• Hello, this board in now turned off and no new posting.
    Please REGISTER at Anabolic Steroid Forums, and become a member of our NEW community!
  • Check Out IronMag Labs® KSM-66 Max - Recovery and Anabolic Growth Complex

Casey Anthony

All we can do is armchair quarterback this. We weren't in the courtroom, we weren't on the jury. She had her day in court and there simply wasn't enough evidence or testimony to prove beyond the shadow of a doubt.
 
All we can do is armchair quarterback this. We weren't in the courtroom, we weren't on the jury. She had her day in court and there simply wasn't enough evidence or testimony to prove beyond the shadow of a doubt.

historical in the US women don't get the death penalty, that was a bad call by the DA. they should know to use historical data more efficiently and not public opinion.
 
She was already convicted by public opinion.
 
She's as innocent as OJ was. :hmmm: Justice system is a joke.
 
She's as innocent as OJ was. :hmmm: Justice system is a joke.

not even apples to apples...OJ was straight busted he just wasn't caught at the scene. he had a team of great lawyers.

there was very little hard evidence in the Anthony case, and Jose Biaz is far from a great lawyer. as the saying goes it's not what you know but what you can prove.
 
Justice system is a joke.

Dude... are you ******* serious? This case speaks volumes of our legal system. A white trash mother was accused of killing a child in a conservative state. Everyone acted as if she was guilty from day one. The "mob" would have had her head 3 years ago.

But, instead, an impartial jury got to hear the case in a level-headed arena. She was innocent until proven guilty. The jury found that the government didn't meet its burden of proving her guilt. Why don't you look up the reasons why we have trial by jury. It protects us all from government taking away our liberty arbitrarily. It protects us all from corruption.

When "beyond any reasonable doubt" goes away, we all become criminals.

Remember that, "It is better to risk saving a guilty man than to condemn an innocent one." (Voltaire)

This is what America is based on. If you want summary executions, get the f*ck out of this country. If you aren't familiar with the Constitution, then go read it. Get yourself educated before you say such ignorant things.
 
Dude... are you ******* serious? This case speaks volumes of our legal system. A white trash mother was accused of killing a child in a conservative state. Everyone acted as if she was guilty from day one. The "mob" would have had her head 3 years ago.

But, instead, an impartial jury got to hear the case in a level-headed arena. She was innocent until proven guilty. The jury found that the government didn't meet its burden of proving her guilt. Why don't you look up the reasons why we have trial by jury. It protects us all from government taking away our liberty arbitrarily. It protects us all from corruption.

When "beyond any reasonable doubt" goes away, we all become criminals.

Remember that, "It is better to risk saving a guilty man than to condemn an innocent one." (Voltaire)

This is what America is based on. If you want summary executions, get the f*ck out of this country. If you aren't familiar with the Constitution, then go read it. Get yourself educated before you say such ignorant things.

VERY well said!!! If I knew how to give you reps I totally would lol.
 
not really a surprise in a state with drive through liquor stores and well Rick Scott...

Oh, I can't help it.......................HANGING CHADS!
 
Muscle Gelz Transdermals
IronMag Labs Prohormones
little wing - in my understanding of all of the charges, premeditation was not required.

To be convicted of 1st Degree murder, Premeditation is a pre-req. If it was just "in the moment", it is 2nd degree and takes away the death penalty. This is NC law.
 
Dude... are you ******* serious? This case speaks volumes of our legal system. A white trash mother was accused of killing a child in a conservative state. Everyone acted as if she was guilty from day one. The "mob" would have had her head 3 years ago.

But, instead, an impartial jury got to hear the case in a level-headed arena. She was innocent until proven guilty. The jury found that the government didn't meet its burden of proving her guilt. Why don't you look up the reasons why we have trial by jury. It protects us all from government taking away our liberty arbitrarily. It protects us all from corruption.

When "beyond any reasonable doubt" goes away, we all become criminals.

