To get back on track, this wasn't my latest purchase. Hell, I didn't even purchase it. It was a Christmas present from my wife. Boys, meet my friend Wildey:
What is it?
-
Hello, this board in now turned off and no new posting.
Please REGISTER at Anabolic Steroid Forums, and become a member of our NEW community!
-
Check Out IronMag Labs® KSM-66 Max - Recovery and Anabolic Growth Complex
Gun guys!
- Thread starter Killermonkey
- Start date
What is it?
- Joined
- Jun 27, 2001
- Messages
- 11,622
- Reaction score
- 333
- Points
- 0
- Age
- 63
- Location
- An alternate reality.
.475 Wildey magnum. If you've ever seen the Charles Bronson movie Death Wish 3, it plays a starring role.
I miss that guy, those movies were corny but they bring me back. Ya know?
My wife bought me a gun while I am away and she won't tell me what it is. Three more weeks till I find out. I'm dying over here
My wife bought me a gun while I am away and she won't tell me what it is. Three more weeks till I find out. I'm dying over here
My little family of 1911's, from the top-
Kimber set up for off-hand bullseye
Springfield set up for steel plate competition
Colt 1911A1 carried by my grandpa in WWII
Colt Commander 4"
Colt Defender 3" alloy frame, My carry pistol
Nice, went for the rockra ar, first ar and didn't want to shell out colt price am broke too. Man they are sweet!
I never carry 1911' s because for me, they are too heavy and I can't jam a fresh mag as fast as a regular combat pistol.
dogsoldier
Elite Member
That just tells me you need to practice tactical reloading.
No sir, not the case at all. I can jam a mag in a glock guaranteed faster than anyone in this forum and I say that with no hesitation. Even faster than all of my coworkers at my blackwater.
1911 were combat pistols for earlier wars like Vietnam and ww2, they are no longer practical as new and innovative pistols hit the market. I will put on me jamming amag in a glock to anyone with a 1911. High stakes or low stakes, I will win every time
1911 were combat pistols for earlier wars like Vietnam and ww2, they are no longer practical as new and innovative pistols hit the market. I will put on me jamming amag in a glock to anyone with a 1911. High stakes or low stakes, I will win every time
- Joined
- Jun 27, 2001
- Messages
- 11,622
- Reaction score
- 333
- Points
- 0
- Age
- 63
- Location
- An alternate reality.
Now hold on, you're talking a Glock reload vs. a single stack 1911 reload. Yeah, my money would be on the Glock but, that's like racing a Top fuel dragster against a '77 Pinto. Definitely apples to oranges comparison.
On the other hand, I carry either a double stack Para-Ordnance or STI 1911. I'm not too shabby when it comes to reloads. Not taking you up on your bet, just comparing apples to apples.
- Joined
- Jun 27, 2001
- Messages
- 11,622
- Reaction score
- 333
- Points
- 0
- Age
- 63
- Location
- An alternate reality.
And statistics support that plan BUT, plans don't always work out like planned. Plan for the worst, hope for the best.
This is a terrible view point and just wrong.. statistcs on a couple different cities in the US showed that there is was less crime in cities where not requiring a liscense to carry a gun was the law than in cities that have had out lawed guns all together. I believe it was chicago that just had its gun laws straighten out to legalize gun ownership. And as far as stalking a dude and shooting him for being on my property... any day of the week.
sorry for the late reply but i hate that stand point that cause guns are more prevalent that more people are getting shot as if criminals are going around waiting 2 weeeks for there 1500 dollar pistol and then going to kill someone with it...
Ps i love guns ..my kimber gold combat is my baby i sleep with it!!!! really
Ps i love guns ..my kimber gold combat is my baby i sleep with it!!!! really
The fastest clip you'll probably ever see. - YouTube
That ain't a glock. Mag changes are about repetition. My father competed in IPSC shooting and he was never hindered by the 1911 design. His wasn't a tricked out race gun either. It was carry able. a beveled magwell lots of practice and you are good to go. I'd love someone to tell Will Brink that he is at a disadvantage to a Glock when he is using his 1911. LOL
This is a terrible view point and just wrong.. statistcs on a couple different cities in the US showed that there is was less crime in cities where not requiring a liscense to carry a gun was the law than in cities that have had out lawed guns all together. I believe it was chicago that just had its gun laws straighten out to legalize gun ownership. And as far as stalking a dude and shooting him for being on my property... any day of the week.
I wasn't talking in relation to political morality and ethics. I was asking a hypothetical question that if, on the assumption that all handguns could be somehow removed from the country would the American public still choose to keep their handguns at the cost of the annual population that are murdered or would you surrender them. Nevermind, I already have my answer
I'm not going to argue about the stats and laws. Its a no brainer when you take the emotion out of the argument. As long as there are a fuckload of guns everywhere you are going to experience a fuckload of shootings. The fact that they are criminals doing the shootings is beside the point.
Shitload of guns = Shitloads of shootings
No access to guns = No shootings
I wasn't talking in relation to political morality and ethics. I was asking a hypothetical question that if, on the assumption that all handguns could be somehow removed from the country would the American public still choose to keep their handguns at the cost of the annual population that are murdered or would you surrender them. Nevermind, I already have my answer
I'm not going to argue about the stats and laws. Its a no brainer when you take the emotion out of the argument. As long as there are a fuckload of guns everywhere you are going to experience a fuckload of shootings. The fact that they are criminals doing the shootings is beside the point.
Shitload of guns = Shitloads of shootings
No access to guns = No shootings
And by doing this, even if it was possible you are completely missing the point of why the founders felt it necessary to give us the 2nd amendment. a reason i still find absolutely still viable today as it was then. The purpose of having an armed populace is so that the civilian population can protect itself from it's own government.
The bill of rights is a blue print for keeping people free from a dictator. If you want to control your populace you start by limiting their access to information, control the views they are allowed to publish, disarm them, limit their ability to congregate......
the 23,000 gun deaths we experience each year, while tragic, are not worth loosing the ability to protect ourselves from a tyrannical government
If it meant that it would save lives would you give up free speech, or allow the government to quarter troops in your home whenever they felt like it?
independent
Registered
anyone here watch topshot?
- Joined
- Jun 27, 2001
- Messages
- 11,622
- Reaction score
- 333
- Points
- 0
- Age
- 63
- Location
- An alternate reality.
independent
Registered
Yep, love it. I wish that Morelli bitch had gone home last night.
yup.
Obviously but gun control doesn't necessarily equal no access to guns. Without a total ban on guns you have a similar problem that the French had in WWII. After WWI the French built a line of defenses called the Maginot Line to guard against a German offensive. The problem was that these defenses only extended so far and the Germans simply went around the Maginot Line which effectively wasted resources. In the US with so many guns available criminals have no need to legally buy weapons. Waiting periods, limited magazine capacity, gun free zones and many other gun control measures are Maginot Lines.
After the UK banned handguns in '97, gun crime went up. At one point it was nearly double.
The more important point is the 2nd amendment isn't for the assurance of your safety it is to secure our free state.
dogsoldier
Elite Member
How can someone claim a Glock reloads faster than a 1911? I have both. I do things the same way when doing a fast mag replacement. You orient the mag on the mag holster, you drop you hand to the mag, index finger running down the mag front of the mag, you pull up, rotate the mag into the up position (bullet facing forward), you stab the mag. So what would be different between a Glock and 1911? I also can reload my High Powers and, Berettas in a blink. It simply is not the gun for fast mag changes, it is the user. I shoot 3 gun and IDPA regularly and practice a lot.
- Joined
- Oct 24, 2012
- Messages
- 1,765
- Reaction score
- 226
- Points
- 0
- Location
- Still on this side of the grass.
I just acquired a quad 50 mount circa 1942. Much like this one:
It is in need of repair and refinishing before I can mount "the girls" to it and actually use it.
I've been waiting a while for the right deal. Built the M2's from parts kits and my own right side plates.
Unfortunately, they're non-transferrable under NFA so don't ask...
It is in need of repair and refinishing before I can mount "the girls" to it and actually use it.
I've been waiting a while for the right deal. Built the M2's from parts kits and my own right side plates.
Unfortunately, they're non-transferrable under NFA so don't ask...
- Joined
- Oct 24, 2012
- Messages
- 1,765
- Reaction score
- 226
- Points
- 0
- Location
- Still on this side of the grass.
Our 2nd amendment right to keep and bear arms it what protects ALL of our other rights.
HeavyLifter
Registered
I want this for Christmas, Santa better give it to me
Now this is one sexy truck! Go big or go home
- Joined
- Oct 24, 2012
- Messages
- 1,765
- Reaction score
- 226
- Points
- 0
- Location
- Still on this side of the grass.
rage racing
Registered
Just picked up a Sig Scorpion 1911 and finished up my SA M1A in a JAE-100 chassis with Vortex glass.
