• Hello, this board in now turned off and no new posting.
    Please REGISTER at Anabolic Steroid Forums, and become a member of our NEW community!
  • Check Out IronMag Labs® KSM-66 Max - Recovery and Anabolic Growth Complex

SAT scores show republicans are far above national average and the Dems are not

Democrat or repub AKA ASS or Elephant

  • Dem

    Votes: 5 31.3%
  • Rep

    Votes: 11 68.8%

  • Total voters
    16
  • Poll closed .
Muscle Gelz Transdermals
IronMag Labs Prohormones
Crono1000 said:
once again South Carolina ranks low on the list though :lol:
Poor school systems :shrug: or are families moving in from other states?
 
:nope:
nope, south carolina is just stupid
:hehe:

I can tell you as a former South Carolinian student that it has a very poor school system. Oh yeah, we've earned that rank

Go #50!
 
bandaidwoman said:
I only had a 1380. :(

:twitch:


BTW, where is the option for independents? I think both parties suck ass, i.e. YOU ALL SUCK. :p
 
I Are Baboon said:
:twitch:


BTW, where is the option for independents? I think both parties suck ass, i.e. YOU ALL SUCK. :p

That's what I'm talking about :thumb:
 
cman said:
I lived in Mich and we took the sat in junior high.

So you took the SAT in Michigan and live in GA. Notice Michigan went for Kerry and GA went for Bush. Your circumstance proves my point. If your vote counts in GA, but your SAT counts the data is wrong.

So I am guessing your parents voted GOP and that is how you voted. So you voted GOP in GA and they voted GOP in Michigan. Michigan went Dem and GA went GOP. Is this even sinking in yet?

I'll make it very easy. The only way that SAT scores could be correlated with the way a person votes is if they were asked who they voted for and then asked what their SAT was. This was not done that way, they took data from whoever does the SAT and then they figured out which states went which way. Also, the data assumes that each blue state is 100% blue and each red stat is 100% red. A large portion of the states were no more than 55% either way. So let's say States A has an SAT mean of 1200 and went blue. Now, of the 45% that went red, the average SAT was 1400 and of those that voted blue the average SAT 1000. It could go either way.
 
Dale Mabry said:
So you took the SAT in Michigan and live in GA. Notice Michigan went for Kerry and GA went for Bush. Your circumstance proves my point. If your vote counts in GA, but your SAT counts the data is wrong.

So I am guessing your parents voted GOP and that is how you voted. So you voted GOP in GA and they voted GOP in Michigan. Michigan went Dem and GA went GOP. Is this even sinking in yet?

I'll make it very easy. The only way that SAT scores could be correlated with the way a person votes is if they were asked who they voted for and then asked what their SAT was. This was not done that way, they took data from whoever does the SAT and then they figured out which states went which way. Also, the data assumes that each blue state is 100% blue and each red stat is 100% red. A large portion of the states were no more than 55% either way. So let's say States A has an SAT mean of 1200 and went blue. Now, of the 45% that went red, the average SAT was 1400 and of those that voted blue the average SAT 1000. It could go either way.
You apearently are incapable of logical reasoning. I said, At the time of an election, your kids take an sat, you vote for Kerry, your kids score low. you vote for bush, your kids score high. you grow up, vote like your parents. stupid low sat dem kids grow up to be stupid low sat adult Kerry voters,
 
So you have data that shows that stupid people have stupid kids? You also have data showing that all people who voted for Kerry have lower SATs than those that voted for Bush?

So did you vote in GA or MI?

BTW, your wrong, just admit it. You are really stretching with the dumb kids dumb parents thing. Besides, I have the same IQ as OD, and we voted differently. This in and of itself disproves your point.
 
cman said:
You apearently are incapable of logical reasoning. I said, At the time of an election, your kids take an sat, you vote for Kerry, your kids score low. you vote for bush, your kids score high. you grow up, vote like your parents. stupid low sat dem kids grow up to be stupid low sat adult Kerry voters,
But you missed the step where your kids moved to GA, and then participate in the next election :shrug:
 
Luke9583 said:
But you missed the step where your kids moved to GA, and then participate in the next election :shrug:

How he is incapable of grasping this very basic statistical concept is beyond me. :shrug:
 
cman said:
You apearently are incapable of logical reasoning. I said, At the time of an election, your kids take an sat, you vote for Kerry, your kids score low. you vote for bush, your kids score high. you grow up, vote like your parents. stupid low sat dem kids grow up to be stupid low sat adult Kerry voters,
Dito
 
cman said:
Are you agreeing with yourself :confused:

It's good to see you haven't changed your mind :grin:
 
You're forgetting immigrants. (The legal ones, anyway.) Many come here in their late teens. So by the time the SAT's roll around, they wouldn't have been here long enough to do well on the English portion. Doesn't mean they're stupid.

Later, many of them tend to vote Democrat. :shrug:
 
MaxMirkin said:
You're forgetting immigrants. (The legal ones, anyway.) Many come here in their late teens. So by the time the SAT's roll around, they wouldn't have been here long enough to do well on the English portion. Doesn't mean they're stupid.

Later, many of them tend to vote Democrat. :shrug:

Max, you know better than that, you know the immigrant vote is never actualloy counted. We just let them go thru the process to make them feel like Americans. :D
 
Dale Mabry said:
Max, you know better than that, you know the immigrant vote is never actualloy counted. We just let them go thru the process to make them feel like Americans. :D
You may be right. I've never actually bothered to vote myself, so can't really disprove the theory. :hmmm: :shrug:
 
MaxMirkin said:
You may be right. I've never actually bothered to vote myself, so can't really disprove the theory. :hmmm: :shrug:
I recall seeing you give the nod to Bush and even claiming a plan to go out and vote for the guy ... that future bride keeping you to busy to go waste your vote?
 
Here is another interesting demographic analysis. In terms of political funding for a party, those who are faculty at Ivey League schools overwhelmingly support democratic candidates (I'm sure these guys have high IQ's, my alma mater is one of them...Dartmouth.)

http://davidm.blogspot.com/2004/07/political-giving-at-ivy-league-schools.html

It was a small database and has imperfections (as Dale will point out) but nevertheless interesting

...... I found 792 donations to the 2004 campaigns of Bush and Kerry from individuals employed by Ivy League schools. An astonishing 92% of those donations were to Kerry. Dartmouth had the highest percent for Kerry (97%) and Princeton the highest for Bush (16%). Harvard had more than double the total donations of any other school, while Brown and Dartmouth had the fewest total donations. Here are the results:



Brown: Kerry 24, Bush 3 (Kerry 89%)
Columbia: Kerry 118, Bush 18 (Kerry 87%)
Cornell: Kerry 76, Bush 6 (Kerry 93%)
Dartmouth: Kerry 30, Bush 1 (Kerry 97%)
Harvard: Kerry 280, Bush 17 (Kerry 94%)
Penn: Kerry 38, Bush 2 (Kerry 95%)
Princeton: Kerry 74, Bush 14 (Kerry 84%)
Yale: Kerry 85, Bush 6 (Kerry 93%)
-------------------------------------------
Total: Kerry 725, Bush 67 (Kerry 92%)
The data are imperfect as noted in the methodology section below. However, none of the imperfections seem likely to bias the data significantly in terms of what percentage of gifts went to which campaign....
 
BoneCrusher said:
I recall seeing you give the nod to Bush and even claiming a plan to go out and vote for the guy ... that future bride keeping you to busy to go waste your vote?
I tried to vote for Bush, but they just pointed out that I'm in New York & laughed at me. :(
 
MaxMirkin said:
I tried to vote for Bush, but they just pointed out that I'm in New York & laughed at me. :(
That is funny, where have you been. I miss your pleasently offensive remarks.
 
MaxMirkin said:
I tried to vote for Bush, but they just pointed out that I'm in New York & laughed at me. :(
ANd made sure you had an 8 hour line to wait in too ... :laugh:
 
Muscle Gelz Transdermals
IronMag Labs Prohormones
Luke9583 said:
Are you agreeing with yourself :confused:

It's good to see you haven't changed your mind :grin:
I see this one word reply escapes you, so go back to bed.
 
cman said:
That is funny, where have you been. I miss your pleasently offensive remarks.
I got a new dog & a new wife.....and they both have needs. :D
 
How is Bone crusher today?
 
MaxMirkin said:
I got a new dog & a new wife.....and they both have needs. :D
You are joking, right!
Like a instant family just add a dad.
 
By the way, I suspect the poll; is off, it apears some of the democrats were frome Dade county. Need I say more?
 
Last edited:
cman said:
You are joking, right!
Like a instant family just add a dad.
Instant, my ass! She had to beg/threaten/hold my DVD collection hostage, for like 5 years before I said "yes."

The dog I actually wanted. :laugh:
 
MaxMirkin said:
Instant, my ass! She had to beg/threaten/hold my DVD collection hostage, for like 5 years before I said "yes."

The dog I actually wanted. :laugh:
You are rotton:laugh:
 
BoneCrusher said:
Max you animal you ... :finger:
He's a cute little Yorkie....would you say no? :D
 
I'm doing OK today Cman. BTW it is spelled -poll- not "pole". Please correct me when ya catch it I hate posting stuff with illiteracies in it.
 
Back
Top