Remember that, "It is better to risk saving a guilty man than to condemn an innocent one." (Voltaire)

This is what America is based on. If you want summary executions, get the f*ck out of this country. If you aren't familiar with the Constitution, then go read it. Get yourself educated before you say such ignorant things.

:roflmao: Really man? Get educated before I say such ignorant things, do you even know me? No, and you have no idea of my history of studying the law. Don't even get me started, but I'll give you one example. In California you can kill someone with a car, run them over and over and while drunk and get a max of 3-5 years, however if you were to do the same thing say get into a bar fight and kill someone on accident you can get 15-20 years or even 25+, Now tell me the difference... Killing someone is killing someone.

There is so much wrong shit with this justice system, so much. Did I say line them up and kill someone? No I didn't, I just said are justice system is fucked up. Obviously you haven't been in a situation where the law (again justice system) completely fucked you over. Wake up and smell the shit.
 
:roflmao: Really man? Get educated before I say such ignorant things, do you even know me? No, and you have no idea of my history of studying the law. Don't even get me started, but I'll give you one example. In California you can kill someone with a car, run them over and over and while drunk and get a max of 3-5 years, however if you were to do the same thing say get into a bar fight and kill someone on accident you can get 15-20 years or even 25+, Now tell me the difference... Killing someone is killing someone.

There is so much wrong shit with this justice system, so much. Did I say line them up and kill someone? No I didn't, I just said are justice system is fucked up. Obviously you haven't been in a situation where the law (again justice system) completely fucked you over. Wake up and smell the shit.


Sure, the justice system has it's flaws, but imo they're totally irrelevant with this case. You might as well just blanket the country as a whole with your statement if you want to bring in irrelevant topics. This case surely shows the positive sides of our system in how emotions do not render verdicts; Only hard evidence does. That's hugely important and says quite a bit about how well the system does work in some instances. Not trying to attack you, I just think your grudge against our justice system is hindering your seeing the way this case went fluently. just my $0.02

To be convicted of 1st Degree murder, Premeditation is a pre-req. If it was just "in the moment", it is 2nd degree and takes away the death penalty. This is NC law.


With "NC" are you saying north carolina? If so, not sure what that has to do with a florida case. If it's some other abbreviation, I missed it. But thanks, I wasn't sure if you could still have 1st degree without pre med. However, I bet it would be possible to argue pre med even if days hadn't passed before the killing. You could plan a murder out even minutes before you act it out.
 
I understand there was a lot of emotion involved instead of logic, but my opinion the bitch did it and should fry for it
 
Yes it is North Carolina law. But I think it is the same in most states......google Florida 1st degree murder elements.
 
lol with all the arguments i'm having on fb check out what popped up....too bad it's not really her :lol:

34ynwbs.jpg
 
back off my woman....i'm gonna ask her out when she's released and yes we will have a sextape scandal!!!
 
back off my woman....i'm gonna ask her out when she's released and yes we will have a sextape scandal!!!

I suggest wearing a condom so we don't have to endure another trial with her and an "accidental" death of another baby...
 
I suggest wearing a condom so we don't have to endure another trial with her and an "accidental" death of another baby...

Atleast you won't have to pay for an abortion.





too cruel, too cruel.
 
She rid the world of a physical exemplification of the human cycle and, in doing so (as far as I am concerned), did our evolution as human being's a favor.
 
Who is the father of Casey Anthony baby?

they don't really know...one time they said he was dead in a car accident, another time i heard he just abandoned casey and caylee. who knows
 
Whatever happens at sentencing, some still want Casey Anthony to pay

Whatever happens at sentencing, some still want Casey Anthony to pay

By Lateef Mungin, CNN
UPDATED: 03:54 AM EDT 07.07.11

Whether or not Casey Anthony goes free after her sentencing Thursday, the saga of the 25-year-old Orlando woman acquitted of killing her 2-year-old daughter is far from over.

