual freedoms. I know it wasn't ratified, but if he's reelected, he'll take another stab at all out gun restriction.

Under previous administrations, we may not have been liked or popular; but, we were respected and feared. Under Obama, we're a joke to our adversaries. I just don't think this guy has a positive vision for America.

 

[secdrl]

Paul is not going to run as a third party and didn't endorse Gary Johnson on Leno. I thought maybe he would. they have the same political views. doesn't really matter anyway Paul supports are going to vote Johnson anyway. it's about the message, not so much the person.

I forgot to DVR it. Did he bash the GOP or Romney at all? How was his attitude towards everything that's been going down?

 

[Dale Mabry]

Well, Romney did it without raising taxes. That's the biggest difference. Yeah, he saved that for the next guy.

I agree that country has been pretty messed up under both democratic and republic leadership, but in my opinion, Obama is implementing policies that reflect massive amounts of government control and more restrictions on individual freedoms. I know it wasn't ratified, but if he's reelected, he'll take another stab at all out gun restriction.

You say policies, name 5. Let's assume Obamacare is #1, name 4 more. There is no difference between what Obama has done and what any other yahoo would have done. The people who crashed the economy got away with it and got bailed out, the too big to fail banks are bigger, and there really is no significant difference in the regulatory environment than there was with Bush. We continued the wars, he got Bin Laden and spent far less than Bush did but we are still over there. How much higher are taxes now under Obama? If you think Romney is going to do anything different you are out of your mind. He certainly has no intention of cutting military spending. Trying to fix a system that was broken with the system that broke it is stupid. If Romney is anywhere near as good a businessman as you all think he is the second he looks at the budget you tax-cut friendly warhawks are in for some harsh realities.

Under previous administrations, we may not have been liked or popular; but, we were respected and feared. Under Obama, we're a joke to our adversaries. I just don't think this guy has a positive vision for America.

I don't know what you guys think is going to happen if Romney is elected. Romney or Obama, it doesn't matter, that debt clock is going over $20 trillion. SS, Medicare, and Defense account for every penny that is taken in in tax revenues and neither one will touch these programs significantly. Just servicing the old debt will cost $4 trillion over 4 years, that's one of the primary reasons it has surged under Obama.

 

[LAM]

Under previous administrations, we may not have been liked or popular; but, we were respected and feared. Under Obama, we're a joke to our adversaries. I just don't think this guy has a positive vision for America.

the US has no adversaries, and you would understand this if you ever bothered to read the 1992 Defense Planning Guidance as the DOD clearly stated that in black & white. but it's much easier to have tv and politicians tell you what to believe as that takes no effort.

 

[maniclion]

I don't know what you guys think is going to happen if Romney is elected. Romney or Obama, it doesn't matter, that debt clock is going over $20 trillion. SS, Medicare, and Defense account for every penny that is taken in in tax revenues and neither one will touch these programs significantly. Just servicing the old debt will cost $4 trillion over 4 years, that's one of the primary reasons it has surged under Obama.

We're going to have to start taking all the Albobs out to the deep woods and let them try to find their way to the SS office from there kind of like the Natives used to do....

 

[Decker]

Ron Paul offers simple explanations for complex topics. That's his appeal.

Why study constitutional jurisprudence when you can just read the constitoooootion (imagine Ron Paul, in that faggy grover-like voice) and get all your answers?

Why study economics when all you need to know is that gold is the only true money?

Why study government when it's true that government curtails all freedoms and devalues true money?

Paul is a waste of space. He's been in the government, which he hates, for some 30 years and he's passed only one piece of insignificant legislation into law.

He's been warning the US about hyperinflation for 30 years. I'm still waiting on that one.

 

[Decker]

Correct me if I'm misreading, but you're saying that Barack Obama hasn't transformed the United States or at the very least, put it on the path to just become a third world socialist nation?

That's a ridiculous statement.

 

[troubador]

Ron Paul offers simple explanations for complex topics. That's his appeal.

Why study constitutional jurisprudence when you can just read the constitoooootion (imagine Ron Paul, in that faggy grover-like voice) and get all your answers?

Why study economics when all you need to know is that gold is the only true money?

Why study government when it's true that government curtails all freedoms and devalues true money?

Why form an argument when you could just state conclusions?

 

[Swiper]

I forgot to DVR it. Did he bash the GOP or Romney at all? How was his attitude towards everything that's been going down?

he said nothing new. might b on YouTube now. he has always been nice to mitt. it seems like they have respect for each other. I know Ann romney and carol Paul (ron pauls wife) have become good friends during the campaign season.

 

[Decker]

Why form an argument when you could just state conclusions?

Wow! You just turned the tables on me.

So I take it you're a Ron Paul supporter?

How unfortunate.

 

[Swiper]

Ron Paul offers simple explanations for complex topics. That's his appeal.

Why study constitutional jurisprudence when you can just read the constitoooootion (imagine Ron Paul, in that faggy grover-like voice) and get all your answers?

Why study economics when all you need to know is that gold is the only true money?

Why study government when it's true that government curtails all freedoms and devalues true money?

Paul is a waste of space. He's been in the government, which he hates, for some 30 years and he's passed only one piece of insignificant legislation into law.

He's been warning the US about hyperinflation for 30 years. I'm still waiting on that one.

the constitution means nothing to u. I get it.

try studying about austrian economics. maybe you'll learn a thing or two. that's what Paul believes in. u obviously don't know much about the man and libertarian ideas.

incase you've haven't noticed we've been loosing our freedoms for a long time. but I guess u like govt intervention in ur daily life as much as possible.

I wouldn't judge a Politician on how many laws they pass. just the opposite. repealing laws is much better.

inflation? really? take a look at prices in the past compared to today. look at income too.

 

[Little Wing]

Ron Paul was cut from speaking at rnc because he was not willing to support or endorse Mitt Romney.

Paul admitted his lack of a RNC speaking slot was probably because he refused to endorse Romney

Ron Paul: His Future Will Not Be Third Party, But the GOP is Not His Party Either, and He Thinks Gary Johnson is "Wonderful" - Hit & Run : Reason.com

 

[Decker]

the constitution means nothing to u. I get it.

try studying about austrian economics. maybe you'll learn a thing or two. that's what Paul believes in. u obviously don't know much about the man and libertarian ideas.

incase you've haven't noticed we've been loosing our freedoms for a long time. but I guess u like govt intervention in ur daily life as much as possible.

I wouldn't judge a Politician on how many laws they pass. just the opposite. repealing laws is much better.

inflation? really? take a look at prices in the past compared to today. look at income too.

The constitution means quite a bit to me...the great and glorious living document shaped by the times and the Supreme Court.

Austrian economics is for luddite dullards. The US has been off of the gold standard for 40+ years. Austrian Economics is useless. Try Charatlism. I've found that most Libertarian thinkers are free loaders with a very limited understanding of life in general.

Losing our Freedoms? Yeah, Social Security - freedom from elderly destitution. Medicare- freedom from elderly medical treatment, public education...freedom from ignorance...but I know what you mean. Bush and by extension, Obama, have crapped on aspects of our constitutional rights.

Yeah, let's get rid of regulations! Or at least stop enforcing the regulations on the books. That worked so well for our financial markets the last few years.

We need regulations. Imagine a football game without refs and rules. Why is that so hard to see?