Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
why do u said that? have u seen a anatomia book?There is no upper pec. Are you bulking and lifting heavy? How many calories are you eating and what your chest workouts look like?
I think Merkaba is just reiterating njc's point: the chest is all one mass, it's not divided into sections like various exercises suggest. I assume the question regarding calories, bulking and whether you're lifting heavy or not, is all to do with if you want more chest growth, you need to left heavy and ensure you consume the calories to enable it to grow. If you're training hard but not eating enough to capitalise on your hard work, you probably won't see much development. Apologies if you know this already, and sorry if I'm not clear and my choice of words are poor.
And if it is all "one" muscle that one muscle how come the upper region of people who do not do incline.
A good rule of thumb to make an example of the pectorals if I ask you to isolate and flex the upper area of the pecs, then the lower, can you do it?
you are talking about muscle contracction and relax.i am just speculating but-
If you stand in the Anatomical postition and flex your pectoral the lower sweep will harden and the striations in the lower portion will appear, however if you then raise your arms to your sides parallel to the ground and flex again their should be a more or less even 'hardness' across the pectoral regions upper and lower. Now again raise your arms to your sides but above the horizontal plane as if you wre performing incline presses,now flex. The 'upper' region should now be the hardess showing striations across the clavicle. One point of this is that when the arms are raised up the lower portion of the chest is more stretched to compensate for the angle of the press and will not engage in the same manner it would in a flat or decline movement.
Does this demonstrate the isolation of pectoral regions ?
RC
Oh my god...
Instead of flex, I shouldve said contract.
Oh my god...
Instead of flex, I shouldve said contract.
i am just speculating but-
If you stand in the Anatomical postition and flex your pectoral the lower sweep will harden and the striations in the lower portion will appear, however if you then raise your arms to your sides parallel to the ground and flex again their should be a more or less even 'hardness' across the pectoral regions upper and lower. Now again raise your arms to your sides but above the horizontal plane as if you wre performing incline presses,now flex. The 'upper' region should now be the hardess showing striations across the clavicle. One point of this is that when the arms are raised up the lower portion of the chest is more stretched to compensate for the angle of the press and will not engage in the same manner it would in a flat or decline movement.
Does this demonstrate the isolation of pectoral regions ?
RC
Ok, Im getting the fuck out of here.