Pathetically low blow. Real nice.
I totally disagree... if you support suppressing education, you deserve that kind of criticism. Especially when your own policy could very well be responsible for the situation.
Nothing low about it
-
Hello, this board in now turned off and no new posting.
Please REGISTER at Anabolic Steroid Forums, and become a member of our NEW community!
-
Check Out IronMag Labs® KSM-66 Max - Recovery and Anabolic Growth Complex
Sarah Palin?!?!
- Thread starter Splash Log
- Start date
I totally disagree... if you support suppressing education, you deserve that kind of criticism. Especially when your own policy could very well be responsible for the situation.
Nothing low about it
Enjoy raising your grandchildren
(Now that was a low blow)
If you knew ANYTHING about kids today, you would know they are most likely going to do it. Not giving them options is just setting yourself and them up for failure
I don't think she's going to raise them, these people usually hire nannys to raise them.
nope, just not a disillusioned moron
Yup, that is much more responsible
Yep.
Besides, A child with downs syndrome is going to require more than just "raising" anyway. I'm sure they have the resurces to provide their child with everything he needs.
Enjoy raising your grandchildren
(Now that was a low blow)
If you knew ANYTHING about kids today, you would know they are most likely going to do it. Not giving them options is just setting yourself and them up for failure
I already answered that. I'm not an idiot, but I'm not taking part in it. Just like my kids will probably try weed, I'm not going to supply it or give the impression that it's ok.
If they have children, they will raise them. Unlike too many parents today, my children will be held accountable for their mistakes.. I'm not bailing them out. Of course I would help them, but they will be responsible for their actions... the way it use to be done before the 60's came along & nobody was responsible for anything anymore.
It's a low blow to go after someone's child when you know nothing about their household, nothing about their upbringing, nothing about their child, nothing period. You're making assumptions that you have no possible way of knowing.
no way to know that either.
Why bother with having kids.
I admire that, I hope he lives a good life.Yep.
Besides, A child with downs syndrome is going to require more than just "raising" anyway. I'm sure they have the resurces to provide their child with everything he needs.
If I knew I was going to be born with Downs Syndrome I would rather not be born, it's no way to live.
Are you asking why Sarah Palin even has kids because she's having a nanny take care of them? That wasn't even established! Geez...this line of thinking is better suited for the daily kos.
Nope, but just like we as humans like to stereotype the poor, the minorities we can also do the same with the rich.
They mostly have nannys raise them, send them away to summer camp.
No, this was not about her.
I was answering Neil.
Go back and read my post about me being a Grandparent with a teenager, Sarah has commited no crime.
She is going to be very busy from here on out, she will need help raising her kids.
I imagine she was pretty busy to begin with. Either way....nanny, school teacher, baby sitter....We don't raise our kids completely anyway. (Not that we don't want to, of course)
I read a total rumor on the intarweb that suggested the baby was actually the 17 year old daughter's baby and that Pali and her husband were raising as their own.
Now wouldn't THAT be the death of the Republican ticket? LOL
'but you ain't heard that from me cuz I ain't one to gossip! No sirre- that Ms. Jenkins is a saint!
Yeah I read that too but its such a 'rumor' that its not something that will sway my decision.
Now one thing I did read is that the completed investigation to her abusing her power in office is going to be completed and announced 5 days before election and that could seriously harm the Republicans. Stupid for McCain to choose her.
- Joined
- Jul 23, 2004
- Messages
- 2,644
- Reaction score
- 34
- Points
- 0
This what I love about liberals. You get so high and mighty about being progressive and caring. You claim responsibility for the civil rights revolution, and women's sexual revolution. Then, when it suits your purpose, you assert that a woman with kids can't get the job done. It is pretty fucking shameful.
I would bet anything if Palin were a Democrat you would be on this like flies on shit.
Hillary caught so much crap because her husband played her dirty....Hillary didn't stick that cigar up that fat turd twat, it was Bill!
- Joined
- Jul 23, 2004
- Messages
- 2,644
- Reaction score
- 34
- Points
- 0
Hillary caught crap for staying with a man who cheated on her for a decade. Hardly comparable to having a child.
Remember this is the media and the Democrats talking about how she raised her child, how could Parlin let this happen.
Mind you I went through the same thing.
- Joined
- Jul 13, 2004
- Messages
- 32,369
- Reaction score
- 2,936
- Points
- 0
- Age
- 52
- Location
- In a van, down by the river...
"These are the sensitive liberal people who are always yelling about everybodyâ??????s freedom of speech and expression. Unless you say something that pisses them off!
Then they canâ??????t wait to tie your ass to the back bumper of a Toyota Hybrid and drag you to the Berkeley Campus and drop your carcass in front of the Fidel Castro Building for the Continuing Study of Why America Sucks!" - Richard Jeni
Damn right.
Is Neil a liberal? Are you Neil?
That's not true, while it may be hard but I've worked part time, went to school, trained and then cooked for the family.
It does help when your spouse does their end.
That's not true, while it may be hard but I've worked part time, went to school, trained and then cooked for the family.
It does help when your spouse does their end.
Bill O'Reilly on teen pregnancies
by kos
Tue Sep 02, 2008 at 01:50:28 PM PDT
He was for blaming the parents before he was against it.
Then again, hypocrite extraordinaire O'Reilly never met a glass house he didn't shatter.
- Joined
- Jun 27, 2001
- Messages
- 11,622
- Reaction score
- 333
- Points
- 0
- Age
- 63
- Location
- An alternate reality.
It's even deeper than that. Aren't liberals the champions of minorities, especially women? But listen to the questions they're asking, "Can she possibly be a good Veep and raise a family at the same time? How can she possibly take care of a Down Syndrom child and be a heartbeat away from the Oval Office?" What a crock. Liberals have been screaming about the ability of women to do that for decades, but now that one is actually doing it they're up in arms because she's from the wrong side of the aisle. Would you hear this same question from liberals if it was Mr. Palin who was running? Nope, not a peep. Dumbass hypocrites. It's no coincidence that Liberal and Loser both begin with an L.
Not mine
It's even deeper than that. Aren't liberals the champions of minorities, especially women? But listen to the questions they're asking, "Can she possibly be a good Veep and raise a family at the same time? How can she possibly take care of a Down Syndrom child and be a heartbeat away from the Oval Office?" What a crock. Liberals have been screaming about the ability of women to do that for decades, but now that one is actually doing it they're up in arms because she's from the wrong side of the aisle. Would you hear this same question from liberals if it was Mr. Palin who was running? Nope, not a peep. Dumbass hypocrites. It's no coincidence that Liberal and Loser both begin with an L.
And it's no coincidence that Republican and Retard begin with an R? I can play that game too
Stop squabbling over petty details and look at her past accomplishments and failures as governor. In my opinion she isn't fit for this level of leadership, but then again neither is McCain or Obama.
