Did you weigh your food? Did you live inside a metabolic lab for the duration? If not, then you have insufficient evidence to refute this conclusion.
Eating INfrequently has a plethora of health benefits, including improved insulin sensitivity and muscle synthesis. Intermittent fasting has fallen out of this fact. The six meals a day thing does feel more comfortable for some. But not all, and I for one am relieved that it is by no means necessary or metabolically advantageous, outside of personal comfort.
Put it this way: given the choice, I'd rather skip breakfast and have a larger supper - so I have trained myself to go hungry in the morning and overeat at night. For me - MUCH better. For you, not so much. Awesome that both approaches work.
I'll add this is not new information. We have known this since at least 1997:
Br J Nutr. 1997 Apr;77 Suppl 1:S57-70.
Meal frequency and energy balance.
Bellisle F, McDevitt R, Prentice AM.
INSERM U341, Hotel Dieu de Paris, France.
Abstract
Several epidemiological studies have observed an inverse relationship between people's habitual frequency of eating and body weight, leading to the suggestion that a 'nibbling' meal pattern may help in the avoidance of obesity. A review of all pertinent studies shows that, although many fail to find any significant relationship, the relationship is consistently inverse in those that do observe a relationship. However, this finding is highly vulnerable to the probable confounding effects of post hoc changes in dietary patterns as a consequence of weight gain and to dietary under-reporting which undoubtedly invalidates some of the studies. We conclude that the epidemiological evidence is at best very weak, and almost certainly represents an artefact. A detailed review of the possible mechanistic explanations for a metabolic advantage of nibbling meal patterns failed to reveal significant benefits in respect of energy expenditure. Although some short-term studies suggest that the thermic effect of feeding is higher when an isoenergetic test load is divided into multiple small meals, other studies refute this, and most are neutral. More importantly,
studies using whole-body calorimetry and doubly-labelled water to assess total 24 h energy expenditure find no difference between nibbling and gorging. Finally,
with the exception of a single study, there is no evidence that weight loss on hypoenergetic regimens is altered by meal frequency. We conclude that any effects of meal pattern on the regulation of body weight are likely to be mediated through effects on the food intake side of the energy balance equation.