The state of Florida and a woman named Zenaida Gonzalez want Anthony back in a courtroom soon, along with a firm that helped search for Anthony's daughter when she was reported missing.

Anthony is due in court Thursday for a sentencing hearing on four misdemeanor counts of lying to police regarding a missing person case -- the only charges she was convicted of during her seven-week long murder trial.

She avoided the most serious charges when a jury acquitted her of first degree murder, aggravated child abuse and aggravated manslaughter in the 2008 death of her daughter Caylee.

Each misdemeanor count carries a maximum sentence of one year in county jail, for which Judge Belvin Perry has the option of sentencing her consecutively or concurrently.

Many legal experts believe Anthony will be freed on time-served because she has already been jailed for about three years.

Now, Florida officials are asking that Anthony repay the state for the enormous cost of investigating the case.

In a motion filed Wednesday, the state is urging a judge to set a hearing so it can tally up costs and slap Anthony with the bill.

"The efforts and costs of the investigation were extensive and not immediately available and accordingly, the State of Florida respectfully requests this Court to set a hearing within 60 days to determine total costs," the motion says.

The motion cites a Florida law that allows the state to fine defendants in criminal cases to recoup money spent.

"I think that is such a bogus move by the state," CNN legal analyst Jeffery Toobin said on CNN's "John King USA."

"Casey Anthony won and the state lost," Toobin said. "The state's got to deal with that fact. Maybe they should be better at their jobs, not trying to sue the winner of this case. I just think that this is silly, trivial, demeaning to all concerned."

Marcia Clark, the former Los Angeles prosecutor in the 1995 O.J. Simpson murder trial, said California has a similar law that allows defendants to be fined.

"Look, we're all in dire straits financially and when a case costs undue amount of money and there's extra costs, really should the taxpayer bear that cost?" Clark said. "Why shouldn't the defendant bear the cost? She was convicted, after all. She wasn't completely acquitted."

Texas Equusearch, a firm that helped search for Anthony's daughter, also wants its money back. The company said it used 4,200 searchers and spent $112,000 looking for Caylee in Florida after the girl was reported missing n July 2008, CNN affiliate KTRK reported.

Tim Miller, the head of company, told the affiliate he now believes Caylee was never missing -- and he is contemplating a lawsuit.

"This is the money that really needed to go to families that need us," Miller told the television station.

Additionally, Anthony will also have to deal with a defamation lawsuit from the real Zenaida Gonzalez.

At the time of Caylee's disappearance, Anthony told family members and police that a nanny named Zenaida Fernandez Gonzalez had kidnapped the toddler.

Authorities never found a nanny by that name who cared for Caylee. They did, however, find a woman named Zenaida Fernandez Gonzalez, who denied ever meeting Anthony.

Gonzalez filed a defamation defamation lawsuit that has yet to be settled in court.

From CNN.com
 
That's the fucking truth. Fine her outta of spite. Grudge fines cause she got away with or merely won.
 
"Casey Anthony won and the state lost," Toobin said. "The state's got to deal with that fact. Maybe they should be better at their jobs, not trying to sue the winner of this case. I just think that this is silly, trivial, demeaning to all concerned."

couldn't have said it better. Get over yourselves. You lost boo hoo. It seems it's still pinned in their heads that she's guilty. Well from a legal stand point she's innocent, so they need to look at it from that angle. You're going to sue a woman for the amount it cost to investigate your daughter's murder? ;)
 
It seems it's still pinned in their heads that she's guilty. Well from a legal stand point she's innocent, so they need to look at it from that angle. You're going to sue a woman for the amount it cost to investigate your daughter's murder? ;)

Definitely see your point, however I get that Texas Equusearch and Zenaida Fernandez Gonzalez want a piece of her, too.
 
Buncha fucking Ghouls. Everyone trying to make a buck off this kids death.

This "zanny" woman needs to shut up and go away. She didnt have a reputation to begin with. Who is she aside from an uneducated, minority hood rat?
 
Back
Top