like I stated there are dozens of them out there. this stuff is from '97 and I don't have all my bookmarks from papers that I read years ago, as most of us are so far past this.
and as I have stated before you work in the industry, an unbiased opinion or objectivity is impossible, your livelihood depends on this industry while mine does not.
believe you what you want, quite obvious you are the fucking idiot. it's always the persons fault and never the legislation or market for lobbying to change the rules and regulations. that cheesy little series 7 license that you have doesn't mean squat and I know dudes that are half-retarded that passed that exam.




I'm biased because I work in the capital markets??? What the fuck does the stock market have to do with housing prices or upside down mortgages??? I've got nothing to be biased about. I work as a Financial Advisor and I have accerditation which makes me an expert in areas of finance and economics, unlike you dip shit. I don't sell propriatary products, I have no aganda. Let me get this straight, because I work int he money business and I have accreditation, I'm biased and full of shit. But you, a guy who is a hobby economist and has fucking zero access to current data put out by financial institutions, knows a whole lot. You use a research paper to represent theory as fact and then you call me an idiot.
BTW, we do not write the series 7 in Canada, but we are exempt from writing the full version of it, if we want to register in the U.S.

OK, so since you are skirting my question in our original argument. I will give you the answer. Canada's housing market has not crashed because we have much stricter banking laws and lending rules. For 1, if you want a higher ratio mortgage (like which would be insured by a Fannie Mea), you have to have a minimum credit score. 2. you must produce a minimum 5% downpayment and prove the funds were in your account for longer than 3 months; they must not have been gifted to you. If your credit score is not high enough, the downpayment is 10%. 3. You must qualify based on affordability of payments at the 5 year posted rate of interest, not a discounted rate and there is no such thing as an adjusted rate mortgage in Canada. So you could technically get a 200 basis point discount on a mortgage, but you cannot qualify for insurance at these rates (nor the mortgage). Canada's mortgage cannot be securitized like the mortgatges in the U.S. We did not have a problem with ABCP.
This dipshit, is the reason our real estate market did not colapse.
With the exception of interest deductibility, our taxes on the gains of your principle residence is actually less than yours (zero). On second and third properties, capital gains were lowered significantly after you lowered yours. Much of Canada's tax legislation has followed the US in recent decades.
I did not say I don't believe in legislations, not once. I said your theory is totally full of shit. I do believe in good lending practices and rules that would have financial institutions play fair. Your government not only loosened lending requirements for high ratio mortgages, mortgage companies broke what rules did exist. It was a repeat of the American Savings and Loans crisis x 1000.
So what exactly do you do for a living...I'm guessing a bartender? But I also heard in another thread that you were aplying for a mail room position with Ernst and Young...based on your superior, unaccredited experience with Economics.

Last edited: